These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Registration of electronic portal images for patient set-up verification. Matsopoulos GK; Asvestas PA; Delibasis KK; Kouloulias V; Uzunoglu N; Karaiskos P; Sandilos P Phys Med Biol; 2004 Jul; 49(14):3279-89. PubMed ID: 15357197 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An image correlation procedure for digitally reconstructed radiographs and electronic portal images. Dong L; Boyer AL Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1995 Dec; 33(5):1053-60. PubMed ID: 7493831 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Breast patient setup error assessment: comparison of electronic portal image devices and cone-beam computed tomography matching results. Topolnjak R; Sonke JJ; Nijkamp J; Rasch C; Minkema D; Remeijer P; van Vliet-Vroegindeweij C Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2010 Nov; 78(4):1235-43. PubMed ID: 20472368 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Detection of patient setup errors with a portal image - DRR registration software application. Sutherland K; Ishikawa M; Bengua G; Ito YM; Miyamoto Y; Shirato H J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2011 Feb; 12(3):3492. PubMed ID: 21844862 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Automatic three-dimensional inspection of patient setup in radiation therapy using portal images, simulator images, and computed tomography data. Gilhuijs KG; van de Ven PJ; van Herk M Med Phys; 1996 Mar; 23(3):389-99. PubMed ID: 8815382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of daily image guidance for hypofractionated liver radiotherapy with active breathing control. Dawson LA; Eccles C; Bissonnette JP; Brock KK Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Jul; 62(4):1247-52. PubMed ID: 15990028 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Simulation of 3D-treatment plans in head and neck tumors aided by matching of digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRR) and on-line distortion corrected simulator images. Lohr F; Schramm O; Schraube P; Sroka-Perez G; Seeber S; Schlepple G; Schlegel W; Wannenmacher M Radiother Oncol; 1997 Nov; 45(2):199-207. PubMed ID: 9424012 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Computation of digitally reconstructed radiographs for use in radiotherapy treatment design. Sherouse GW; Novins K; Chaney EL Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1990 Mar; 18(3):651-8. PubMed ID: 2318699 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Procedures for high precision setup verification and correction of lung cancer patients using CT-simulation and digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRR). Van Sörnsen de Koste JR; de Boer HC; Schuchhard-Schipper RH; Senan S; Heijmen BJ Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2003 Mar; 55(3):804-10. PubMed ID: 12573768 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Four-dimensional dose reconstruction through in vivo phase matching of cine images of electronic portal imaging device. Yoon J; Jung JW; Kim JO; Yi BY; Yeo I Med Phys; 2016 Jul; 43(7):4420. PubMed ID: 27370157 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A software tool of digital tomosynthesis application for patient positioning in radiotherapy. Yan H; Dai JR J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Mar; 17(2):174-193. PubMed ID: 27074482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. SU-E-J-26: Automated Estimation Method of Patient Setup Errors Using Simulated Portal Images for Prostate Cancer Radiotherapy. Matsushita N; Arimura H; Shioyama Y; Magome T; Nakamura K; Umezu Y; Yoshitake T; Anai S; Yoshidome S; Honda H; Ohki M; Toyofuku F; Hirata H Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6Part6):3658. PubMed ID: 28517569 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of setup accuracy of three different image assessment methods for tangential breast radiotherapy. Batumalai V; Phan P; Choong C; Holloway L; Delaney GP J Med Radiat Sci; 2016 Dec; 63(4):224-231. PubMed ID: 27741383 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]