These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9051939)

  • 1. The use of non-ISO-tapered instruments for canal flaring.
    Weine FS
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 1996 Jul; 17(7):651-6, 658-60, 662-3; quiz 664. PubMed ID: 9051939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An in vivo evaluation of two types of files used to accurately determine the diameter of the apical constriction of a root canal: an in vivo study.
    Darda S; Manwar N; Chandak M; Shori DD
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 Jul; 10(4):43-50. PubMed ID: 19575053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison in vivo of the first tapered and nontapered instruments that bind at the apical constriction.
    Kfir A; Rosenberg E; Fuss Z
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Sep; 102(3):395-8. PubMed ID: 16920549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative study of the variability of 0.06 tapered rotary endodontic files to current taper standards.
    Hatch GW; Roberts S; Joyce AP; Runner R; McPherson JC
    J Endod; 2008 Apr; 34(4):463-5. PubMed ID: 18358898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The quality of apical canal preparation using hand and rotary instruments with specific criteria for enlargement based on initial apical file size.
    Tan BT; Messer HH
    J Endod; 2002 Sep; 28(9):658-64. PubMed ID: 12236311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cross-sectional configuration of endodontic files compared with manufacturers' design.
    D'Souza JE; Walton RE; Maixner D
    J Endod; 1995 Dec; 21(12):599-602. PubMed ID: 8596080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical relevance of standardization of endodontic files dimensions according to the ISO 3630-1 specification.
    Zinelis S; Magnissalis EA; Margelos J; Lambrianidis T
    J Endod; 2002 May; 28(5):367-70. PubMed ID: 12026921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The standardized-taper root canal preparation, Part 1: Concepts for variably tapered shaping instruments.
    Buchanan LS
    Dent Today; 1998 May; 17(5):54-60. PubMed ID: 9796468
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The standardized-taper root canal preparation, Part 1: Concepts for variably tapered shaping instruments.
    Buchanan LS
    Dent Today; 1999 Feb; 18(2):78-86. PubMed ID: 10765815
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Taper and stiffness of sonic endodontic files.
    Lumley PJ; Harrington E; Walmsley AD; Marquis PM
    Endod Dent Traumatol; 1996 Apr; 12(2):77-81. PubMed ID: 9028201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Best of both worlds: stainless steel and nickel titanium.
    Klein P
    Dent Today; 1999 Jul; 18(7):66-9. PubMed ID: 10786173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dimensional characterization and mechanical behaviour of K3 rotary instruments.
    Melo MC; Pereira ES; Viana AC; Fonseca AM; Buono VT; Bahia MG
    Int Endod J; 2008 Apr; 41(4):329-38. PubMed ID: 18217988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Root canal preparation for obturation using nickel-titanium mechanical devices].
    Fazekas A
    Fogorv Sz; 1998; 91(8-9):241-6. PubMed ID: 9729665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The efficacy of ultrasonic irrigation to remove artificially placed dentine debris from human root canals prepared using instruments of varying taper.
    van der Sluis LW; Wu MK; Wesselink PR
    Int Endod J; 2005 Oct; 38(10):764-8. PubMed ID: 16164691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [In vitro comparison of instruments used for root canal preparation. II. Effectiveness of the instruments].
    Bartha K; Dobó NC; Bernáth M; Szabó J
    Fogorv Sz; 1995 Aug; 88(8):261-9. PubMed ID: 8522021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of two endodontic handpieces during the preparation of root canals in extracted human teeth.
    Smith RB; Edmunds DH
    Int Endod J; 1998 Jan; 31(1):22-31. PubMed ID: 9823125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [In vitro comparison of instruments for root canal preparation. III. Study of the instruments from the viewpoint of shaping asymmetry].
    Bartha K; Dobó NC; Bernáth M; Szabó J
    Fogorv Sz; 1995 Oct; 88(10):319-29. PubMed ID: 8521999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Penetration depth of warm vertical Gutta-Percha pluggers: impact of apical preparation.
    Diemer F; Sinan A; Calas P
    J Endod; 2006 Feb; 32(2):123-6. PubMed ID: 16427459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dynamic and cyclic fatigue of engine-driven rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instruments.
    Haïkel Y; Serfaty R; Bateman G; Senger B; Allemann C
    J Endod; 1999 Jun; 25(6):434-40. PubMed ID: 10530246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy of two root canal length measurement devices integrated into rotary endodontic motors when removing gutta-percha from root-filled teeth.
    Uzun O; Topuz O; Tinaz C; Nekoofar MH; Dummer PM
    Int Endod J; 2008 Sep; 41(9):725-32. PubMed ID: 18637852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.