These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9048464)

  • 1. An experimental analysis of the stresses on the implant in an implant-tooth-supported prosthesis: a technical note.
    Uysal H; Iplikçioğlu H; Avci M; Gündüz Bilir O; Kural O
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(1):118-24. PubMed ID: 9048464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Efficacy of the intramobile connector in implant tooth-supported fixed prostheses: an experimental stress analysis.
    Uysal H; Iplikcioğlu H; Avci M; Bilir OG; Kural O
    Int J Prosthodont; 1996; 9(4):355-61. PubMed ID: 8957873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Biomechanical interactions in tooth-implant-supported fixed partial dentures with variations in the number of splinted teeth and connector type: a finite element analysis.
    Lin CL; Wang JC; Chang WJ
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Jan; 19(1):107-17. PubMed ID: 17944965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Nonlinear finite element analysis of a splinted implant with various connectors and occlusal forces.
    Lin CL; Wang JC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(3):331-40. PubMed ID: 12814307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [The effect of bedding type on implant and abutment tooth in tooth/implant-supported bridgework].
    Krämer A; Weber H
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1991 Oct; 46(10):686-8. PubMed ID: 1817863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative stress analyses of fixed free-end osseointegrated prostheses using the finite element method.
    Melo C; Matsushita Y; Koyano K; Hirowatari H; Suetsugu T
    J Oral Implantol; 1995; 21(4):290-4. PubMed ID: 8699521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An investigation of tooth/implant-supported fixed prosthesis designs with two different stress analysis methods: an in vitro study.
    Ozçelik T; Ersoy AE
    J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(2):107-16. PubMed ID: 17362420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effects of superstructure fit and loading on individual implant units: Part 2. The effects of loading a superstructure with varying degrees of fit.
    Isa ZM; Hobkirk JA
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1996 Mar; 4(1):11-4. PubMed ID: 9171008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mechanical interactions of an implant/tooth-supported system under different periodontal supports and number of splinted teeth with rigid and non-rigid connections.
    Lin CL; Chang SH; Wang JC; Chang WJ
    J Dent; 2006 Oct; 34(9):682-91. PubMed ID: 16439048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fracture force of tooth-tooth- and implant-tooth-supported all-ceramic fixed partial dentures using titanium vs. customised zirconia implant abutments.
    Kolbeck C; Behr M; Rosentritt M; Handel G
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Oct; 19(10):1049-53. PubMed ID: 18707604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mechanical aspects of a Brånemark implant connected to a natural tooth: an in vitro study.
    Rangert B; Gunne J; Sullivan DY
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1991; 6(2):177-86. PubMed ID: 1809673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cyclic loading of implant-supported prostheses: changes in component fit over time.
    Hecker DM; Eckert SE
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Apr; 89(4):346-51. PubMed ID: 12690346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dental implants as strategic supplementary abutments for implant-tooth-supported telescopic crown-retained maxillary dentures: a retrospective follow-up study for up to 9 years.
    Krennmair G; Krainhöfner M; Waldenberger O; Piehslinger E
    Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(6):617-22. PubMed ID: 18069371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Retrospective evaluation of complete-arch fixed partial dentures connecting teeth and implant abutments in patients with normal and reduced periodontal support.
    Cordaro L; Ercoli C; Rossini C; Torsello F; Feng C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Oct; 94(4):313-20. PubMed ID: 16198167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of implant/prosthesis loading with four clinical variables.
    Weinberg LA; Kruger B
    Int J Prosthodont; 1995; 8(5):421-33. PubMed ID: 8595100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of the connector and implant design on the implant-tooth-connected prostheses.
    Da Silva EF; Pellizzer EP; Quinelli Mazaro JV; Garcia Júnior IR
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2010 Sep; 12(3):254-62. PubMed ID: 19438943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Survival and complication rates of combined tooth-implant-supported fixed partial dentures.
    Nickenig HJ; Schäfer C; Spiekermann H
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Oct; 17(5):506-11. PubMed ID: 16958689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Load transmission in implant superstructures supported by natural teeth and osseointegrated dental implants. A preliminary report.
    Hobkirk JA; Tanner SR
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1995 Mar; 3(3):101-5. PubMed ID: 8603151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of stress induced by implant type, number of splinted teeth, and variations in periodontal support in tooth-implant-supported fixed partial dentures: a non-linear finite element analysis.
    Lin CL; Wang JC; Chang SH; Chen ST
    J Periodontol; 2010 Jan; 81(1):121-30. PubMed ID: 20059424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The dynamic natures of implant loading.
    Wang RF; Kang B; Lang LA; Razzoog ME
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jun; 101(6):359-71. PubMed ID: 19463663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.