These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
24. Practical applications of a computed tomography system for predictable implant placement. Roberts J; Roberts M Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2008 Jul; 20(6):372-6. PubMed ID: 18777706 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. A stent for presurgical evaluation of implant placement. Takeshita F; Tokoshima T; Suetsugu T J Prosthet Dent; 1997 Jan; 77(1):36-8. PubMed ID: 9029463 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Implants placement using a novel computerized tactile imaging navigation system]. Tal H; Shohat M Refuat Hapeh Vehashinayim (1993); 2005 Jan; 22(1):19-26, 84. PubMed ID: 15786656 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Technology makes a complicated implant restoration simple. Kosinski T Dent Today; 2011 Sep; 30(9):128, 130, 132-5. PubMed ID: 21980729 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. The use of interactive computed tomography to predict the esthetic and functional demands of implant-supported prostheses. Rosenfeld AL; Mecall RA Compend Contin Educ Dent; 1996 Dec; 17(12):1125-8, 1130-2 passim; quiz 1146. PubMed ID: 9161128 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The role of computerized tomography in dental implantology. Williams MY; Mealey BL; Hallmon WW Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1992; 7(3):373-80. PubMed ID: 1289264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Effect of over- and underexposure on the sharpness of the image of a marker in computer-assisted dental implant tomography. Thunthy KH Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Jul; 31(4):278-80. PubMed ID: 12087446 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]