These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9056597)

  • 1. Choice of student's t- or Wilcoxon-based confidence intervals for assessment of average bioequivalence.
    Hauck WW; Hauschke D; Diletti E; Bois FY; Steinijans VW; Anderson S
    J Biopharm Stat; 1997 Mar; 7(1):179-89. PubMed ID: 9056597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A distribution-free procedure for the statistical analysis of bioequivalence studies.
    Hauschke D; Steinijans VW; Diletti E
    Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol; 1992; 30 Suppl 1():S37-43. PubMed ID: 1601530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A distribution-free procedure for the statistical analysis of bioequivalence studies.
    Hauschke D; Steinijans VW; Diletti E
    Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol; 1990 Feb; 28(2):72-8. PubMed ID: 2307548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of gastric emptying and entero-hepatic circulation on bioequivalence assessment of ranitidine.
    Chrenova J; Durisova M; Mircioiu C; Dedik L
    Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol; 2010; 32(6):413-9. PubMed ID: 20852750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A semi-parametric Bayesian approach to average bioequivalence.
    Ghosh P; Rosner GL
    Stat Med; 2007 Mar; 26(6):1224-36. PubMed ID: 16832840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment of the bioequivalence of two formulations of clarithromycin extended-release 500-mg tablets under fasting and fed conditions: a single-dose, randomized, open-label, two-period, two-way crossover study in healthy Jordanian male volunteers.
    Alkhalidi BA; Tamimi JJ; Salem II; Ibrahim H; Sallam AA
    Clin Ther; 2008 Oct; 30(10):1831-43. PubMed ID: 19014838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Multiple testing for bioequivalence with pharmacokinetic data in 2 x 2 crossover designs.
    Chen YI; Huang CS
    Stat Med; 2009 Dec; 28(28):3567-79. PubMed ID: 19760611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bioequivalence of a single 10-mg dose of finasteride 5-mg oral disintegrating tablets and standard tablets in healthy adult male Han Chinese volunteers: a randomized sequence, open-label, two-way crossover study.
    Chen L; Jiang X; Huang L; Lan K; Wang H; Hu L; Ren J; Li X; Zou Q
    Clin Ther; 2009 Oct; 31(10):2242-8. PubMed ID: 19922895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Kullback-Leibler divergence for evaluating bioequivalence.
    Dragalin V; Fedorov V; Patterson S; Jones B
    Stat Med; 2003 Mar; 22(6):913-30. PubMed ID: 12627409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Update on the statistical analysis of bioequivalence studies.
    Steinijans VW; Hauschke D
    Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol; 1992; 30 Suppl 1():S45-50. PubMed ID: 1601531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A group sequential approach to crossover trials for average bioequivalence.
    Hauck WW; Preston PE; Bois FY
    J Biopharm Stat; 1997 Mar; 7(1):87-96. PubMed ID: 9056590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation by simulation of tests based on non-linear mixed-effects models in pharmacokinetic interaction and bioequivalence cross-over trials.
    Panhard X; Mentré F
    Stat Med; 2005 May; 24(10):1509-24. PubMed ID: 15761916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A new approach for outliers in a bioavailability/bioequivalence study.
    Liao JJ
    J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(3):393-405. PubMed ID: 17479389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An adjusted two one-sided t-test for the assessment of bioequivalence with multiple doses.
    Wang W; Hsuan F; Chow SC
    J Biopharm Stat; 1997 Mar; 7(1):157-70. PubMed ID: 9056595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Carry-over effects in bioequivalence studies.
    Dangelo G; Potvin D; Turgeon J
    J Biopharm Stat; 2001; 11(1-2):35-43. PubMed ID: 11459441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A single-dose, three-period, six-sequence crossover study comparing the bioavailability of solution, suspension, and enteric-coated tablets of magnesium valproate in healthy Mexican volunteers under fasting conditions.
    Marcelín-Jiménez G; Angeles-Moreno AP; Contreras-Zavala L; Morales-Martínez M; Rivera-Espinosa L
    Clin Ther; 2009 Sep; 31(9):2002-11. PubMed ID: 19843490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pharmacokinetic analysis of bioequivalence trials: implications for sex-related issues in clinical pharmacology and biopharmaceutics.
    Chen ML; Lee SC; Ng MJ; Schuirmann DJ; Lesko LJ; Williams RL
    Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2000 Nov; 68(5):510-21. PubMed ID: 11103754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A three-step procedure for assessing bioequivalence in the general mixed model framework.
    Vuorinen J; Turunen J
    Stat Med; 1996 Dec; 15(24):2635-55. PubMed ID: 8981677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Confidence intervals for ratios of AUCs in the case of serial sampling: a comparison of seven methods.
    Jaki T; Wolfsegger MJ; Ploner M
    Pharm Stat; 2009; 8(1):12-24. PubMed ID: 18407562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bioavailability and bioequivalence of two oral formulations of alendronate sodium 70 mg: an open-label, randomized, two-period crossover comparison in healthy Korean adult male volunteers.
    Rhim SY; Park JH; Park YS; Lee MH; Kim DS; Shaw LM; Yang SC; Kang JS
    Clin Ther; 2009 May; 31(5):1037-45. PubMed ID: 19539104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.