These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9048355)

  • 21. Stochastic versus deterministic kernel-based superposition approaches for dose calculation of intensity-modulated arcs.
    Tang G; Earl MA; Luan S; Wang C; Cao D; Yu CX; Naqvi SA
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Sep; 53(17):4733-46. PubMed ID: 18701770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Dose calculation validation of Vmc++ for photon beams.
    Gardner J; Siebers J; Kawrakow I
    Med Phys; 2007 May; 34(5):1809-18. PubMed ID: 17555262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Integrated multicriterial optimization of beam angles and intensity profiles for coplanar and noncoplanar head and neck IMRT and implications for VMAT.
    Voet PW; Breedveld S; Dirkx ML; Levendag PC; Heijmen BJ
    Med Phys; 2012 Aug; 39(8):4858-65. PubMed ID: 22894412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Acceleration of dose calculations for intensity-modulated radiotherapy.
    Siebers JV; Tong S; Lauterbach M; Wu Q; Mohan R
    Med Phys; 2001 Jun; 28(6):903-10. PubMed ID: 11439487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. iCycle: Integrated, multicriterial beam angle, and profile optimization for generation of coplanar and noncoplanar IMRT plans.
    Breedveld S; Storchi PR; Voet PW; Heijmen BJ
    Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 39(2):951-63. PubMed ID: 22320804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Automatic beam angle selection in IMRT planning using genetic algorithm.
    Li Y; Yao J; Yao D
    Phys Med Biol; 2004 May; 49(10):1915-32. PubMed ID: 15214533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Spherical cluster analysis for beam angle optimization in intensity-modulated radiation therapy treatment planning.
    Bangert M; Oelfke U
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Oct; 55(19):6023-37. PubMed ID: 20858916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A treatment planning comparison of intensity modulated photon and proton therapy for paraspinal sarcomas.
    Weber DC; Trofimov AV; Delaney TF; Bortfeld T
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Apr; 58(5):1596-606. PubMed ID: 15050341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Refinements of the finite-size pencil beam model of three-dimensional photon dose calculation.
    Ostapiak OZ; Zhu Y; Van Dyk J
    Med Phys; 1997 May; 24(5):743-50. PubMed ID: 9167166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Dosimetric advantages of IMPT over IMRT for laser-accelerated proton beams.
    Luo W; Li J; Fourkal E; Fan J; Xu X; Chen Z; Jin L; Price R; Ma CM
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Dec; 53(24):7151-66. PubMed ID: 19033641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Beamlet based direct aperture optimization for MERT using a photon MLC.
    Henzen D; Manser P; Frei D; Volken W; Neuenschwander H; Born EJ; Joosten A; Lössl K; Aebersold DM; Chatelain C; Stampanoni MF; Fix MK
    Med Phys; 2014 Dec; 41(12):121711. PubMed ID: 25471958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Feasibility study of beam orientation class-solutions for prostate IMRT.
    Schreibmann E; Xing L
    Med Phys; 2004 Oct; 31(10):2863-70. PubMed ID: 15543796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Beam orientation optimization for intensity modulated radiation therapy using adaptive l(2,1)-minimization.
    Jia X; Men C; Lou Y; Jiang SB
    Phys Med Biol; 2011 Oct; 56(19):6205-22. PubMed ID: 21891848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. An algorithm for fast beam angle selection in intensity modulated radiotherapy.
    Vaitheeswaran R; Narayanan VK; Bhangle JR; Nirhali A; Kumar N; Basu S; Maiya V
    Med Phys; 2010 Dec; 37(12):6443-52. PubMed ID: 21302800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Volumetric modulation arc radiotherapy with flattening filter-free beams compared with static gantry IMRT and 3D conformal radiotherapy for advanced esophageal cancer: a feasibility study.
    Nicolini G; Ghosh-Laskar S; Shrivastava SK; Banerjee S; Chaudhary S; Agarwal JP; Munshi A; Clivio A; Fogliata A; Mancosu P; Vanetti E; Cozzi L
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Oct; 84(2):553-60. PubMed ID: 22386376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The comparison of radiotherapy techniques for treatment of the prostate cancer: the three-field vs. the four-field.
    Milecki P; Piotrowski T; Dymnicka M
    Neoplasma; 2004; 51(1):64-9. PubMed ID: 15004663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of simulated annealing algorithms for conformal therapy treatment planning.
    Rosen II; Lam KS; Lane RG; Langer M; Morrill SM
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1995 Dec; 33(5):1091-9. PubMed ID: 7493835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Computer-assisted selection of coplanar beam orientations in intensity-modulated radiation therapy.
    Pugachev A; Xing L
    Phys Med Biol; 2001 Sep; 46(9):2467-76. PubMed ID: 11580182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Monte Carlo evaluation of 6 MV intensity modulated radiotherapy plans for head and neck and lung treatments.
    Wang L; Yorke E; Chui CS
    Med Phys; 2002 Nov; 29(11):2705-17. PubMed ID: 12462739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A comparison of conventional 'forward planning' with inverse planning for 3D conformal radiotherapy of the prostate.
    Oldham M; Neal A; Webb S
    Radiother Oncol; 1995 Jun; 35(3):248-62. PubMed ID: 7480829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.