These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9050697)

  • 1. A new, radially expanding access system for laparoscopic procedures versus conventional cannulas.
    Turner DJ
    J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc; 1996 Aug; 3(4):609-15. PubMed ID: 9050697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reduction of cannula-related laparoscopic complications using a radially expanding access device.
    Galen DI; Jacobson A; Weckstein LN; Kaplan RA; DeNevi KL
    J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc; 1999 Feb; 6(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 9971857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A randomized prospective study of radially expanding trocars in laparoscopic surgery.
    Bhoyrul S; Payne J; Steffes B; Swanstrom L; Way LW
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2000; 4(4):392-7. PubMed ID: 11058851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reduction of laparoscopic-induced hypothermia, postoperative pain and recovery room length of stay by pre-conditioning gas with the Insuflow device: a prospective randomized controlled multi-center study.
    Ott DE; Reich H; Love B; McCorvey R; Toledo A; Liu CY; Syed R; Kumar K
    JSLS; 1998; 2(4):321-9. PubMed ID: 10036122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Radially expanding trocar: a less painful alternative for laparoscopic surgery.
    Lam TY; Lee SW; So HS; Kwok SP
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2000 Oct; 10(5):269-73. PubMed ID: 11071407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Radially expanding dilatation. A superior method of laparoscopic trocar access.
    Bhoyrul S; Mori T; Way LW
    Surg Endosc; 1996 Jul; 10(7):775-8. PubMed ID: 8662440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Minimizing ancillary ports size in gynecologic laparoscopy: a randomized trial.
    Ghezzi F; Cromi A; Colombo G; Uccella S; Bergamini V; Serati M; Bolis P
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2005; 12(6):480-5. PubMed ID: 16337574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Randomized double-masked comparison of radially expanding access device and conventional cutting tip trocar in laparoscopy.
    Yim SF; Yuen PM
    Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Mar; 97(3):435-8. PubMed ID: 11239652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy using a percutaneous surgical system: a pilot study towards scarless surgery.
    Rossitto C; Gueli Alletti S; Rotolo S; Cianci S; Panico G; Scambia G
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Aug; 203():132-5. PubMed ID: 27289066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A cost-effectiveness evaluation of laparoscopic disposable versus nondisposable infraumbilical cannulas.
    Ransom SB; McNeeley SG; White C; Diamond MP
    J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc; 1996 Nov; 4(1):25-8. PubMed ID: 9050707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Surgical time and severity of postoperative pain in dogs undergoing laparoscopic ovariectomy with one, two, or three instrument cannulas.
    Case JB; Marvel SJ; Boscan P; Monnet EL
    J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2011 Jul; 239(2):203-8. PubMed ID: 21756175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Postoperative pain after conventional laparoscopic versus single-port sleeve gastrectomy: a prospective, randomized, controlled pilot study.
    Morales-Conde S; Del Agua IA; Moreno AB; Macías MS
    Surg Obes Relat Dis; 2017 Apr; 13(4):608-613. PubMed ID: 28159565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Overcoming technical difficulties with single-port access laparoscopic surgery in gynecology: using conventional laparoscopic instruments.
    Paek J; Nam EJ; Kim YT; Kim SW
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2011 Mar; 21(2):137-41. PubMed ID: 21284515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Female sterilisation: a cohort controlled comparative study of ESSURE versus laparoscopic sterilisation.
    Duffy S; Marsh F; Rogerson L; Hudson H; Cooper K; Jack S; Hunter D; Philips G
    BJOG; 2005 Nov; 112(11):1522-8. PubMed ID: 16225573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Randomized trial comparing a radially expandable needle system with cutting trocars.
    Feste JR; Bojahr B; Turner DJ
    JSLS; 2000; 4(1):11-5. PubMed ID: 10772522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A trocarless, reusable, visual-access cannula for safer laparoscopy; an update.
    Ternamian AM
    J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc; 1998 May; 5(2):197-201. PubMed ID: 9564072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A prospective comparison of postoperative pain and quality of life in robotic assisted vs conventional laparoscopic gynecologic surgery.
    Zechmeister JR; Pua TL; Boyd LR; Blank SV; Curtin JP; Pothuri B
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Feb; 212(2):194.e1-7. PubMed ID: 25108142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Is single-port access laparoscopy less painful than conventional laparoscopy for adnexal surgery? A comparison of postoperative pain and surgical outcomes.
    Yim GW; Lee M; Nam EJ; Kim S; Kim YT; Kim SW
    Surg Innov; 2013 Feb; 20(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 22410390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The use of expanding ports in laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery may cause more pain: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.
    Dressler J; Jorgensen LN
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Nov; 31(11):4400-4411. PubMed ID: 28364149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery using conventional laparoscopic instruments and glove port technique in gynecology: a single surgeon's experience.
    Yang YS; Oh KY; Hur MH; Kim SY; Yim HS
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015 Jan; 22(1):87-93. PubMed ID: 25051536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.