These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9050635)
21. Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy compared with abdominal, vaginal, and laparoscopic vaginal hysterectomy in a primary care hospital setting. Washington JL JSLS; 2005; 9(3):292-7. PubMed ID: 16121874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy in endometrial cancer. Frigerio L; Gallo A; Ghezzi F; Trezzi G; Lussana M; Franchi M Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2006 Jun; 93(3):209-13. PubMed ID: 16631176 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Inpatient Laparoscopic Hysterectomy in the United States: Trends and Factors Associated With Approach Selection. Desai VB; Guo XM; Fan L; Wright JD; Xu X J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017 Jan; 24(1):151-158.e1. PubMed ID: 27614151 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Randomized comparison of total laparoscopic, laparoscopically assisted vaginal and vaginal hysterectomies for myomatous uteri. Sesti F; Cosi V; Calonzi F; Ruggeri V; Pietropolli A; Di Francesco L; Piccione E Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2014 Sep; 290(3):485-91. PubMed ID: 24710800 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A Randomized Comparison of Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Hysterectomies: Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy Versus Laparoscopically Assisted Vaginal Hysterectomy. Song T; Kim MK; Kim ML; Jung YW; Yun BS; Seong SJ J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2015 Jul; 25(7):541-7. PubMed ID: 26075931 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy with and without laparoscopic transsection of the uterine artery: an analysis of 1,255 cases. Kavallaris A; Kalogiannidis I; Chalvatzas N; Hornemann A; Beyer D; Georgiev I; Herrmann J; Camara O; Altgassen C; Diedrich K Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2011 Aug; 284(2):379-84. PubMed ID: 20830481 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Postoperative outcomes and quality of life following hysterectomy by natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) compared to laparoscopy in women with a non-prolapsed uterus and benign gynaecological disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Baekelandt J; De Mulder PA; Le Roy I; Mathieu C; Laenen A; Enzlin P; Weyers S; Mol BW; Bosteels JJ Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2017 Jan; 208():6-15. PubMed ID: 27880893 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A randomised comparison and economic evaluation of laparoscopic-assisted hysterectomy and abdominal hysterectomy. Lumsden MA; Twaddle S; Hawthorn R; Traynor I; Gilmore D; Davis J; Deeny M; Cameron IT; Walker JJ BJOG; 2000 Nov; 107(11):1386-91. PubMed ID: 11117767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Subtotal versus total laparoscopic hysterectomy: could women sexual function recovery overcome the surgical outcomes in pre-operatory decision making? Saccardi C; Gizzo S; Noventa M; Quaranta M; Borgato S; Conte L; Pluchino N; Litta P Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2015 Jun; 291(6):1321-6. PubMed ID: 25501834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy in endometrial cancer: surgical and survival outcomes. Fader AN; Michener CM; Frasure HE; Giannios N; Belinson JL; Zanotti KM J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2009; 16(3):333-9. PubMed ID: 19423064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Patient-reported quality-of-life and sexual-function outcomes after laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy (LSH) versus total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH): a prospective, questionnaire-based follow-up study in 915 patients. Brucker SY; Taran FA; Bogdanyova S; Ebersoll S; Wallwiener CW; Schönfisch B; Krämer B; Abele H; Neis F; Sohn C; Gawlik S; Wallwiener D; Wallwiener M Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2014 Dec; 290(6):1141-9. PubMed ID: 24973868 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. No difference in length of hospital stay between laparoscopic and abdominal supravaginal hysterectomy--a preliminary study. Oscarsson U; Poromaa IS; Nüssler E; Löfgren M Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2006; 85(6):682-7. PubMed ID: 16752259 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. Johnson N; Barlow D; Lethaby A; Tavender E; Curr E; Garry R Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2005 Jan; (1):CD003677. PubMed ID: 15674911 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Operative outcomes of single-port-access laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy compared with single-port-access total laparoscopic hysterectomy. Yoon BS; Seong SJ; Kim IH; Song T; Kim ML; Kim MK Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Dec; 53(4):486-9. PubMed ID: 25510688 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Introduction of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy in a private teaching community hospital. Bernstein P; Fenton P; Walla K; Platt LD J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc; 1994 Aug; 1(4 Pt 1):351-6. PubMed ID: 9138876 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Laparoscopic subtotal hysterectomy: evidence and techniques. Nesbitt-Hawes EM; Maley PE; Won HR; Law KS; Zhang CS; Lyons SD; Ledger W; Abbott JA J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2013; 20(4):424-34. PubMed ID: 23510954 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Does conventional or single port laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy affect female sexual function? Lee JH; Choi JS; Hong JH; Joo KJ; Kim BY Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2011 Dec; 90(12):1410-5. PubMed ID: 21854365 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Gasless single-port laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy for large uteri weighing 500g or more. Takeda A; Hayashi S; Imoto S; Nakamura H Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Aug; 203():239-44. PubMed ID: 27352286 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]