These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9051598)

  • 1. Influence of adhesive systems on the bonding of dental amalgam to glass ionomer cement.
    Nobilo MA; Consani S; de Goes MF
    J Prosthet Dent; 1997 Feb; 77(2):127-30. PubMed ID: 9051598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bonded amalgam restorations: a comparative study of glass-ionomer and resin adhesives.
    al-Moayad M; Aboush YE; Elderton RJ
    Br Dent J; 1993 Nov; 175(10):363-7. PubMed ID: 8257646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bonded amalgam restorations: using a glass-ionomer as an adhesive liner.
    Chen RS; Liu CC; Cheng MR; Lin CP
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 11203849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Posterior resin composite restorations with or without resin-modified, glass-ionomer cement lining: a 1-year randomized, clinical trial.
    Banomyong D; Harnirattisai C; Burrow MF
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2011 Feb; 2(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 25427330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Microleakage of bonded amalgam restorations using different adhesive agents with dye under vacuum: an in vitro study.
    Parolia A; Kundabala M; Gupta V; Verma M; Batra C; Shenoy R; Srikant N
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(2):252-5. PubMed ID: 21891895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of flowable composite liner and glass ionomer liner on class II gingival marginal adaptation of direct composite restorations with different bonding strategies.
    Aggarwal V; Singla M; Yadav S; Yadav H
    J Dent; 2014 May; 42(5):619-25. PubMed ID: 24631232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of storage and acid etching on the tensile bond strength of composite resins to glass ionomer cement.
    Mesquita MF; Domitti SS; Consani S; de Goes MF
    Braz Dent J; 1999; 10(1):5-9. PubMed ID: 10863383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of bonded amalgam restorations on the fracture strength of teeth.
    Oliveira JP; Cochran MA; Moore BK
    Oper Dent; 1996; 21(3):110-5. PubMed ID: 9002870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of dental adhesive systems with amalgam and resin composite restorations: comparison of microleakage and bond strength results.
    Neme AL; Evans DB; Maxson BB
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(6):512-9. PubMed ID: 11203864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of an adhesive resin luting agent on the dowel-head retention of three different core materials.
    Aksoy G; Cotert HS; Korkut L
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 May; 93(5):439-45. PubMed ID: 15867753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bond strength of glass-ionomer cement and composite resin combinations.
    Oilo G; Um CM
    Quintessence Int; 1992 Sep; 23(9):633-9. PubMed ID: 1287716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. In vitro shear bond strength of cementing agents to fixed prosthodontic restorative materials.
    Piwowarczyk A; Lauer HC; Sorensen JA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Sep; 92(3):265-73. PubMed ID: 15343162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Tensile bond strengths of five luting agents to two CAD-CAM restorative materials and enamel.
    Chang JC; Hart DA; Estey AW; Chan JT
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Jul; 90(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 12869970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Long-term durability of adhesive systems bonded to fresh amalgam.
    Pilo R; Brosh T; Shapinko E; Dodiuk H
    J Prosthet Dent; 1996 Oct; 76(4):431-6. PubMed ID: 8897302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Shear bond strength of dental amalgam bonded to dentin.
    Covey DA; Moon PC
    Am J Dent; 1991 Feb; 4(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 1900693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Amalgam restorations: a new approach.
    al-Duwairi Y; Hadj-Hamou R
    J Prosthet Dent; 1993 Feb; 69(2):138-40. PubMed ID: 8429504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fracture resistance of composite and amalgam cores retained by pins coated with new adhesive resins.
    Tjan AH; Dunn JR; Grant BE
    J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Jun; 67(6):752-60. PubMed ID: 1403855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bonding dental amalgam to a light-curing glass-ionomer liner/base.
    Aboush YE; Elderton RJ
    Br Dent J; 1991 Mar; 170(6):219-22. PubMed ID: 2021495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of bracket debonding force between two conventional resin adhesives and a resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement: an in vitro and in vivo study.
    Shammaa I; Ngan P; Kim H; Kao E; Gladwin M; Gunel E; Brown C
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Oct; 69(5):463-9. PubMed ID: 10515145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mechanical retention versus bonding of amalgam and gallium alloy restorations.
    Eakle WS; Staninec M; Yip RL; Chavez MA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1994 Oct; 72(4):351-4. PubMed ID: 7990038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.