These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9042496)

  • 1. Speech perception of Japanese language in patients using cochlear implants.
    Kawano M; Naito Y; Takahashi H; Shiomi Y; Ito J
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 1997; 52():240-3. PubMed ID: 9042496
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessing the benefits of cochlear implants in an oral education program.
    Geers AE; Moog JS
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 1995; 50():119-24. PubMed ID: 7610946
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Frequency discrimination and speech recognition by patients who use the Ineraid and continuous interleaved sampling cochlear-implant signal processors.
    Dorman MF; Smith LM; Smith M; Parkin JL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Feb; 99(2):1174-84. PubMed ID: 8609301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The contribution of apical stimulation to Mandarin speech perception in users of the MED-EL COMBI 40+ cochlear implant.
    Qi B; Liu B; Krenmayr A; Liu S; Gong S; Liu H; Zhang N; Han D
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2011 Jan; 131(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 20863152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Speech perception and production performance of prelingually deafened adolescents after cochlear implantation.
    Wong RK; Chung E; Hui Y; Wong B; Wei WI
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2000; 57():373-6. PubMed ID: 11892193
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [The changes in the distinctness and discrimination of phonems of cochlear implants children].
    Pruszewicz A; Szyfter W; Kawczńiski M; Karlik M; Drabent A; Sporna A
    Otolaryngol Pol; 2004; 58(5):965-70. PubMed ID: 15732783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Distinctness and discrimination of phonemes in children with cochlear implants--preliminary report].
    Pruszewicz A; Demeńko G; Szyfter W; Kawczyński M; Wiskarska-Woźnica B; Wika T; Karlik M; Drabent A; Sporna A
    Otolaryngol Pol; 2003; 57(1):109-13. PubMed ID: 12741154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Longitudinal analysis of hearing ability and electrodes status in post-lingual deaf adult with cochlear implantation.
    Shintani T; Himi T; Yamaguchi T; Kataura A
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 1997; 52():229-32. PubMed ID: 9042493
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Patterns of phoneme perception errors by listeners with cochlear implants as a function of overall speech perception ability.
    Munson B; Donaldson GS; Allen SL; Collison EA; Nelson DA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Feb; 113(2):925-35. PubMed ID: 12597186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Vowel and consonant identification tests can be used to compare performances in a multilingual group of cochlear implant patients.
    Pelizzone M; Boëx C; Montandon P
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 1993; 55(6):341-6. PubMed ID: 8265119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Speech perception performance of Mandarin-speaking cochlear implantees.
    Huang TS; Wang NM; Liu SY; Huang WH; Chen HC
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 1997; 52():244-9. PubMed ID: 9042497
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. 7-year speech perception results and the effects of age, residual hearing and preimplant speech perception in prelingually deaf children using the Nucleus and Clarion cochlear implants.
    Tyler RS; Kelsay DM; Teagle HF; Rubinstein JT; Gantz BJ; Christ AM
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2000; 57():305-10. PubMed ID: 11892175
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Perceptual abilities of children with the Nucleus 22-channel cochlear implant.
    Staller SJ; Dowell RC; Beiter AL; Brimacombe JA
    Ear Hear; 1991 Aug; 12(4 Suppl):34S-47S. PubMed ID: 1955089
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Speech perception and speech intelligibility in children with multichannel cochlear implants.
    Miyamoto RT; Kirk KI; Robbins AM; Todd S; Riley A; Pisoni DB
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 1997; 52():198-203. PubMed ID: 9042486
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Contributing factors to improved speech perception in children using the Nucleus 22-channel cochlear prosthesis.
    Cowan RS; Galvin KL; Klieve S; Barker EJ; Sarant JZ; Dettman S; Hollow R; Rance G; Dowell RC; Pyman B; Clark GM
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 1997; 52():193-7. PubMed ID: 9042485
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [The discrimination rate in the consonant by cochlear implanted].
    Zhang L; Zhang DX; Zhang XH; Zhang WJ
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2000 May; 14(5):197-8. PubMed ID: 12541540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Speech perception test in Italian language for profoundly deaf children].
    Genovese E; Orzan E; Turrini M; Babighian G; Arslan E
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 1995 Oct; 15(5):383-90. PubMed ID: 8721729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Improvement in speech perception and production abilities in children using a multichannel cochlear implant.
    Waltzman S; Cohen NL; Spivak L; Ying E; Brackett D; Shapiro W; Hoffman R
    Laryngoscope; 1990 Mar; 100(3):240-3. PubMed ID: 2308447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Perception of speech features by French-speaking children with cochlear implants.
    Bouton S; Serniclaes W; Bertoncini J; Colé P
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Feb; 55(1):139-53. PubMed ID: 22199195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of Spectral and Temporal Resolution in Cochlear Implant Users Using Psychoacoustic Discrimination and Speech Cue Categorization.
    Winn MB; Won JH; Moon IJ
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(6):e377-e390. PubMed ID: 27438871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.