These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9051530)

  • 1. Effect of folding on the optical quality of soft acrylic intraocular lenses.
    Oshika T; Shiokawa Y
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 1996; 22 Suppl 2():1360-4. PubMed ID: 9051530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Scanning electron microscopic study of 12 lenses of two types of soft acrylic intraocular lenses].
    Hesse Y; Freissler KA; Lang GK
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2001 Oct; 218(10):682-7. PubMed ID: 11706385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Optical performance of hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lenses with surface light scattering.
    Ogura Y; Ong MD; Akinay A; Carson DR; Pei R; Karakelle M
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2014 Jan; 40(1):104-13. PubMed ID: 24355723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Optical quality measurements of hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lenses.
    Sakuraba T
    J Refract Surg; 2006 Oct; 22(8):824-6. PubMed ID: 17061722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Light scattering, straylight, and optical quality in hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lenses with subsurface nanoglistenings.
    Werner L; Stover JC; Schwiegerling J; Das KK
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2016 Jan; 42(1):148-56. PubMed ID: 26948790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Scanning electron microscopic analysis of foldable acrylic and hydrogel intraocular lenses.
    Kohnen T; Magdowski G; Koch DD
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 1996; 22 Suppl 2():1342-50. PubMed ID: 9051527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Imaging quality of intraocular lenses.
    Rawer R; Stork W; Spraul CW; Lingenfelder C
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 Aug; 31(8):1618-31. PubMed ID: 16129302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Alterations to the AcrySof intraocular lens during folding.
    Milazzo S; Turut P; Blin H
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 1996; 22 Suppl 2():1351-4. PubMed ID: 9051528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Optical quality differences between three multifocal intraocular lenses: bifocal low add, bifocal moderate add, and trifocal.
    Madrid-Costa D; Ruiz-Alcocer J; Ferrer-Blasco T; García-Lázaro S; Montés-Micó R
    J Refract Surg; 2013 Nov; 29(11):749-54. PubMed ID: 24203806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In vitro optical quality of monofocal aspheric toric intraocular lenses: effect of cylindrical power.
    Ferrer-Blasco T; Domínguez-Vicent A; García-Lázaro S; Diez MA; Alfonso JF; Esteve-Taboada JJ
    Int Ophthalmol; 2018 Jun; 38(3):933-941. PubMed ID: 28444524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Retinal image quality after microincision intraocular lens implantation.
    Alió JL; Schimchak P; Montés-Micó R; Galal A
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 Aug; 31(8):1557-60. PubMed ID: 16129291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Determining the imaging quality of intraocular lenses.
    Norrby NE; Grossman LW; Geraghty EP; Kreiner CF; Mihori M; Patel AS; Portney V; Silberman DM
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 1998 May; 24(5):703-14. PubMed ID: 9610458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Folding procedure for acrylic intraocular lenses.
    Mencucci R; Dei R; Danielli D; Susini M; Menchini U
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Feb; 30(2):457-63. PubMed ID: 15030842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In vitro comparison of glistening formation among hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lenses(1).
    Gregori NZ; Spencer TS; Mamalis N; Olson RJ
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2002 Jul; 28(7):1262-8. PubMed ID: 12106738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Image quality with multifocal intraocular lenses and the effect of pupil size: comparison of refractive and hybrid refractive-diffractive designs.
    Artigas JM; Menezo JL; Peris C; Felipe A; Díaz-Llopis M
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Dec; 33(12):2111-7. PubMed ID: 18053913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The impact of glistenings on the optical quality of a hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lens.
    Weindler JN; Łabuz G; Yildirim TM; Tandogan T; Khoramnia R; Auffarth GU
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2019 Jul; 45(7):1020-1025. PubMed ID: 31003800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of the optical and visual quality of poly(methyl methacrylate) and silicone intraocular lenses.
    Knorz MC; Lang A; Hsia TC; Poepel B; Seiberth V; Liesenhoff H
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 1993 Nov; 19(6):766-71. PubMed ID: 8271174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of glistenings on the optical quality of acrylic foldable intraocular lens.
    Oshika T; Shiokawa Y; Amano S; Mitomo K
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2001 Sep; 85(9):1034-7. PubMed ID: 11520749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of intraocular lenses with different diopters on chromatic aberrations in human eye models.
    Song H; Yuan X; Tang X
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2016 Jan; 16():9. PubMed ID: 26754111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Visual significance of glistenings seen in the AcrySof intraocular lens.
    Dhaliwal DK; Mamalis N; Olson RJ; Crandall AS; Zimmerman P; Alldredge OC; Durcan FJ; Omar O
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 1996 May; 22(4):452-7. PubMed ID: 8733849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.