These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9055615)

  • 21. Effect of temporal constraints on hemispheric asymmetries during spatial frequency processing.
    Peyrin C; Mermillod M; Chokron S; Marendaz C
    Brain Cogn; 2006 Dec; 62(3):214-20. PubMed ID: 16837115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Hemispheric differences are found in the identification, but not the detection, of low versus high spatial frequencies.
    Kitterle FL; Christman S; Hellige JB
    Percept Psychophys; 1990 Oct; 48(4):297-306. PubMed ID: 2243753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Implicit identification of irrelevant local objects interacts with global/local processing of hierarchical stimuli.
    Poirel N; Pineau A; Mellet E
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2006 Jul; 122(3):321-36. PubMed ID: 16574048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Hemispheric differences for global and local processing: effect of stimulus size and sparsity.
    Blanca MJ; López-Montiel G
    Span J Psychol; 2009 May; 12(1):21-31. PubMed ID: 19476216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Effect of task difficulty on hemispheric differences in visual image processing].
    Hildebrandt H; Fresenborg I; Engel A
    Z Exp Psychol; 1995; 42(2):256-79. PubMed ID: 7497072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Hemispheric asymmetries for spatial frequency discrimination in a selective attention task.
    Proverbio AM; Zani A; Avella C
    Brain Cogn; 1997 Jul; 34(2):311-20. PubMed ID: 9220094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effects of blurring and stimulus size on the lateralized processing of nonverbal stimuli.
    Michimata C; Hellige JB
    Neuropsychologia; 1987; 25(2):397-407. PubMed ID: 3601044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Attentional zooming and the global-dominance phenomenon: effects of level-specific cueing and abrupt visual onset.
    Stoffer TH
    Psychol Res; 1994; 56(2):83-98. PubMed ID: 8153247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Global precedence, spatial frequency channels, and the statistics of natural images.
    Hughes HC; Nozawa G; Kitterle F
    J Cogn Neurosci; 1996; 8(3):197-230. PubMed ID: 23968149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Faces are "spatial"--holistic face perception is supported by low spatial frequencies.
    Goffaux V; Rossion B
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Aug; 32(4):1023-39. PubMed ID: 16846295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Relative size of global visual stimulus: advantage and interference.
    Amirkhiabani G
    Percept Mot Skills; 1998 Jun; 86(3 Pt 2):1427-41. PubMed ID: 9700823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The role of high spatial frequencies in hemispheric processing of categorical and coordinate spatial relations.
    Okubo M; Michimata C
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2004 Nov; 16(9):1576-82. PubMed ID: 15601520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Right hemispheric dominance in gaze-triggered reflexive shift of attention in humans.
    Okada T; Sato W; Toichi M
    Brain Cogn; 2006 Nov; 62(2):128-33. PubMed ID: 16730869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The influence of visual and phonological features on the hemispheric processing of hierarchical Navon letters.
    Aiello M; Merola S; Lasaponara S; Pinto M; Tomaiuolo F; Doricchi F
    Neuropsychologia; 2018 Jan; 109():75-85. PubMed ID: 29233717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of hemispheric asymmetry in global and local information processing and interference in divided and selective attention using spatial frequency filters.
    Yoshida T; Yoshino A; Takahashi Y; Nomura S
    Exp Brain Res; 2007 Aug; 181(3):519-29. PubMed ID: 17476490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Hemispheric asymmetry in the processing of high and low spatial frequencies: a facial recognition task.
    Keenan PA; Whitman RD; Pepe J
    Brain Cogn; 1989 Nov; 11(2):229-37. PubMed ID: 2803762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. New evidence for the perceptual precedence of global information.
    Peressotti F; Rumiati R; Nicoletti R; Job R
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1991 Aug; 77(1):35-46. PubMed ID: 1950635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The relationship between local and global processing and the processing of high and low spatial frequencies studied by event-related potentials and source modeling.
    Boeschoten MA; Kemner C; Kenemans JL; Engeland Hv
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Jul; 24(2):228-36. PubMed ID: 15993761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Who's got the global advantage? Visual field differences in processing of global and local shape.
    Gerlach C; Poirel N
    Cognition; 2020 Feb; 195():104131. PubMed ID: 31731118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The role of spatial frequency in the processing of hierarchically organized stimuli.
    Lamb MR; Yund EW
    Percept Psychophys; 1993 Dec; 54(6):773-84. PubMed ID: 8134247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.