These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9055622)

  • 1. Spectral restoration of speech: intelligibility is increased by inserting noise in spectral gaps.
    Warren RM; Hainsworth KR; Brubaker BS; Bashford JA; Healy EW
    Percept Psychophys; 1997 Feb; 59(2):275-83. PubMed ID: 9055622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Spectral redundancy: intelligibility of sentences heard through narrow spectral slits.
    Warren RM; Riener KR; Bashford JA; Brubaker BS
    Percept Psychophys; 1995 Feb; 57(2):175-82. PubMed ID: 7885815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Use of speech-modulated noise adds strong "bottom-up" cues for phonemic restoration.
    Bashford JA; Warren RM; Brown CA
    Percept Psychophys; 1996 Apr; 58(3):342-50. PubMed ID: 8935895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Frequency specificity of amplitude envelope patterns in noise-vocoded speech.
    Ueda K; Araki T; Nakajima Y
    Hear Res; 2018 Sep; 367():169-181. PubMed ID: 29929750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The roles of fundamental frequency contours and sentence context in Mandarin Chinese speech intelligibility.
    Wang J; Shu H; Zhang L; Liu Z; Zhang Y
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jul; 134(1):EL91-7. PubMed ID: 23862913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The intelligibility of noise-vocoded speech: spectral information available from across-channel comparison of amplitude envelopes.
    Roberts B; Summers RJ; Bailey PJ
    Proc Biol Sci; 2011 May; 278(1711):1595-600. PubMed ID: 21068039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Predicting speech intelligibility based on the signal-to-noise envelope power ratio after modulation-frequency selective processing.
    Jørgensen S; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1475-87. PubMed ID: 21895088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Increasing the intelligibility of speech through multiple phonemic restorations.
    Bashford JA; Riener KR; Warren RM
    Percept Psychophys; 1992 Mar; 51(3):211-7. PubMed ID: 1561046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effects of the addition of low-level, low-noise noise on the intelligibility of sentences processed to remove temporal envelope information.
    Hopkins K; Moore BC; Stone MA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Oct; 128(4):2150-61. PubMed ID: 20968385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Information-bearing acoustic change outperforms duration in predicting intelligibility of full-spectrum and noise-vocoded sentences.
    Stilp CE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):1518-29. PubMed ID: 24606287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Improvement of intelligibility of ideal binary-masked noisy speech by adding background noise.
    Cao S; Li L; Wu X
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Apr; 129(4):2227-36. PubMed ID: 21476677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The role of contrasting temporal amplitude patterns in the perception of speech.
    Healy EW; Warren RM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Mar; 113(3):1676-88. PubMed ID: 12656400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Aircraft noise and speech intelligibility in an outdoor living space.
    Alvarsson JJ; Nordström H; Lundén P; Nilsson ME
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jun; 135(6):3455-62. PubMed ID: 24907809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pitch and spectral resolution: A systematic comparison of bottom-up cues for top-down repair of degraded speech.
    Clarke J; Başkent D; Gaudrain E
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Jan; 139(1):395-405. PubMed ID: 26827034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Formant-frequency variation and its effects on across-formant grouping in speech perception.
    Roberts B; Summers RJ; Bailey PJ
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2013; 787():323-31. PubMed ID: 23716238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The contribution of obstruent consonants and acoustic landmarks to speech recognition in noise.
    Li N; Loizou PC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Dec; 124(6):3947. PubMed ID: 19206819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quantifying the intelligibility of speech in noise for non-native talkers.
    van Wijngaarden SJ; Steeneken HJ; Houtgast T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Dec; 112(6):3004-13. PubMed ID: 12509022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Preliminary evaluation of a formant enhancement algorithm on the perception of speech in noise for normally hearing listeners.
    Alcántara JI; Dooley GJ; Blamey PJ; Seligman PM
    Audiology; 1994; 33(1):15-27. PubMed ID: 8129677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Perceptual effects of noise reduction by time-frequency masking of noisy speech.
    Brons I; Houben R; Dreschler WA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2690-9. PubMed ID: 23039461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Critical bandwidth speech: Arrays of subcritical band speech maintain near-ceiling intelligibility at high amplitudes.
    Warren RM; Bashford JA; Lenz PW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Mar; 141(3):EL222. PubMed ID: 28372079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.