BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

83 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9045463)

  • 1. [Resectability of papillary and pancreatic cancer assessed by ultrasonography and computer tomography].
    Sørensen MB; Weibull AS; Haubek A; Rokkjaer M; Jørgensen J
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1997 Feb; 159(6):743-7. PubMed ID: 9045463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Experience with laparoscopic ultrasonography for defining tumour resectability in carcinoma of the pancreatic head and periampullary region.
    Taylor AM; Roberts SA; Manson JM
    Br J Surg; 2001 Aug; 88(8):1077-83. PubMed ID: 11488793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The role of CT and endoscopic ultrasound in pre-operative staging of pancreatic cancer.
    Kala Z; Válek V; Hlavsa J; Hana K; Vánová A
    Eur J Radiol; 2007 May; 62(2):166-9. PubMed ID: 17344007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment of resectability of carcinoma of the pancreatic head by ultrasonography and computed tomography. A retrospective analysis.
    de Roos WK; Welvaart K; Bloem JL; Hermans J
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 1990 Oct; 16(5):411-6. PubMed ID: 2209835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Computed tomography is important in assessing resectability of pancreatic carcinoma, even after ultrasonographic demonstration of the tumour.
    Hyöty MK
    Ann Chir Gynaecol; 1991; 80(3):259-62. PubMed ID: 1759793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Staging of pancreatic head adenocarcinoma with spiral CT and endoscopic ultrasonography: an indirect evaluation of the usefulness of laparoscopy.
    Maire F; Sauvanet A; Trivin F; Hammel P; O'Toole D; Palazzo L; Vilgrain V; Belghiti J; Ruszniewski P; Levy P
    Pancreatology; 2004; 4(5):436-40. PubMed ID: 15249711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The value of minimal access surgery in the staging of patients with potentially resectable peripancreatic malignancy.
    Conlon KC; Dougherty E; Klimstra DS; Coit DG; Turnbull AD; Brennan MF
    Ann Surg; 1996 Feb; 223(2):134-40. PubMed ID: 8597506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Computed tomography and laparoscopy in the assessment of the patient with pancreatic cancer.
    Andrén-Sandberg A; Lindberg CG; Lundstedt C; Ihse I
    J Am Coll Surg; 1998 Jan; 186(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 9449598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Carcinoma of the pancreas and papilla of Vater--assessment of resectability and factors influencing resectability in stage I carcinomas. A prospective multicentre trial in 472 patients.
    Bakkevold KE; Arnesjø B; Kambestad B
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 1992 Oct; 18(5):494-507. PubMed ID: 1426302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Preoperative evaluation of the curative resectability of gastric cancer by abdominal computed tomography and ultrasonography: a prospective comparison study.
    Kim JJ; Jung HC; Song IS; Choi KW; Kim CY; Han JK; Choi BI; Park JG; Lee KU; Choe KJ; Kim WH
    Korean J Intern Med; 1997 Jan; 12(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 9159030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prospective evaluation of ultrasound and colour duplex imaging for the assessment of surgical resectability of pancreatic tumours.
    Grützmann R; Bunk A; Kersting S; Pilarsky C; Dobrowolski F; Kuhlisch E; Ockert D; Saeger HD
    Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2003 Dec; 388(6):392-400. PubMed ID: 12910422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Laparoscopic ultrasound: a surgical "must" for second line intra-operative evaluation of pancreatic cancer resectability.
    Piccolboni P; Settembre A; Angelini P; Esposito F; Palladino S; Corcione F
    G Chir; 2015; 36(1):5-8. PubMed ID: 25827662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Laparoscopy and laparoscopic ultrasound in the evaluation of pancreatic and periampullary tumours.
    Doran HE; Bosonnet L; Connor S; Jones L; Garvey C; Hughes M; Campbell F; Hartley M; Ghaneh P; Neoptolemos JP; Sutton R
    Dig Surg; 2004; 21(4):305-13. PubMed ID: 15365229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of CT and angiography in assessing resectability of pancreatic carcinoma.
    Jafri SZ; Aisen AM; Glazer GM; Weiss CA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1984 Mar; 142(3):525-9. PubMed ID: 6607638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Identification of patients with resectable pancreatic cancer: at what stage are we?
    Gorelick AB; Scheiman JM; Fendrick AM
    Am J Gastroenterol; 1998 Oct; 93(10):1995-6. PubMed ID: 9772077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Diagnostic laparoscopy and laparoscopic ultrasonography: value of staging and assessment of resectability of pancreatic carcinoma].
    Röthlin M
    Swiss Surg; 1996; Suppl 4():25-8. PubMed ID: 8963831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Evaluation of pancreatic cancer by combined laparoscopy and echolaparoscopy].
    Catheline JM; Polliand C; Risk N; Barrat C; Champault G
    Chirurgie; 1998 Jun; 123(3):271-9. PubMed ID: 9752518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Comparison between spiral x-ray computed tomography and endosonography in the diagnosis and staging of adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Clinical preliminary study].
    Dufour B; Zins M; Vilgrain V; Levy P; Bernades P; Menu Y
    Gastroenterol Clin Biol; 1997; 21(2):124-30. PubMed ID: 9161478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Contrast-enhanced 18F-FDG PET/CT: 1-stop-shop imaging for assessing the resectability of pancreatic cancer.
    Strobel K; Heinrich S; Bhure U; Soyka J; Veit-Haibach P; Pestalozzi BC; Clavien PA; Hany TF
    J Nucl Med; 2008 Sep; 49(9):1408-13. PubMed ID: 18703604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Role of spiral computerized tomography in the staging of pancreatic carcinoma].
    Calculli L; Casadei R; Diacono D; Caputo M; Cavina M; Minguzzi MT; Marrano D; Gavelli G
    Radiol Med; 1998 Apr; 95(4):344-8. PubMed ID: 9676213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.