These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. A decade has passed...the Pap smear and cervical cancer. Linder J Am J Clin Pathol; 1997 Nov; 108(5):492-8. PubMed ID: 9353086 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. In vitro adjuncts to the pap smear. Felix JC; Amezcua C Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 2002 Dec; 29(4):685-99, vii. PubMed ID: 12509092 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. In vitro conventional cytology historical strengths and current limitations. Spitzer M Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 2002 Dec; 29(4):673-83. PubMed ID: 12509091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of the PAPNET cytologic screening system for quality control of cervical smears. Koss LG; Lin E; Schreiber K; Elgert P; Mango L Am J Clin Pathol; 1994 Feb; 101(2):220-9. PubMed ID: 8116579 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pap smears are financially undervalued in the United States. Herbert A Hum Pathol; 1997 Oct; 28(10):1218. PubMed ID: 9343333 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Cervical cancer screening: the Pap smear. Summary of an NIH consensus statement. Br Med J; 1980 Nov; 281(6250):1264-6. PubMed ID: 7427661 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The costs, clinical benefits, and cost-effectiveness of screening for cervical cancer in HIV-infected women. Goldie SJ; Weinstein MC; Kuntz KM; Freedberg KA Ann Intern Med; 1999 Jan; 130(2):97-107. PubMed ID: 10068381 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The annual Pap smear: an idea whose time has gone? Marx JL Science; 1979 Jul; 205(4402):177-8. PubMed ID: 451586 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Should we abandon pap smear testing? DeMay RM Am J Clin Pathol; 2000 Nov; 114 Suppl():S48-51. PubMed ID: 11996169 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The adequate Papanicolaou smear revisited. Greening SE Diagn Cytopathol; 1985; 1(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 3836072 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Why more is not always better: new Pap smear guidelines. Vegunta S; Kransdorf LN; Mayer AP J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2014 Jan; 23(1):105-6. PubMed ID: 24325612 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Pap smear provision in general practice. London L; Mackenzie I S Afr Med J; 1993 Feb; 83(2):138-9. PubMed ID: 8466577 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Pap smears. Still a reliable screening tool for cervical cancer. Stack PS Postgrad Med; 1997 Apr; 101(4):207-8, 211-4. PubMed ID: 9126213 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Stanley F. Patten, Jr., M.D., Ph.D. and the development of an automated Papanicolaou smear screening system. Lee JS; Nelson AC Cancer; 1997 Dec; 81(6):332-6. PubMed ID: 9438457 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Pap smear. Mehta V; Vasanth V; Balachandran C Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol; 2009; 75(2):214-6. PubMed ID: 19293526 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]