These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9050686)

  • 1. The classic intrafascial Semm hysterectomy as an alternative to abdominal hysterectomy.
    Levine DJ; Botney K
    J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc; 1996 Aug; 3(4):545-8. PubMed ID: 9050686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical analysis of pelviscopic classic intrafascial Semm hysterectomy.
    Kim Dh; Lee J; Bae Dh
    J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc; 1995 May; 2(3):289-97. PubMed ID: 9050573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Vaginal supracervical vs. laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy, with resection of transcervical and transuterine mucosa].
    Mettler L; Semm K
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1995; 117(12):633-40. PubMed ID: 8585358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A safer, simpler, classic intrafascial supracervical hysterectomy technique.
    Kim DH; Lee ES; Park SD
    JSLS; 2005; 9(2):159-62. PubMed ID: 15984702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The impact of surgeon volume on perioperative adverse events in women undergoing minimally invasive hysterectomy for the large uterus.
    Bretschneider CE; Frazzini Padilla P; Das D; Jelovsek JE; Unger CA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Nov; 219(5):490.e1-490.e8. PubMed ID: 30222939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A randomized comparison of total or supracervical hysterectomy: surgical complications and clinical outcomes.
    Learman LA; Summitt RL; Varner RE; McNeeley SG; Goodman-Gruen D; Richter HE; Lin F; Showstack J; Ireland CC; Vittinghoff E; Hulley SB; Washington AE;
    Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Sep; 102(3):453-62. PubMed ID: 12962924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Clinical analysis of laproscopic classic intrafascial Semm hysterectomy in 86 patients].
    Huang FY; Fang XL; Lin QH; Liu F
    Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2004 Jun; 29(3):355-6. PubMed ID: 16136982
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Success of uterus-preserving treatments for abnormal uterine bleeding, chronic pelvic pain, and symptomatic fibroids: age and bridges to menopause.
    Learman LA; Nakagawa S; Gregorich SE; Jackson RA; Jacoby A; Kuppermann M
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Mar; 204(3):272.e1-7. PubMed ID: 21376169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Classic intrafascial supracervical hysterectomy (CISH): 10-year experience.
    Morrison JE; Jacobs VR
    JSLS; 2006; 10(1):26-9. PubMed ID: 16709352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. 437 classic intrafascial supracervical hysterectomies in 8 years.
    Morrison JE; Jacobs VR
    J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc; 2001 Nov; 8(4):558-67. PubMed ID: 11677337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A new approach to hysterectomy without colpotomy: pelviscopic intrafascial hysterectomy.
    Vietz PF; Ahn TS
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Feb; 170(2):609-13. PubMed ID: 8116722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Endoscopic subtotal hysterectomy without colpotomy: classic intrafascial SEMM hysterectomy. A new method of hysterectomy by pelviscopy, laparotomy, per vaginam or functionally by total uterine mucosal ablation.
    Semm K
    Int Surg; 1996; 81(4):362-70. PubMed ID: 9127796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Alternatives to hysterectomy for benign conditions.
    Scialli AR
    Int J Fertil Womens Med; 1998; 43(4):186-91. PubMed ID: 9726846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Histologic features of the CISH procedure.
    Alvarez-Rodas E; Mettler L; Castro E; Lüttges J; Semm K
    J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc; 1994 Nov; 2(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 9050531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy with transcervical morcellation: initial experience.
    Rosenblatt P; Makai G; DiSciullo A
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(3):331-6. PubMed ID: 20417424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Minilaparotomy hysterectomy: a valid option for the treatment of benign uterine pathologies.
    Panici PB; Zullo MA; Angioli R; Muzii L
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2005 Apr; 119(2):228-31. PubMed ID: 15808385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy with suturing technique.
    Sadik S; Uran B; Ozaydin T
    J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc; 1995 Aug; 2(4):437-40. PubMed ID: 9050599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The initial worcester experience with laparoscopic hysterectomy.
    Angle HS; Cohen SM; Hidlebaugh D
    J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc; 1995 Feb; 2(2):155-61. PubMed ID: 9050550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Risk factors for postoperative urinary retention after laparoscopic and robotic hysterectomy for benign indications.
    Smorgick N; DeLancey J; Patzkowsky K; Advincula A; Song A; As-Sanie S
    Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Sep; 120(3):581-6. PubMed ID: 22914467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of a gynecologist-interventional radiologist relationship on selection of treatment modality for the patient with uterine myoma.
    Zurawin RK; Fischer JH; Amir L
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(2):214-21. PubMed ID: 20226411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.