296 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9051222)
1. The future of imaging support by clinical engineering departments. Interview by John Hughes.
Hertzler L; Plasse R; Roman M; Spears J; Speth T
Biomed Instrum Technol; 1997; 31(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 9051222
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Validating medical equipment repair and maintenance metrics, Part II: Results of the 1997 survey.
Cohen T
Biomed Instrum Technol; 1998; 32(2):136-44. PubMed ID: 9559110
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Validating medical equipment repair and maintenance metrics: a progress report.
Cohen T
Biomed Instrum Technol; 1997; 31(1):23-32. PubMed ID: 9051223
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The central equipment pool, an opportunity for improved technology management.
Gentles WM
Biomed Instrum Technol; 2000; 34(3):213-6. PubMed ID: 10868263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evolution of a successful quality management program for biomedical engineering.
Collins JT; Dysko J
Biomed Instrum Technol; 1993; 27(4):298-302. PubMed ID: 8369864
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Medical imaging equipment service in Kaiser Permanente, Northern California.
Plasse RJ; Brooks WG
J Clin Eng; 1993; 18(5):403-11. PubMed ID: 10129805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [The computerized radiologic department--an imminent possibility?].
Nilsson U; Tylén U
Lakartidningen; 1985 Feb; 82(9):726-9. PubMed ID: 3982173
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Going green: what you can do to help.
Brady JL
Biomed Instrum Technol; 2007; 41(5):351-2, 354-9. PubMed ID: 17992795
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Telemedical imaging--the diagnostic imaging department's perspective.
Pilon JA
Can J Med Radiat Technol; 1989 Dec; 20(3):155-65. PubMed ID: 10313398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Know how to manage your service contracts. The view from a single facility.
Gibson D; Jergenson D
Mater Manag Health Care; 1995 Sep; 4(9):37. PubMed ID: 10151139
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The advantages of: aftermarket parts.
Mirsberger B
Biomed Instrum Technol; 2011; 45(6):459-61. PubMed ID: 22107469
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The risks of: aftermarket parts.
Baird P
Biomed Instrum Technol; 2011; 45(6):458, 462-3. PubMed ID: 22107468
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Outsourcing for technological strength.
Gibson D; Jergenson D
Adm Radiol J; 1996 Aug; 15(8):34-5. PubMed ID: 10162799
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Equipment maintenance: a cost comparison of vendor and inhouse service.
Rossi RP
Radiol Manage; 1989; 11(4):28-34. PubMed ID: 10296607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. In-house management of diagnostic imaging equipment.
van der Putten WJ; Cooney P; Moran B; Molloy M; Malone JF
Med Biol Eng Comput; 1994 Nov; 32(6):664-9. PubMed ID: 7723427
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [From the Roentgen Department to the Institute of Diagnostic Imaging?].
Radiologe; 1985 Nov; 25(11):540-5. PubMed ID: 4089169
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Purchasing medical imaging equipment.
Gray JE; Morin RL
Radiology; 1989 Apr; 171(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 2494684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Lovelace simplifies, saves big with single-source imaging equipment service contract.
Health Care Cost Reengineering Rep; 1997 Nov; 2(11):170-2. PubMed ID: 10173918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical engineering cannot do benchmarking.
Stiefel R
Biomed Instrum Technol; 1997; 31(3):286-8. PubMed ID: 9181248
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Maintenance cost control of high technology hospital equipment.
Bluemke DH
Radiol Manage; 1983 Dec; 6(1):2-3. PubMed ID: 10265546
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
