BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9049916)

  • 1. Marginal seal of composite inlays using different polymerization techniques.
    Liberman R; Ben-Amar A; Herteanu L; Judes H
    J Oral Rehabil; 1997 Jan; 24(1):26-9. PubMed ID: 9049916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Marginal adaptation of Class V restorations using different restorative techniques.
    Krejci I; Lutz F
    J Dent; 1991 Feb; 19(1):24-32. PubMed ID: 1901872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Microleakage of indirect inlays placed on different kinds of glass ionomer cement linings.
    Karaağaclioğlu L; Zaimoğlu A; Akören AC
    J Oral Rehabil; 1992 Sep; 19(5):457-69. PubMed ID: 1453258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of cyclic loading on marginal adaptation and bond strength in direct vs. indirect class II MO composite restorations.
    Aggarwal V; Logani A; Jain V; Shah N
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(5):587-92. PubMed ID: 18833866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Marginal microleakage of resin-modified glass-ionomer and composite resin restorations: effect of using etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives.
    Khoroushi M; Karvandi TM; Kamali B; Mazaheri H
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(3):378-83. PubMed ID: 23059577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of gingival fluid on marginal adaptation of Class II resin-based composite restorations.
    Spahr A; Schön F; Haller B
    Am J Dent; 2000 Oct; 13(5):261-6. PubMed ID: 11764113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of marginal sealing ability of new generation bonding systems.
    Yap AU; Ho KS; Wong KM
    J Oral Rehabil; 1998 Sep; 25(9):666-71. PubMed ID: 9758395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reduction of microleakage in class II composite resin restorations using retentive pins.
    Liberman R; Gorfil C; Ben-Amar A
    J Oral Rehabil; 1996 Apr; 23(4):240-3. PubMed ID: 8730270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. In vitro microleakage study of a condensable and flowable composite resin.
    Tung FF; Hsieh WW; Estafan D
    Gen Dent; 2000; 48(6):711-5. PubMed ID: 12004668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Microleakage of flowable composite resins when utilized as liners in Class II posterior composite resin restorations.
    Turner EW; Shook LW; Owens BM
    J Tenn Dent Assoc; 2002; 82(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 11979718
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Microleakage of posterior composite restorations lined with self-adhesive resin cements.
    Al-Saleh M; El-Mowafy O; Tam L; Fenton A
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(5):556-63. PubMed ID: 20945747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A light curing method for improving marginal sealing and cavity wall adaptation of resin composite restorations.
    Yoshikawa T; Burrow MF; Tagami J
    Dent Mater; 2001 Jul; 17(4):359-66. PubMed ID: 11356214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with and without liner using two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems.
    Kasraei S; Azarsina M; Majidi S
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 21702678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Microleakage in ceramic inlays luted with different resin cements.
    Mota CS; Demarco FF; Camacho GB; Powers JM
    J Adhes Dent; 2003; 5(1):63-70. PubMed ID: 12729085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Microleakage after thermocycling of 4 etch and rinse and 3 self-etch adhesives with and without a flowable composite lining.
    Guéders AM; Charpentier JF; Albert AI; Geerts SO
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(4):450-5. PubMed ID: 16924985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of finishing time and techniques on marginal sealing ability of two composite restorative materials.
    Lopes GC; Franke M; Maia HP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jul; 88(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 12239477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of additional enamel etching and a flowable composite to the interfacial integrity of Class II adhesive composite restorations.
    Belli S; Inokoshi S; Ozer F; Pereira PN; Ogata M; Tagami J
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(1):70-5. PubMed ID: 11203780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Microleakage of light-cured resin and resin-modified glass-ionomer dentin bonding agents applied with co-cure vs pre-cure technique.
    Tulunoglu O; Uçtaşh M; Alaçam A; Omürlü H
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):292-8. PubMed ID: 11203833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of a "resin coating" on the interfacial adaptation of composite inlays.
    Jayasooriya PR; Pereira PN; Nikaido T; Burrow MF; Tagami J
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 12540115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of the internal conditioning of indirect restorations of resin composite in relation to microleakage using LEDs and QTH units.
    Calabrez-Filho S; Calabrez VC; Reston EG; de Andrade MF; Borges LH
    Oper Dent; 2009; 34(3):293-8. PubMed ID: 19544818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.