256 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9054896)
1. Benchmark test cases for evaluation of computer-based methods for detection of setup errors: realistic digitally reconstructed electronic portal images with known setup errors.
Fritsch DS; Raghavan S; Boxwala A; Earnhart J; Tracton G; Cullip T; Chaney EL
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1997 Jan; 37(1):199-204. PubMed ID: 9054896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Thresholds for human detection of patient setup errors in digitally reconstructed portal images of prostate fields.
Phillips BL; Jiroutek MR; Tracton G; Elfervig M; Muller KE; Chaney EL
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2002 Sep; 54(1):270-7. PubMed ID: 12183001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Core-based portal image registration for automatic radiotherapy treatment verification.
Fritsch DS; Chaney EL; Boxwala A; McAuliffe MJ; Raghavan S; Thall A; Earnhart JR
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1995 Dec; 33(5):1287-300. PubMed ID: 7493854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Registration of electronic portal images for patient set-up verification.
Matsopoulos GK; Asvestas PA; Delibasis KK; Kouloulias V; Uzunoglu N; Karaiskos P; Sandilos P
Phys Med Biol; 2004 Jul; 49(14):3279-89. PubMed ID: 15357197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An image correlation procedure for digitally reconstructed radiographs and electronic portal images.
Dong L; Boyer AL
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1995 Dec; 33(5):1053-60. PubMed ID: 7493831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Breast patient setup error assessment: comparison of electronic portal image devices and cone-beam computed tomography matching results.
Topolnjak R; Sonke JJ; Nijkamp J; Rasch C; Minkema D; Remeijer P; van Vliet-Vroegindeweij C
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2010 Nov; 78(4):1235-43. PubMed ID: 20472368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Detection of patient setup errors with a portal image - DRR registration software application.
Sutherland K; Ishikawa M; Bengua G; Ito YM; Miyamoto Y; Shirato H
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2011 Feb; 12(3):3492. PubMed ID: 21844862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Automatic three-dimensional inspection of patient setup in radiation therapy using portal images, simulator images, and computed tomography data.
Gilhuijs KG; van de Ven PJ; van Herk M
Med Phys; 1996 Mar; 23(3):389-99. PubMed ID: 8815382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of daily image guidance for hypofractionated liver radiotherapy with active breathing control.
Dawson LA; Eccles C; Bissonnette JP; Brock KK
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Jul; 62(4):1247-52. PubMed ID: 15990028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Simulation of 3D-treatment plans in head and neck tumors aided by matching of digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRR) and on-line distortion corrected simulator images.
Lohr F; Schramm O; Schraube P; Sroka-Perez G; Seeber S; Schlepple G; Schlegel W; Wannenmacher M
Radiother Oncol; 1997 Nov; 45(2):199-207. PubMed ID: 9424012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Computation of digitally reconstructed radiographs for use in radiotherapy treatment design.
Sherouse GW; Novins K; Chaney EL
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1990 Mar; 18(3):651-8. PubMed ID: 2318699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Portal imaging protocol for radical dose-escalated radiotherapy treatment of prostate cancer.
Mubata CD; Bidmead AM; Ellingham LM; Thompson V; Dearnaley DP
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1998 Jan; 40(1):221-31. PubMed ID: 9422580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Procedures for high precision setup verification and correction of lung cancer patients using CT-simulation and digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRR).
Van Sörnsen de Koste JR; de Boer HC; Schuchhard-Schipper RH; Senan S; Heijmen BJ
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2003 Mar; 55(3):804-10. PubMed ID: 12573768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Four-dimensional dose reconstruction through in vivo phase matching of cine images of electronic portal imaging device.
Yoon J; Jung JW; Kim JO; Yi BY; Yeo I
Med Phys; 2016 Jul; 43(7):4420. PubMed ID: 27370157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A software tool of digital tomosynthesis application for patient positioning in radiotherapy.
Yan H; Dai JR
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Mar; 17(2):174-193. PubMed ID: 27074482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. SU-E-J-26: Automated Estimation Method of Patient Setup Errors Using Simulated Portal Images for Prostate Cancer Radiotherapy.
Matsushita N; Arimura H; Shioyama Y; Magome T; Nakamura K; Umezu Y; Yoshitake T; Anai S; Yoshidome S; Honda H; Ohki M; Toyofuku F; Hirata H
Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6Part6):3658. PubMed ID: 28517569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of setup accuracy of three different image assessment methods for tangential breast radiotherapy.
Batumalai V; Phan P; Choong C; Holloway L; Delaney GP
J Med Radiat Sci; 2016 Dec; 63(4):224-231. PubMed ID: 27741383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessment of residual error for online cone-beam CT-guided treatment of prostate cancer patients.
Létourneau D; Martinez AA; Lockman D; Yan D; Vargas C; Ivaldi G; Wong J
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Jul; 62(4):1239-46. PubMed ID: 15913917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of computer workstation with light box for detecting setup errors from portal images.
Boxwala AA; Chaney EL; Fritsch DS; Raghavan S; Coffey CS; Major SA; Muller KE
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1999 Jun; 44(3):711-6. PubMed ID: 10348303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of geometric uncertainties using electronic portal imaging device in focal three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy using different head supports.
Budrukkar A; Dutta D; Sharma D; Yadav P; Dantas S; Jalali R
J Cancer Res Ther; 2008; 4(2):70-6. PubMed ID: 18688122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
