These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

52 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9045228)

  • 21. Factors affecting decreasing radiation dose for mammography in North Carolina after 2002: an analysis of Food and Drug Administration annual surveys.
    Kuzmiak CM; Pisano ED; Chung Y; Britt GG; Burns B; Cole E
    Acad Radiol; 2007 Jun; 14(6):685-91. PubMed ID: 17502258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Reliability of various tools for the quality control of mammography].
    Di Maggio C; Gennaro G; Cattozzo S
    Radiol Med; 1998 Nov; 96(5):507-12. PubMed ID: 10051877
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Medical devices; Mammography Quality Standards Act of 1992; inspection fees--FDA. Notice.
    Fed Regist; 1995 Mar; 60(52):14584-6. PubMed ID: 10141780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Controversies in mammography.
    Timins JK
    N J Med; 2005; 102(1-2):45-9. PubMed ID: 15790065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Compliance with mammography guidelines: physician recommendation and patient adherence.
    May DS; Kiefe CI; Funkhouser E; Fouad MN
    Prev Med; 1999 Apr; 28(4):386-94. PubMed ID: 10090868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Confrontation of mammography systems in flanders with the European Guidelines for Quality Assurance in mammography screening. Analysis of initial results.
    Bosmans H; Carton AK; Deprez T; Rogge F; Van Steen A; Van Limbergen E; Marchal G
    JBR-BTR; 1999 Dec; 82(6):288-93. PubMed ID: 10670170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Quality mammography standards--FDA. Final rule.
    Fed Regist; 1997 Oct; 62(208):55852-994. PubMed ID: 10177306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Quality standards and certification requirements for mammography facilities--FDA. Interim rule; opportunity for public comment.
    Fed Regist; 1994 Sep; 59(189):49808-13. PubMed ID: 10137648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. First criminal penalty imposed for mammography act violations.
    Lewis C
    FDA Consum; 1999; 33(2):36-7. PubMed ID: 10214122
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Recommendations for a QA program for digital mammography].
    Noel A; Stines J; Heid P; Lisbona A; Verdun FR; Barreau B; Caselles O; Hagay C; Isnard A; Levy L; Marelle P; Séradour B; Tardivon A; Thibaut F; Tournemaine N; Valentin F;
    J Radiol; 2003 Jun; 84(6):723-9. PubMed ID: 12910183
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. 17% of Mich. mammography units substandard.
    Wagner M
    Mod Healthc; 1992 Feb; 22(8):14. PubMed ID: 10116327
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Quality standards and certification requirements for mammography facilities--FDA. Interim rule with request for comments.
    Fed Regist; 1993 Dec; 58(243):67565-72. PubMed ID: 10131225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Mammography accreditation.
    Hare WS
    Australas Radiol; 1997 Nov; 41(4):323. PubMed ID: 9409021
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. FDA considers recommendations on mammography quality.
    Randal J
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2005 Dec; 97(23):1721-2. PubMed ID: 16333026
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Digital mammography: quality and dose control.
    Di Maggio C; Gambaccini M; Gennaro G; Baldelli P; Taibi A; Chersevani R; Aimonetto S; Rossetti V; Origgi D; Vigorito S; Contento G; Angelini L; Maggi S
    Radiol Med; 2004; 107(5-6):459-73. PubMed ID: 15195008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Requirements for accrediting bodies of mammography facilities--FDA. Interim rule with request for comments.
    Fed Regist; 1993 Dec; 58(243):67558-65. PubMed ID: 10131224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Verbal misalliance.
    Marshall RJ
    N Engl J Med; 1968 Aug; 279(6):331. PubMed ID: 5660332
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Dot size, lead time, and other such clever cognomen: the use of catch phrases.
    Rogers LF
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 May; 176(5):1103. PubMed ID: 11312160
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Optimization of the mammography report].
    Simonetti G
    Radiol Med; 1996 Oct; 92(4):343-5. PubMed ID: 9045228
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Mammography interpretation: the BI-RADS method.
    D'Orsi CJ; Kopans DB
    Am Fam Physician; 1997 Apr; 55(5):1548-50, 1552. PubMed ID: 9105186
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.