These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9052767)

  • 41. The business of research.
    Krimsky S; Hubbard R
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1995; 25(1):41-3. PubMed ID: 7730052
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. To ban or not to ban?
    Gorman C
    Time; 1997 Jun; 149(24):66. PubMed ID: 11656687
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Time to break down taboos about infertility.
    Templeton AA
    New Sci; 1985 Jan; 105(1438):39. PubMed ID: 11658552
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Liberty, identity, and human cloning.
    Robertson JA
    Tex Law Rev; 1998 May; 76(6):1371-456. PubMed ID: 11660439
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. New techniques in the field of human fertilization and embryology.
    Council of Europe. Parliamentary Assembly
    Hum Reprod; 1986 Jun; 1(4):271-6. PubMed ID: 11643963
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Why Warnock's 14-day rule may be unworkable.
    Connor S
    New Sci; 1985 Jan; 105(1438):6. PubMed ID: 11658553
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Why experiment on human embryos?
    Vines G
    New Sci; 1989 Nov; 124(1689):48-50. PubMed ID: 11659163
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Politicians squabble over stem-cell research.
    Rovner J
    Lancet; 1999 Jun; 353(9168):1948. PubMed ID: 11660637
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Embryo research panel ignites debate.
    Fackelmann KA
    Sci News; 1994 Oct; 146(14):212. PubMed ID: 11659875
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Federal embryo research is backed: ethicists see benefits overriding qualms.
    Weiss R
    Washington Post; 1999 May; ():A1, A16. PubMed ID: 11648116
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Human embryo research.
    White RJ
    America (NY); 1996 Sep; 175(6):4-5. PubMed ID: 11660278
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Cloning and the U.S. Congress.
    Annas GJ
    N Engl J Med; 2002 May; 346(20):1599-602. PubMed ID: 11994549
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Europe/Japan face up to legal hurdles to cloning.
    Michael A
    Nat Biotechnol; 1997 Jul; 15(7):609-10. PubMed ID: 9219253
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Cloning for research 'should be allowed'.
    Wadman M
    Nature; 1997 Jul; 388(6637):6. PubMed ID: 9214486
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. France is urged to loosen ban on embryo research.
    Butler D
    Nature; 1997 May; 387(6630):218. PubMed ID: 9153377
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Commons debates Warnock report.
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1984 Dec; 289(6458):1639. PubMed ID: 11652438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The start of a long debate on the Warnock report.
    Deitch R
    Lancet; 1984 Jul; 2(8396):238. PubMed ID: 11644288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Parliament gives overwhelming approval to embryo research.
    Coghlan A
    New Sci; 1990 Apr; 126(1714):29. PubMed ID: 11655969
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Rules due on disputed embryo research.
    Angier N
    N Y Times Web; 1994 Sep; ():C1, C10. PubMed ID: 11647977
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Japan proposes ban on human cloning.
    Watts J
    Lancet; 1998 Aug; 352(9126):465. PubMed ID: 11656950
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.