These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

82 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9048373)

  • 1. Comment on "Quantitative classification of breast tumors in digitized mammograms" [Med. Phys. 23, 1337-1345 (1996)].
    Nishikawa RM
    Med Phys; 1997 Feb; 24(2):313, 315. PubMed ID: 9048373
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Automated detection and classification of breast tumors.
    Ng SL; Bischof WF
    Comput Biomed Res; 1992 Jun; 25(3):218-37. PubMed ID: 1611889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fully automated gradient based breast boundary detection for digitized X-ray mammograms.
    Kus P; Karagoz I
    Comput Biol Med; 2012 Jan; 42(1):75-82. PubMed ID: 22118773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quantitative classification of breast tumors in digitized mammograms.
    Pohlman S; Powell KA; Obuchowski NA; Chilcote WA; Grundfest-Broniatowski S
    Med Phys; 1996 Aug; 23(8):1337-45. PubMed ID: 8873030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Full-field digital mammographic interpretation with prior analog versus prior digitized analog mammography: time for interpretation.
    Garg AS; Rapelyea JA; Rechtman LR; Torrente J; Bittner RB; Coffey CM; Brem RF
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Jun; 196(6):1436-8. PubMed ID: 21606310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Computer aided diagnosis of calcifications in mammograms].
    Li G; Liu H; Cheng J
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Feb; 28(1):170-4. PubMed ID: 21485207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Computer-aided classification of BI-RADS category 3 breast lesions.
    Buchbinder SS; Leichter IS; Lederman RB; Novak B; Bamberger PN; Sklair-Levy M; Yarmish G; Fields SI
    Radiology; 2004 Mar; 230(3):820-3. PubMed ID: 14739315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quantitative assessment of breast density from digitized mammograms into Tabar's patterns.
    Jamal N; Ng KH; Looi LM; McLean D; Zulfiqar A; Tan SP; Liew WF; Shantini A; Ranganathan S
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Nov; 51(22):5843-57. PubMed ID: 17068368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of breast masses using digitized images versus screen-film mammography.
    Liang Z; Du X; Liu J; Yao X; Yang Y; Li K
    Acta Radiol; 2008 Jul; 49(6):618-22. PubMed ID: 18568552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Computer-aided diagnosis scheme for histological classification of clustered microcalcifications on magnification mammograms.
    Nakayama R; Uchiyama Y; Watanabe R; Katsuragawa S; Namba K; Doi K
    Med Phys; 2004 Apr; 31(4):789-99. PubMed ID: 15124996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A method to test the reproducibility and to improve performance of computer-aided detection schemes for digitized mammograms.
    Zheng B; Gur D; Good WF; Hardesty LA
    Med Phys; 2004 Nov; 31(11):2964-72. PubMed ID: 15587648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Challenges in mammography: part 1, artifacts in digital mammography.
    Geiser WR; Haygood TM; Santiago L; Stephens T; Thames D; Whitman GJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Dec; 197(6):W1023-30. PubMed ID: 22109316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of prior mammograms on combined reading of digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Kim WH; Chang JM; Koo HR; Seo M; Bae MS; Lee J; Moon WK
    Acta Radiol; 2017 Feb; 58(2):148-155. PubMed ID: 27178032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Breast cancer diagnosis in digital mammogram using multiscale curvelet transform.
    Eltoukhy MM; Faye I; Samir BB
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2010 Jun; 34(4):269-76. PubMed ID: 20004076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Computerized analysis of multiple-mammographic views: potential usefulness of special view mammograms in computer-aided diagnosis.
    Huo Z; Giger ML; Vyborny CJ
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Dec; 20(12):1285-92. PubMed ID: 11811828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Computer-assisted diagnosis in mammography].
    Sánchez Gómez SM
    Radiologia; 2010 Jun; 52 Suppl 1():14-7. PubMed ID: 20363007
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Automated detection of breast masses on mammograms using adaptive contrast enhancement and texture classification.
    Petrick N; Chan HP; Wei D; Sahiner B; Helvie MA; Adler DD
    Med Phys; 1996 Oct; 23(10):1685-96. PubMed ID: 8946366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mammographic density measured with quantitative computer-aided method: comparison with radiologists' estimates and BI-RADS categories.
    Martin KE; Helvie MA; Zhou C; Roubidoux MA; Bailey JE; Paramagul C; Blane CE; Klein KA; Sonnad SS; Chan HP
    Radiology; 2006 Sep; 240(3):656-65. PubMed ID: 16857974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Breast peripheral area correction in digital mammograms.
    Tortajada M; Oliver A; Martí R; Ganau S; Tortajada L; Sentís M; Freixenet J; Zwiggelaar R
    Comput Biol Med; 2014 Jul; 50():32-40. PubMed ID: 24845018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Computer aided system for segmentation and visualization of microcalcifications in digital mammograms.
    Reljin B; Milosević Z; Stojić T; Reljin I
    Folia Histochem Cytobiol; 2009 Jan; 47(3):525-32. PubMed ID: 20164042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.