BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9056500)

  • 1. Hexavalent chromium-contaminated soils: options for risk assessment and risk management.
    Felter SP; Dourson ML
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1997 Feb; 25(1):43-59. PubMed ID: 9056500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessment of the human health risks posed by exposure to chromium-contaminated soils.
    Sheehan PJ; Meyer DM; Sauer MM; Paustenbach DJ
    J Toxicol Environ Health; 1991 Feb; 32(2):161-201. PubMed ID: 1995927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Human health risk and exposure assessment of chromium (VI) in tap water.
    Paustenbach DJ; Finley BL; Mowat FS; Kerger BD
    J Toxicol Environ Health A; 2003 Jul; 66(14):1295-339. PubMed ID: 12851114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Safety assessment of chromium by exposure from cosmetic products.
    Hwang M; Yoon EK; Kim JY; Son BK; Yang SJ; Yun MO; Choi SS; Jang DD; Yoo TM
    Arch Pharm Res; 2009 Feb; 32(2):235-41. PubMed ID: 19280154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Review of the allergic contact dermatitis hazard posed by chromium-contaminated soil: identifying a "safe" concentration.
    Paustenbach DJ; Sheehan PJ; Paull JM; Wisser LM; Finley BL
    J Toxicol Environ Health; 1992 Sep; 37(1):177-207. PubMed ID: 1522610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Risk assessment of the allergic dermatitis potential of environmental exposure to hexavalent chromium.
    Stern AH; Bagdon RE; Hazen RE; Marzulli FN
    J Toxicol Environ Health; 1993 Dec; 40(4):613-41. PubMed ID: 8277522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Determination of the bioaccessibility of chromium in Glasgow soil and the implications for human health risk assessment.
    Broadway A; Cave MR; Wragg J; Fordyce FM; Bewley RJ; Graham MC; Ngwenya BT; Farmer JG
    Sci Total Environ; 2010 Dec; 409(2):267-77. PubMed ID: 21035835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Review of the U.S. Army's health risk assessments for oral exposure to six chemical-warfare agents. Introduction.
    J Toxicol Environ Health A; 2000 Mar; 59(5-6):281-526. PubMed ID: 10742829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An assessment and quantitative uncertainty analysis of the health risks to workers exposed to chromium contaminated soils.
    Paustenbach DJ; Meyer DM; Sheehan PJ; Lau V
    Toxicol Ind Health; 1991 May; 7(3):159-96. PubMed ID: 1949057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Risk-based ecological soil quality criteria for the characterization of contaminated soils. Combination of chemical and biological tools.
    Fernández MD; Vega MM; Tarazona JV
    Sci Total Environ; 2006 Aug; 366(2-3):466-84. PubMed ID: 16574196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The value of metals bioavailability and speciation information for ecological risk assessment in arid soils.
    Suedel BC; Nicholson A; Day CH; Spicer J
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2006 Oct; 2(4):355-64. PubMed ID: 17069177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Using the EPC approach to develop health-based soil and water screening concentrations for environmental chemicals.
    Williams CA; James RC; Freeman RW
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1995 Aug; 22(1):64-75. PubMed ID: 7494905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluating the adequacy of maximum contaminant levels as health-protective cleanup goals: an analysis based on Monte Carlo techniques.
    Finley BL; Scott P; Paustenbach DJ
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1993 Dec; 18(3):438-55. PubMed ID: 8128005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Framework for metals risk assessment.
    Fairbrother A; Wenstel R; Sappington K; Wood W
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2007 Oct; 68(2):145-227. PubMed ID: 17889701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A lifestage-specific approach to hazard and dose-response characterization for children's health risk assessment.
    Makris SL; Thompson CM; Euling SY; Selevan SG; Sonawane B
    Birth Defects Res B Dev Reprod Toxicol; 2008 Dec; 83(6):530-46. PubMed ID: 19085945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Setting health-protective soil concentrations for dermal contact allergens: a proposed methodology.
    Horowitz SB; Finley BL
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1994 Feb; 19(1):31-47. PubMed ID: 8159813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The prevalence of chromium allergy in the United States and its implications for setting soil cleanup: a cost-effectiveness case study.
    Proctor DM; Fredrick MM; Scott PK; Paustenbach DJ; Finley BL
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1998 Aug; 28(1):27-37. PubMed ID: 9784430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Characterization of EPA's 16 priority pollutant polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in tank bottom solids and associated contaminated soils at oil exploration and production sites in Texas.
    Bojes HK; Pope PG
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2007 Apr; 47(3):288-95. PubMed ID: 17291653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ecological effects of diffuse mixed pollution are site-specific and require higher-tier risk assessment to improve site management decisions: a discussion paper.
    Leo P; Eijsackers HJ; Koelmans AA; Vijver MG
    Sci Total Environ; 2008 Dec; 406(3):503-17. PubMed ID: 18757078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's inhalation RfD methodology: risk assessment for air toxics.
    Jarabek AM; Menache MG; Overton JH; Dourson ML; Miller FJ
    Toxicol Ind Health; 1990 Oct; 6(5):279-301. PubMed ID: 1670284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.