389 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9056743)
1. Comparison of five cell cycle analysis models applied to 1414 flow cytometric DNA histograms of fresh frozen breast cancer.
Bergers E; van Diest PJ; Baak JP
Cytometry; 1997 Feb; 30(1):54-60. PubMed ID: 9056743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reproducibility of semi-automated cell cycle analysis of flow cytometric DNA-histograms of fresh breast cancer material.
Bergers E; van Diest PJ; Baak JP
Anal Cell Pathol; 1995 Jan; 8(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 7734408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prognostic implications of different cell cycle analysis models of flow cytometric DNA histograms of 1,301 breast cancer patients: results from the Multicenter Morphometric Mammary Carcinoma Project (MMMCP).
Bergers E; Baak JP; van Diest PJ; van Gorp LH; Kwee WS; Los J; Peterse HL; Ruitenberg HM; Schapers RF; Somsen JG; van Beek MW; Bellot SM; Fijnheer J
Int J Cancer; 1997 Jun; 74(3):260-9. PubMed ID: 9221802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Different calculation methods for flow cytometric S-phase fraction: prognostic implications in breast cancer? The Swedish Society of Cancer Study Group.
Baldetorp B; Stål O; Ahrens O; Cornelisse C; Corver W; Falkmer U; Fernö M
Cytometry; 1998 Dec; 33(4):385-93. PubMed ID: 9845432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cell cycle analysis of 932 flow cytometric DNA histograms of fresh frozen breast carcinoma material. Correlations between flow cytometric, clinical, and pathologic variables. MMMCP Collaborative Group. Multicenter Morphometric Mammary Carcinoma Project Collaborative Group.
Bergers E; van Diest PJ; Baak JP
Cancer; 1996 Jun; 77(11):2258-66. PubMed ID: 8635093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Interlaboratory reproducibility of semiautomated cell cycle analysis of flow cytometry DNA-histograms obtained from fresh material of 1,295 breast cancer cases.
Bergers E; Montironi R; van Diest PJ; Prete E; Baak JP
Hum Pathol; 1996 Jun; 27(6):553-60. PubMed ID: 8666364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Flow cytometric DNA-analysis of cells obtained with fine needle aspiration biopsy of the breast.
Niezabitowski A; Lackowska B; Gruchala A; Ryś J; Jaszcz A; Szklarski W; Wasilewska A; Herman K
Gen Diagn Pathol; 1996 Jun; 142(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 8793484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of flow cytometric DNA content analysis of fresh and formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded solid neoplasms.
Kumar D; Kumar S; Lyon D
Mod Pathol; 1994 Apr; 7(3):354-60. PubMed ID: 8058708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of a modeling system for S-phase estimation in breast cancer by flow cytometry.
Dressler LG; Seamer L; Owens MA; Clark GM; McGuire WL
Cancer Res; 1987 Oct; 47(20):5294-302. PubMed ID: 3652035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reproducibility in DNA flow cytometric analysis of breast cancer: comparison of 12 laboratories' results for 67 sample homogenates.
Baldetorp B; Bendahl PO; Fernö M; Alanen K; Delle U; Falkmer U; Hansson-Aggesjö B; Höckenström T; Lindgren A; Mossberg L
Cytometry; 1995 Jun; 22(2):115-27. PubMed ID: 7587742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Automated peak detection and cell cycle analysis of flow cytometric DNA histograms.
Kallioniemi OP; Visakorpi T; Holli K; Isola JJ; Rabinovitch PS
Cytometry; 1994 Jul; 16(3):250-5. PubMed ID: 7924694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Statistical evaluation of cell kinetic data from DNA flow cytometry (FCM) by the EM algorithm.
Baldetorp B; Dalberg M; Holst U; Lindgren G
Cytometry; 1989 Nov; 10(6):695-705. PubMed ID: 2582959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Flow cytometric DNA analysis of breast cancer by two colour method using cytokeratin labeling for identification of tumour cells.
Kimmig R; Spelsberg H; Kapsner T; Untch M; Hepp H
Anal Cell Pathol; 1994 Oct; 7(3):205-15. PubMed ID: 7531483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of breast carcinoma chemosensitivity by flow cytometric DNA analysis and computer assisted image analysis.
Briffod M; Spyratos F; Hacène K; Tubiana-Hulin M; Pallud C; Gilles F; Rouëssé J
Cytometry; 1992; 13(3):250-8. PubMed ID: 1576891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells are a reliable internal standard for the flow cytometric DNA analysis of frozen malignant breast biopsies.
Benn DE; Robinson BG
Cytometry; 1996 Jun; 26(2):161-5. PubMed ID: 8817093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of flow and image cytometry for DNA content analysis of fresh and formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue in breast carcinoma.
Chen TL; Luo I; Mikhail N; Rasková J; Raska K
Cytometry; 1995 Sep; 22(3):181-9. PubMed ID: 8556949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Improved prognostic impact of S-phase values from paraffin-embedded breast and prostate carcinomas after correcting for nuclear slicing.
Kallioniemi OP; Visakorpi T; Holli K; Heikkinen A; Isola J; Koivula T
Cytometry; 1991; 12(5):413-21. PubMed ID: 1935457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Models of S-phase determination in lymphomas from flow cytometric DNA content histograms: comparison with the bromodeoxyuridine labeling index.
Beauregard P; Witzig TE; Kurtin PJ; Greipp PR; Stenson MJ; Katzmann JA; Habermann TM; Wieand HS
Hematol Pathol; 1991; 5(4):177-83. PubMed ID: 1794967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. DNA flow cytometry on breast carcinomas: comparison of a detergent and an enzyme-detergent preparation method.
Risberg B; Stål O; Eriksson LL; Hussein A
Anal Cell Pathol; 1990 Sep; 2(5):287-95. PubMed ID: 2275875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A DNA cytometric proliferation index improves the value of the DNA ploidy pattern as a prognosticating tool in patients with carcinoma of the prostate.
Ahlgren G; Lindholm K; Falkmer U; Abrahamsson PA
Urology; 1997 Sep; 50(3):379-84. PubMed ID: 9301701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
