These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9046631)

  • 1. Cephalometric analysis of profile nasal esthetics. Part I. Method and normative data.
    Starck WJ; Epker BN
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1996; 11(2):91-103. PubMed ID: 9046631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cephalometric analysis of profile nasal esthetics. Part II. Patients with vertical maxillary excess.
    de Assis EA; Starck WJ; Epker BN
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1996; 11(3):205-10. PubMed ID: 9456623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cephalometric analysis of profile nasal esthetics. Part III. Postoperative changes after isolated superior repositioning.
    de Assis EA; Starck WJ; Epker BN
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1996; 11(4):279-88. PubMed ID: 9456605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Anthropometric measurement and analysis of the external nasal soft tissue in 119 young Han Chinese adults.
    He ZJ; Jian XC; Wu XS; Gao X; Zhou SH; Zhong XH
    J Craniofac Surg; 2009 Sep; 20(5):1347-51. PubMed ID: 19816253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [A comparative study of cephalometric evaluation criteria of the cutaneous profile].
    De Coster T
    Orthod Fr; 1991; 62 Pt 2():559-72. PubMed ID: 1749613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The relationship between craniofacial structures and the nose in Anatolian Turkish adults: a cephalometric evaluation.
    Gulsen A; Okay C; Aslan BI; Uner O; Yavuzer R
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Aug; 130(2):131.e15-25. PubMed ID: 16905054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Facial aesthetics and the divine proportion: a comparison of surgical and non-surgical class II treatment.
    Shell TL; Woods MG
    Aust Orthod J; 2004 Nov; 20(2):51-63. PubMed ID: 16429875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Angular photogrammetric analysis of the soft tissue facial profile of Turkish adults.
    Malkoç S; Demir A; Uysal T; Canbuldu N
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Apr; 31(2):174-9. PubMed ID: 19064675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Predicting nose projection and pronasale position in facial approximation: a test of published methods and proposal of new guidelines.
    Stephan CN; Henneberg M; Sampson W
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2003 Nov; 122(3):240-50. PubMed ID: 14533182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Nasal shapes and related differences in nostril forms: a morphometric analysis in young adults.
    Etöz BC; Etöz A; Ercan I
    J Craniofac Surg; 2008 Sep; 19(5):1402-8. PubMed ID: 18812872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Changes in facial profile of young adults with normal occlusion: a longitudinal study.
    Tibana RH; Palagi LM; Carneiro MS; Almeida MA; Miguel JA
    World J Orthod; 2008; 9(2):114-20. PubMed ID: 18575305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Analysis of the soft tissue facial profile by means of angular measurements.
    Anić-Milosević S; Lapter-Varga M; Slaj M
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Apr; 30(2):135-40. PubMed ID: 18263886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Lateral facial soft-tissue prediction model: analysis using Fourier shape descriptors and traditional cephalometric methods.
    Rose AD; Woods MG; Clement JG; Thomas CD
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2003 Jun; 121(2):172-80. PubMed ID: 12740960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Angular photogrammetric analysis of the soft tissue facial profile of Anatolian Turkish adults.
    Kale-Varlk S
    J Craniofac Surg; 2008 Nov; 19(6):1481-6. PubMed ID: 19098536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of soft and hard tissue profiles of orthognathic surgery patients treated recently and 20 years earlier.
    Papadopoulos MA; Lazaridou-Terzoudi T; Øland J; Athanasiou AE; Melsen B
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Jul; 108(1):e8-13. PubMed ID: 19540447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of extraction and nonextraction therapy with air-rotor stripping on facial esthetics in postadolescent borderline patients.
    Germeç D; Taner TU
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Apr; 133(4):539-49. PubMed ID: 18405818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Holdaway measurement norms in Turkish adults.
    Sahin Sağlam AM
    Quintessence Int; 2002; 33(10):757-62. PubMed ID: 12553619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Soft and hard tissue changes after bimaxillary surgery in Turkish female Class III patients.
    Marşan G; Cura N; Emekli U
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Jan; 37(1):8-17. PubMed ID: 18786833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Nasion true vertical: a proposed method for testing the clinical validity of cephalometric measurements applied to a new cephalometric reference line.
    Michiels LY; Tourne LP
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1990; 5(1):43-52. PubMed ID: 2373912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Semilongitudinal cephalometric study of craniofacial growth in untreated Class III malocclusion.
    Alexander AE; McNamara JA; Franchi L; Baccetti T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jun; 135(6):700.e1-14; discussion 700-1. PubMed ID: 19524825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.