These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

52 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9045228)

  • 1. [Optimization of the mammography report].
    Simonetti G
    Radiol Med; 1996 Oct; 92(4):343-5. PubMed ID: 9045228
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mammography interpretation: the BI-RADS method.
    D'Orsi CJ; Kopans DB
    Am Fam Physician; 1997 Apr; 55(5):1548-50, 1552. PubMed ID: 9105186
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Biannual or biennial mammography?].
    Seguí Díaz M
    Med Clin (Barc); 1999 Apr; 112(12):479. PubMed ID: 10320968
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Complicating the mammography message.
    Blacksher E
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1997; 27(2):48. PubMed ID: 9131352
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mammography. Part 2. Evaluation of equipment and guidelines for quality assurance.
    Zamenhof RG; Homer MJ
    Appl Radiol; 1984; 13(6):51-4. PubMed ID: 10268876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Recall and detection rates in screening mammography.
    Yankaskas BC; Schell MJ; Miglioretti DL
    Cancer; 2004 Dec; 101(11):2710-1; author reply 2711-2. PubMed ID: 15499596
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Screening mammography in women 40 to 49 years of age.
    Lisby MD
    Am Fam Physician; 2004 Nov; 70(9):1750-2. PubMed ID: 15554494
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [What kind of information do German health information pamphlets provide on mammography screening?].
    Kurzenhäuser S
    Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich; 2003 Feb; 97(1):53-7. PubMed ID: 12669690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mammography screening in women 40 to 49 years old.
    Léger MM; McNellis R;
    JAAPA; 2007 Nov; 20(11):16, 18. PubMed ID: 18035758
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mammography malpractice litigation and the impact of MQSA (Mammography Quality Standards Act).
    Whiteman T
    Adm Radiol; 1995 Mar; 14(3):29-31. PubMed ID: 10142158
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quality mammography standards--FDA. Proposed rule.
    Fed Regist; 1998 Nov; 63(214):59750-1. PubMed ID: 10187387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Patients' reports of counseling on mammography screening by health-care providers--North Carolina, 1997.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
    MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep; 1999 May; 48(17):356-8. PubMed ID: 10363960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Factors affecting increasing radiation dose for mammography in North Carolina from 1997 through 2001: an analysis of Food and Drug Administration annual surveys.
    Pisano ED; Chiu YF; Ni L; Li Y; Britt GG; Johnson RE; Burns B; Cole E; Kuzmiak C; Koomen M; Pavic D
    Acad Radiol; 2004 May; 11(5):536-43. PubMed ID: 15147618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Screening out the doubts: educating patients and clinicians about mammography.
    Seago K
    Appl Radiol; 1987 Nov; 16(11):107, 110, 112 passim. PubMed ID: 10285157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A report on how North Carolina is improving mammogram quality.
    Britt GG
    N C Med J; 1999; 60(5):259-60. PubMed ID: 10495653
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Present-day technical support of mammography].
    Rozhkova NI; Chikirdin EG; Kochetova GP; Riudiger IuG; Lisachenko IV; Iakobs OE
    Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 2000; (1):50-2. PubMed ID: 10832400
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Global quality control perspective for the physical and technical aspects of screen-film mammography--image quality and radiation dose.
    Ng KH; Jamal N; DeWerd L
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 121(4):445-51. PubMed ID: 16709704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [The verification of the parameters of x-ray mammography apparatus as used in an office].
    Chikirdin EG; Kochetova GP; Kolos AS
    Med Tekh; 1999; (5):27-30. PubMed ID: 10560093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. State certification of mammography facilities. Final rule.
    Food and Drug Administration, HHS
    Fed Regist; 2002 Feb; 67(25):5446-69. PubMed ID: 11852885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Editorial commentary: Screening mammography.
    Lawrence W
    J Surg Oncol; 2002 Dec; 81(4):159. PubMed ID: 12451616
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.