157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9053299)
1. [Court-ordered appraisal of surgical responsibility].
Chirurgie; 1996; 121(7):505-74. PubMed ID: 9053299
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [The expert's report in an administrative court].
Petit M
Chirurgie; 1996; 121(7):526-7. PubMed ID: 9053301
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Interpretation of the expert's report in a civil court].
Guigue J
Chirurgie; 1996; 121(7):522-5. PubMed ID: 9053300
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [The lawyer's interpretation of the expert's report].
Fabre H
Chirurgie; 1996; 121(7):528-35. PubMed ID: 9053302
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [The Medical Council and expertise on surgical responsibility].
Glorion B
Chirurgie; 1996; 121(7):519-21. PubMed ID: 9035474
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Surgeons find themselves on trial in forum featuring CMPA lawyers.
Silversides A
CMAJ; 1999 May; 160(9):1358-9. PubMed ID: 10333845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Common misconceptions among surgeons named in malpractice cases.
Cassidy JD; Welti MK
J Med Pract Manage; 2004; 20(2):109-10. PubMed ID: 15523780
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [The surgeon and the law. Legal responsibility. Significance of a contract which has performance of medical acts as object].
Thiry E
Acta Chir Belg; 1998; 98(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 9538918
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Responsibility in laparoscopic surgery: current situation viewed by the expert].
Aubert J
J Chir (Paris); 1996; 133(8):358-9. PubMed ID: 9296000
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Liability pilot survey examines claims, expert witnesses.
Nora PF; Karnell LH
Bull Am Coll Surg; 1990 Apr; 75(4):16-9. PubMed ID: 10104319
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [The responsibility of the surgeon for the actions of operating room personnel in the light of Toro Aponte vs ELA].
Iturregui-Pagán JR
Bol Asoc Med P R; 1997; 89(10-12):208-10. PubMed ID: 9577059
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Surgery responsibilities and costs].
Gerson C; Bons-Letouzey C; Sicot C
Ann Chir; 2001 May; 126(4):346-54. PubMed ID: 11413816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [A critical analysis of 79 claims for damages following surgical treatment (author's transl)].
Guillet R
Chirurgie; 1980 Mar 19-Apr 23; 106(4):245-51. PubMed ID: 7408589
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Lawsuits against surgeons in XVIIth-century Lorraine].
Carolus J
Rev Prat; 2001 Apr; 51(8):821-4. PubMed ID: 11387682
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Guidelines in surgery: from the viewpoint of the surgical expert].
Carstensen G
Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl Kongressbd; 1997; 114():79-82. PubMed ID: 9574102
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Brief instructions for the use of expertise by stomatologists and maxillofacial surgeons--Part 2. Expertise in physical harm and medical responsibility].
Rougé-Maillart C; Penneau M
Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac; 2003 Jun; 104(3):144-8. PubMed ID: 12931065
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Expert testimony: a perspective from the trenches.
Hawkins TS
J Am Coll Radiol; 2005 Feb; 2(2):126-30. PubMed ID: 17411781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [The surgeon, the expert, the judge].
Vayre P
Bull Acad Natl Med; 1996 Dec; 180(9):2149-58; discussion 2158-61. PubMed ID: 9182002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [The surgeon and his environment--surgery and the law].
Weissauer W
Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl Kongressbd; 1997; 114():768-73. PubMed ID: 9574263
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Medical expert assessment in criminal processes from the legal viewpoint].
Ulsenheimer K
Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1996 Nov; 90(7):574-81. PubMed ID: 9064925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
