These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9048371)

  • 1. Evaluation of three contrast correction methods for digital subtraction in dental radiography: an in vitro study.
    Likar B; Pernus F
    Med Phys; 1997 Feb; 24(2):299-307. PubMed ID: 9048371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Contrast matching techniques for digital subtraction radiography: an objective evaluation.
    Likar B; Bernard R; Pernus F
    Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp; 1996; ():294-8. PubMed ID: 8947675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Digital image processing. I. Evaluation of gray level correction methods in vitro.
    Fourmousis I; Brägger U; Bürgin W; Tonetti M; Lang NP
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 1994 Mar; 5(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 8038343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Computer correction of projective distortions in dental radiographs.
    Webber RL; Ruttimann UE; Groenhuis RA
    J Dent Res; 1984 Aug; 63(8):1032-6. PubMed ID: 6379007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of contrast enhancement and pseudocolor transformation on the diagnosis with digital subtraction images (DSI).
    Brägger U; Bürgin W; Marconi M; Häsler RU; Lang NP
    J Periodontal Res; 1994 Mar; 29(2):95-102. PubMed ID: 8158504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Histogram-matching and histogram-flattening contrast correction methods: a comparison.
    Hildebolt CF; Walkup RK; Conover GL; Yokoyama-Crothers N; Bartlett TQ; Vannier MW; Shrout MK; Camp JJ
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1996 Jan; 25(1):42-7. PubMed ID: 9084285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Computer-assisted subtraction radiography in periodontal diagnosis.
    Gröndahl K
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1987; 50():1-44. PubMed ID: 3321498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quantitative digital subtraction radiography for the assessment of peri-implant bone change.
    Jeffcoat MK; Reddy MS; van den Berg HR; Bertens E
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 1992 Mar; 3(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 1420723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A robust generalized fuzzy operator approach to film contrast correction in digital subtraction radiography.
    Leung CC
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2006 Mar; 44(1-2):95-104. PubMed ID: 16929926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Contralateral subtraction: a novel technique for detection of asymmetric abnormalities on digital chest radiographs.
    Li Q; Katsuragawa S; Ishida T; Yoshida H; Tsukuda S; MacMahon H; Doi K
    Med Phys; 2000 Jan; 27(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 10659737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of independent film and object rotation on projective geometric standardization of dental radiographs.
    Fisher E; van der Stelt PF; Ostuni J; Dunn SM
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 Feb; 24(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 8593908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Research methods in dentistry. 8. Methods for longitudinally detecting differences in bone density: digital subtraction radiography].
    van der Stelt PF
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2005 Feb; 112(2):46-50. PubMed ID: 15747997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison between subtraction radiography and conventional radiographic interpretation during long-term evaluation of periodontal therapy in Class II furcation defects.
    Cury PR; Araujo NS; Bowie J; Sallum EA; Jeffcoat MK
    J Periodontol; 2004 Aug; 75(8):1145-9. PubMed ID: 15455744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of logarithmic contrast enhancement on subtraction images.
    Versteeg KH; van der Stelt PF
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1995 Oct; 80(4):479-86. PubMed ID: 8521113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Computer-based registration for digital subtraction in dental radiology.
    Lehmann TM; Gröndahl HG; Benn DK
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Nov; 29(6):323-46. PubMed ID: 11114663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Calibration errors in digital subtraction radiography.
    Webber RL; Ruttimann UE; Heaven TJ
    J Periodontal Res; 1990 Sep; 25(5):268-75. PubMed ID: 2145412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A new method for the automated alignment of dental radiographs for digital subtraction radiography.
    Yoon DC
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Jan; 29(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 10654031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Digital subtraction radiography for longitudinal assessment of peri-implant bone change: method and validation.
    Jeffcoat MK; Reddy MS
    Adv Dent Res; 1993 Aug; 7(2):196-201. PubMed ID: 8260008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A technique of scatter-glare correction using a digital filtration.
    Honda M; Ema T; Kikuchi K; Ohe M; Komatsu K
    Med Phys; 1993; 20(1):59-69. PubMed ID: 8455514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Digital image motion correction by spatial warp methods.
    Pickens DR; Price RR; Erickson JJ; James AE
    Med Phys; 1987; 14(1):56-61. PubMed ID: 3561337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.