These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9048355)

  • 41. Benefit of using biologic parameters (EUD and NTCP) in IMRT optimization for treatment of intrahepatic tumors.
    Thomas E; Chapet O; Kessler ML; Lawrence TS; Ten Haken RK
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Jun; 62(2):571-8. PubMed ID: 15890602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Speed and convergence properties of gradient algorithms for optimization of IMRT.
    Zhang X; Liu H; Wang X; Dong L; Wu Q; Mohan R
    Med Phys; 2004 May; 31(5):1141-52. PubMed ID: 15191303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Clinical implementation of intensity-modulated tangential beam irradiation for breast cancer.
    Li JS; Freedman GM; Price R; Wang L; Anderson P; Chen L; Xiong W; Yang J; Pollack A; Ma CM
    Med Phys; 2004 May; 31(5):1023-31. PubMed ID: 15191288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Effect of beam number on organ-at-risk sparing in dynamic multileaf collimator delivery of intensity modulated radiation therapy.
    Popple RA; Fiveash JB; Brezovich IA
    Med Phys; 2007 Oct; 34(10):3752-9. PubMed ID: 17985620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Improvements in prostate radiotherapy from the customization of beam directions.
    Rowbottom CG; Webb S; Oldham M
    Med Phys; 1998 Jul; 25(7 Pt 1):1171-9. PubMed ID: 9682202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Beam angle optimization and reduction for intensity-modulated radiation therapy of non-small-cell lung cancers.
    Liu HH; Jauregui M; Zhang X; Wang X; Dong L; Mohan R
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Jun; 65(2):561-72. PubMed ID: 16690438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Optimization of the dose delivery in a few field techniques using radiobiological objective functions.
    Södertröm S; Brahme A
    Med Phys; 1993; 20(4):1201-10. PubMed ID: 8413030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Volumetric modulated arc therapy: planning and evaluation for prostate cancer cases.
    Zhang P; Happersett L; Hunt M; Jackson A; Zelefsky M; Mageras G
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2010 Apr; 76(5):1456-62. PubMed ID: 19540062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Beam geometry selection using sequential beam addition.
    Popple RA; Brezovich IA; Fiveash JB
    Med Phys; 2014 May; 41(5):051713. PubMed ID: 24784379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The clinical value of non-coplanar photon beams in biologically optimized intensity modulated dose delivery on deep-seated tumours.
    Ferreira BC; Svensson R; Löf J; Brahme A
    Acta Oncol; 2003; 42(8):852-64. PubMed ID: 14968947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Accelerated iterative beam angle selection in IMRT.
    Bangert M; Unkelbach J
    Med Phys; 2016 Mar; 43(3):1073-82. PubMed ID: 26936695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Quantitative assessment of the accuracy of dose calculation using pencil beam and Monte Carlo algorithms and requirements for clinical quality assurance.
    Ali I; Ahmad S
    Med Dosim; 2013; 38(3):255-61. PubMed ID: 23558145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Accuracy of patient dose calculation for lung IMRT: A comparison of Monte Carlo, convolution/superposition, and pencil beam computations.
    Vanderstraeten B; Reynaert N; Paelinck L; Madani I; De Wagter C; De Gersem W; De Neve W; Thierens H
    Med Phys; 2006 Sep; 33(9):3149-58. PubMed ID: 17022207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. A fourier analysis on the maximum acceptable grid size for discrete proton beam dose calculation.
    Li HS; Romeijn HE; Dempsey JF
    Med Phys; 2006 Sep; 33(9):3508-18. PubMed ID: 17022247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. MCTP system model based on linear programming optimization of apertures obtained from sequencing patient image data maps.
    Ureba A; Salguero FJ; Barbeiro AR; Jimenez-Ortega E; Baeza JA; Miras H; Linares R; Perucha M; Leal A
    Med Phys; 2014 Aug; 41(8):081719. PubMed ID: 25086529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Characterizing the combinatorial beam angle selection problem.
    Bangert M; Ziegenhein P; Oelfke U
    Phys Med Biol; 2012 Oct; 57(20):6707-23. PubMed ID: 23023092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Integral dose investigation of non-coplanar treatment beam geometries in radiotherapy.
    Nguyen D; Dong P; Long T; Ruan D; Low DA; Romeijn E; Sheng K
    Med Phys; 2014 Jan; 41(1):011905. PubMed ID: 24387513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Intensity modulated radiotherapy of non-small-cell lung cancer incorporating SPECT ventilation imaging.
    Munawar I; Yaremko BP; Craig J; Oliver M; Gaede S; Rodrigues G; Yu E; Reid RH; Leung E; Urbain JL; Chen J; Wong E
    Med Phys; 2010 Apr; 37(4):1863-72. PubMed ID: 20443508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Intensity and energy modulated radiotherapy with proton beams: variables affecting optimal prostate plan.
    Yeboah C; Sandison GA; Chvetsov AV
    Med Phys; 2002 Feb; 29(2):176-89. PubMed ID: 11865989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Automated beam angle and weight selection in radiotherapy treatment planning applied to pancreas tumors.
    Woudstra E; Heijmen BJ
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2003 Jul; 56(3):878-88. PubMed ID: 12788198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.