These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

336 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9048300)

  • 1. Transient oscillation of cavitation bubbles near stone surface during electrohydraulic lithotripsy.
    Zhong P; Tong HL; Cocks FH; Preminger GM
    J Endourol; 1997 Feb; 11(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 9048300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Transient cavitation and acoustic emission produced by different laser lithotripters.
    Zhong P; Tong HL; Cocks FH; Pearle MS; Preminger GM
    J Endourol; 1998 Aug; 12(4):371-8. PubMed ID: 9726407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cavitation bubble cluster activity in the breakage of kidney stones by lithotripter shockwaves.
    Pishchalnikov YA; Sapozhnikov OA; Bailey MR; Williams JC; Cleveland RO; Colonius T; Crum LA; Evan AP; McAteer JA
    J Endourol; 2003 Sep; 17(7):435-46. PubMed ID: 14565872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Recent developments in SWL physics research.
    Zhong P; Xi X; Zhu S; Cocks FH; Preminger GM
    J Endourol; 1999 Nov; 13(9):611-7. PubMed ID: 10608511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Inertial cavitation and associated acoustic emission produced during electrohydraulic shock wave lithotripsy.
    Zhong P; Cioanta I; Cocks FH; Preminger GM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 May; 101(5 Pt 1):2940-50. PubMed ID: 9165740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quantitative measurements of acoustic emissions from cavitation at the surface of a stone in response to a lithotripter shock wave.
    Chitnis PV; Cleveland RO
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Apr; 119(4):1929-32. PubMed ID: 16642802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of frequency doubled double pulse Nd:YAG laser fiber proximity to the target stone on transient cavitation and acoustic emission.
    Fuh E; Haleblian GE; Norris RD; Albala WD; Simmons N; Zhong P; Preminger GM
    J Urol; 2007 Apr; 177(4):1542-5. PubMed ID: 17382775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Multiphase fluid-solid coupled analysis of shock-bubble-stone interaction in shockwave lithotripsy.
    Wang KG
    Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2017 Oct; 33(10):. PubMed ID: 27885825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Controlled, forced collapse of cavitation bubbles for improved stone fragmentation during shock wave lithotripsy.
    Zhong P; Cocks FH; Cioanta I; Preminger GM
    J Urol; 1997 Dec; 158(6):2323-8. PubMed ID: 9366384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Characteristics of the secondary bubble cluster produced by an electrohydraulic shock wave lithotripter.
    Zhou Y; Qin J; Zhong P
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2012 Apr; 38(4):601-10. PubMed ID: 22390990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Improvement of stone fragmentation during shock-wave lithotripsy using a combined EH/PEAA shock-wave generator-in vitro experiments.
    Xi X; Zhong P
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2000 Mar; 26(3):457-67. PubMed ID: 10773377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Enhanced High-Rate Shockwave Lithotripsy Stone Comminution in an In Vivo Porcine Model Using Acoustic Bubble Coalescence.
    Alavi Tamaddoni H; Roberts WW; Duryea AP; Cain CA; Hall TL
    J Endourol; 2016 Dec; 30(12):1321-1325. PubMed ID: 27762629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A dual passive cavitation detector for localized detection of lithotripsy-induced cavitation in vitro.
    Cleveland RO; Sapozhnikov OA; Bailey MR; Crum LA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Mar; 107(3):1745-58. PubMed ID: 10738826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Why stones break better at slow shockwave rates than at fast rates: in vitro study with a research electrohydraulic lithotripter.
    Pishchalnikov YA; McAteer JA; Williams JC; Pishchalnikova IV; Vonderhaar RJ
    J Endourol; 2006 Aug; 20(8):537-41. PubMed ID: 16903810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Jet formation and shock wave emission during collapse of ultrasound-induced cavitation bubbles and their role in the therapeutic applications of high-intensity focused ultrasound.
    Brujan EA; Ikeda T; Matsumoto Y
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Oct; 50(20):4797-809. PubMed ID: 16204873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Suppressing bubble shielding effect in shock wave lithotripsy by low intensity pulsed ultrasound.
    Wang JC; Zhou Y
    Ultrasonics; 2015 Jan; 55():65-74. PubMed ID: 25173067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Investigation of differences between nanosecond electropulse and electrohydraulic methods of lithotripsy: a comparative in vitro study of efficacy.
    Martov A; Gudkov A; Diamant V; Chepovetsky G; Lerner M
    J Endourol; 2014 Apr; 28(4):437-45. PubMed ID: 24313364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Focused Ultrasound and Lithotripsy.
    Ikeda T; Yoshizawa S; Koizumi N; Mitsuishi M; Matsumoto Y
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2016; 880():113-29. PubMed ID: 26486335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cavitation cluster dynamics in shock-wave lithotripsy: part 1. Free field.
    Arora M; Junge L; Ohl CD
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2005 Jun; 31(6):827-39. PubMed ID: 15936498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reduction of bubble cavitation by modifying the diffraction wave from a lithotripter aperture.
    Zhou Y
    J Endourol; 2012 Aug; 26(8):1075-84. PubMed ID: 22332839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.