These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9052767)

  • 81. Mammalian genome debate heats up.
    Marshall E
    Science; 1997 Mar; 275(5307):1733. PubMed ID: 9122675
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 82. From Asilomar to industrial biotechnology: risks, reductionism and regulation.
    Krimsky S
    Sci Cult (Lond); 2005 Dec; 14(4):309-23. PubMed ID: 16619467
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 83. Australia stops short of a ban on therapeutic cloning.
    Nowak R
    New Sci; 2001 Sep; 171(2310):11. PubMed ID: 11838486
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 84. 'Reprogenetics': hype, phobia and choice: an unreserved advocate of new reproductive technologies argues his case.
    Gillott J
    Conscience; 2003-2004 Winter; 24(4):10-4. PubMed ID: 16459388
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 85. Consultation rejects human reproductive cloning.
    Human Genetics Advisory Commission
    Hum Reprod Genet Ethics; 1999; 5(2):21-3. PubMed ID: 12156806
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 86. Embryo research.
    Carvel J
    Lancet; 1988 Feb; 1(8581):368-9. PubMed ID: 11644347
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 87. UK government looks to expand research on embryos.
    Ramsay S
    Lancet; 2000 Nov; 356(9244):1825. PubMed ID: 11117922
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 88. Cabinet reshuffle demotes British science.
    Dean M
    Lancet; 1995 Jul; 346(8969):238. PubMed ID: 7616806
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 89. Embryo research: yes or no?
    Braude P; Johnson M
    BMJ; 1989 Dec; 299(6712):1349-51. PubMed ID: 2513957
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 90. Embryo research and abortion.
    Nature; 1989 Oct; 341(6244):673. PubMed ID: 2627213
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 91. Put it to the vote.
    Coghlan A; Boyce N
    New Sci; 2000 Aug; 167(2252):4-5. PubMed ID: 11995729
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 92. Time to lift embryo research ban.
    Nature; 1998 Nov; 396(6707):97. PubMed ID: 9823873
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 93. Rüttgers and Chirac seek cloning ban.
    Butler D; Schiermeier Q
    Nature; 1997 May; 387(6629):111. PubMed ID: 9144269
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 94. Little lamb, who made thee? A letter from Edinburgh.
    Boyd KM
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1998; 7(2):199-202. PubMed ID: 9532398
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 95. Cloning research a possibility.
    Cimons M
    Nat Med; 1997 Jul; 3(7):710. PubMed ID: 9244605
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 96. European parliament wants world ban on human cloning.
    Watson R
    BMJ; 1997 Mar; 314(7084):847. PubMed ID: 9093090
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 97. Clerics urge ban on altering germline cells.
    Norman C
    Science; 1983 Jun; 220(4604):1360-1. PubMed ID: 6574603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 98. Embryo report opens old wounds.
    Biggin S
    Science; 1996 Jul; 273(5272):177. PubMed ID: 8668991
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 99. Blair's blunder: it can't be much fun being a member of an expert committee.
    New Sci; 1999 Jul; 162(2193):3. PubMed ID: 11657934
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 100. Significant developments in stem cell research. Conclusion.
    Scottish Council on Human Bioethics
    J Int Bioethique; 2005; 16(3-4):164. PubMed ID: 17048372
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.