These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9044168)

  • 1. A comparison of a Bayesian population method with two methods as implemented in commercially available software.
    Bennett JE; Wakefield JC
    J Pharmacokinet Biopharm; 1996 Aug; 24(4):403-32. PubMed ID: 9044168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Parametric and nonparametric population methods: their comparative performance in analysing a clinical dataset and two Monte Carlo simulation studies.
    Bustad A; Terziivanov D; Leary R; Port R; Schumitzky A; Jelliffe R
    Clin Pharmacokinet; 2006; 45(4):365-83. PubMed ID: 16584284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Performance comparison of first-order conditional estimation with interaction and Bayesian estimation methods for estimating the population parameters and its distribution from data sets with a low number of subjects.
    Pradhan S; Song B; Lee J; Chae JW; Kim KI; Back HM; Han N; Kwon KI; Yun HY
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):154. PubMed ID: 29191177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessing convergence of Markov chain Monte Carlo simulations in hierarchical Bayesian models for population pharmacokinetics.
    Dodds MG; Vicini P
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2004 Sep; 32(9):1300-13. PubMed ID: 15493516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of Nonmem 7.2 estimation methods and parallel processing efficiency on a target-mediated drug disposition model.
    Gibiansky L; Gibiansky E; Bauer R
    J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2012 Feb; 39(1):17-35. PubMed ID: 22101761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of bias, precision, robustness and runtime for estimation methods in NONMEM 7.
    Johansson ÅM; Ueckert S; Plan EL; Hooker AC; Karlsson MO
    J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2014 Jun; 41(3):223-38. PubMed ID: 24801864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of the nonparametric estimation method in NONMEM VI.
    Savic RM; Kjellsson MC; Karlsson MO
    Eur J Pharm Sci; 2009 Apr; 37(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 19159684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Population kinetics and conditional assessment of the optimal dosage regimen using the P-PHARM software package.
    Gomeni R; Pineau G; Mentré F
    Anticancer Res; 1994; 14(6A):2321-6. PubMed ID: 7825966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A survey of population analysis methods and software for complex pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic models with examples.
    Bauer RJ; Guzy S; Ng C
    AAPS J; 2007 Mar; 9(1):E60-83. PubMed ID: 17408237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of uncertainty parameters estimated by different population PK software and methods.
    Dartois C; Lemenuel-Diot A; Laveille C; Tranchand B; Tod M; Girard P
    J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2007 Jun; 34(3):289-311. PubMed ID: 17216368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Estimation of population pharmacokinetic parameters of saquinavir in HIV patients with the MONOLIX software.
    Lavielle M; Mentré F
    J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2007 Apr; 34(2):229-49. PubMed ID: 17211713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Efficient parameter estimation for models of healthcare-associated pathogen transmission in discrete and continuous time.
    Thomas A; Redd A; Khader K; Leecaster M; Greene T; Samore M
    Math Med Biol; 2015 Mar; 32(1):79-98. PubMed ID: 24114068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparing the performance of FOCE and different expectation-maximization methods in handling complex population physiologically-based pharmacokinetic models.
    Liu X; Wang Y
    J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2016 Aug; 43(4):359-70. PubMed ID: 27215925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Markov chain Monte Carlo estimation of a multiparameter decision model: consistency of evidence and the accurate assessment of uncertainty.
    Ades AE; Cliffe S
    Med Decis Making; 2002; 22(4):359-71. PubMed ID: 12150601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of Bayesian and maximum-likelihood inference of population genetic parameters.
    Beerli P
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Feb; 22(3):341-5. PubMed ID: 16317072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Application of the Bayesian dynamic survival model in medicine.
    He J; McGee DL; Niu X
    Stat Med; 2010 Feb; 29(3):347-60. PubMed ID: 20014356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. NONMEM version III implementation on a VAX 9000: a DCL procedure for single-step execution and the unrealized advantage of a vectorizing FORTRAN compiler.
    Vielhaber JP; Kuhlman JV; Barrett JS
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 1993 Jun; 40(2):103-15. PubMed ID: 8370277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bayesian analysis of physiologically based toxicokinetic and toxicodynamic models.
    Hack CE
    Toxicology; 2006 Apr; 221(2-3):241-8. PubMed ID: 16466842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Using Hamiltonian Monte Carlo to estimate the log-linear cognitive diagnosis model via Stan.
    Jiang Z; Carter R
    Behav Res Methods; 2019 Apr; 51(2):651-662. PubMed ID: 29949073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Data cloning: easy maximum likelihood estimation for complex ecological models using Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo methods.
    Lele SR; Dennis B; Lutscher F
    Ecol Lett; 2007 Jul; 10(7):551-63. PubMed ID: 17542934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.