88 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9048372)
1. Comment on "TLD measurements of in vivo mammographic exposures and the calculated mean glandular dose across the United States" [Med. Phys. 23, 899-903 (1996)].
Nawfel RD
Med Phys; 1997 Feb; 24(2):309, 311. PubMed ID: 9048372
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. TLD measurements of in vivo mammographic exposures and the calculated mean glandular dose across the United States.
Gentry JR; DeWerd LA
Med Phys; 1996 Jun; 23(6):899-903. PubMed ID: 8798175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Individual doses for women undergoing screening mammography examinations in Poland in 2007.
Fabiszewska E; Jankowska K; Grabska I; Skrzyński W
J Radiol Prot; 2011 Dec; 31(4):467-75. PubMed ID: 22088977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Measurement of the radiation dose and assessment of the risk in mammography screening for early detection of cancer of the breast, in Israel.
Broisman A; Schlesinger T; Alfassi ZB
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Jan; 143(1):113-6. PubMed ID: 21068021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cone-beam CT for breast imaging: Radiation dose, breast coverage, and image quality.
O'Connell A; Conover DL; Zhang Y; Seifert P; Logan-Young W; Lin CF; Sahler L; Ning R
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Aug; 195(2):496-509. PubMed ID: 20651210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Technique factors and their relationship to radiation dose in pendant geometry breast CT.
Boone JM; Kwan AL; Seibert JA; Shah N; Lindfors KK; Nelson TR
Med Phys; 2005 Dec; 32(12):3767-76. PubMed ID: 16475776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Radiation dose reduction for augmentation mammography.
Smathers RL; Boone JM; Lee LJ; Berns EA; Miller RA; Wright AM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 May; 188(5):1414-21. PubMed ID: 17449790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Average glandular dose with amorphous silicon full-field digital mammography - Clinical results.
Hermann KP; Obenauer S; Marten K; Kehbel S; Fischer U; Grabbe E
Rofo; 2002 Jun; 174(6):696-9. PubMed ID: 12063597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Breast dose in mammography is about 30% lower when realistic heterogeneous glandular distributions are considered.
Hernandez AM; Seibert JA; Boone JM
Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6337-48. PubMed ID: 26520725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mammography dosimetry using an in-house developed polymethyl methacrylate phantom.
Sharma R; Sharma SD; Mayya YS; Chourasiya G
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Aug; 151(2):379-85. PubMed ID: 22232773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Average glandular dose in digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis.
Olgar T; Kahn T; Gosch D
Rofo; 2012 Oct; 184(10):911-8. PubMed ID: 22711250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of mean glandular dose in mammography.
Faulkner K; Law J; Robson KJ
Br J Radiol; 1995 Aug; 68(812):877-81. PubMed ID: 7551786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mismatch in breast and detector size during screening and diagnostic mammography results in increased patient radiation dose.
Wells CL; Slanetz PJ; Rosen MP
Acad Radiol; 2014 Jan; 21(1):99-103. PubMed ID: 24331271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Thermoluminescent dosimetry for radiation exposure of the breast during film and xeromammography (author's transl)].
Säbel M; Ruff A; Weishaar J
Rofo; 1978 May; 128(5):616-22. PubMed ID: 149076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mammography equipment performance, image quality and mean glandular dose in Malta.
Borg M; Badr I; Royle GJ
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Sep; 156(2):168-83. PubMed ID: 23525916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Normalized average glandular dose in magnification mammography.
Liu B; Goodsitt M; Chan HP
Radiology; 1995 Oct; 197(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 7568836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of the population dose to the UK population from the National Health Service Breast Screening Programme.
Faulkner K; Wallis MG; Neilson F; Whitaker CJ
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):184-90. PubMed ID: 18483008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Towards in vivo TLD dosimetry in mammography.
Warren-Forward HM; Duggan L
Br J Radiol; 2004 May; 77(917):426-32. PubMed ID: 15121707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of fixed and variable kVp technique protocols for film-screen mammography.
McParland BJ; Boyd MM
Br J Radiol; 2000 Jun; 73(870):613-26. PubMed ID: 10911785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography: Glandular dose estimation using a Monte Carlo code and voxel phantom.
Tzamicha E; Yakoumakis E; Tsalafoutas IA; Dimitriadis A; Georgiou E; Tsapaki V; Chalazonitis A
Phys Med; 2015 Nov; 31(7):785-91. PubMed ID: 25900891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
