182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9057584)
1. Nuclear medicine techniques provide unique physiologic characterization of suspected and known soft tissue and bone sarcomas.
Hicks RJ
Acta Orthop Scand Suppl; 1997 Feb; 273():25-36. PubMed ID: 9057584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using
Pianou NK; Stavrou PZ; Vlontzou E; Rondogianni P; Exarhos DN; Datseris IE
Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 30843003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Positron emission tomography of soft tissue sarcomas.
Israel-Mardirosian N; Adler LP
Curr Opin Oncol; 2003 Jul; 15(4):327-30. PubMed ID: 12874512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Functional imaging techniques for evaluation of sarcomas.
Hicks RJ
Cancer Imaging; 2005 Jun; 5(1):58-65. PubMed ID: 16154821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The value of FDG-PET in the detection, grading and response to therapy of soft tissue and bone sarcomas; a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Bastiaannet E; Groen H; Jager PL; Cobben DC; van der Graaf WT; Vaalburg W; Hoekstra HJ
Cancer Treat Rev; 2004 Feb; 30(1):83-101. PubMed ID: 14766127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. F-18 FDG-PET for detection of osseous metastatic disease and staging, restaging, and monitoring response to therapy of musculoskeletal tumors.
Peterson JJ
Semin Musculoskelet Radiol; 2007 Sep; 11(3):246-60. PubMed ID: 18260035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Value of FDG PET/CT in Patient Management and Outcome of Skeletal and Soft Tissue Sarcomas.
Sheikhbahaei S; Marcus C; Hafezi-Nejad N; Taghipour M; Subramaniam RM
PET Clin; 2015 Jul; 10(3):375-93. PubMed ID: 26099673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical value of [18-F]] fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography imaging in soft tissue sarcomas.
Schwarzbach MH; Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A; Willeke F; Hinz U; Strauss LG; Zhang YM; Mechtersheimer G; Attigah N; Lehnert T; Herfarth C
Ann Surg; 2000 Mar; 231(3):380-6. PubMed ID: 10714631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Contemporary imaging in sarcoma.
Landa J; Schwartz LH
Oncologist; 2009 Oct; 14(10):1021-38. PubMed ID: 19789392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The role of plain radiography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging in sarcoma evaluation.
Massengill AD; Seeger LL; Eckardt JJ
Hematol Oncol Clin North Am; 1995 Jun; 9(3):571-604. PubMed ID: 7649943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. FDG-PET for evaluating musculoskeletal tumors: a review.
Aoki J; Endo K; Watanabe H; Shinozaki T; Yanagawa T; Ahmed AR; Takagishi K
J Orthop Sci; 2003; 8(3):435-41. PubMed ID: 12768492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Imaging of soft-tissue sarcomas.
Varma DG
Curr Oncol Rep; 2000 Nov; 2(6):487-90. PubMed ID: 11122882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Imaging of Bone Sarcomas and Soft-Tissue Sarcomas.
Igrec J; Fuchsjäger MH
Rofo; 2021 Oct; 193(10):1171-1182. PubMed ID: 33772487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dual-time point 18FDG-PET/CT imaging may be useful in assessing local recurrent disease in high grade bone and soft tissue sarcoma.
Dancheva Z; Bochev P; Chaushev B; Yordanova T; Klisarova A
Nucl Med Rev Cent East Eur; 2016; 19(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 26841376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Role of repeated F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose imaging in management of patients with bone and soft tissue sarcoma.
el-Zeftawy H; Heiba SI; Jana S; Rosen G; Salem S; Santiago JF; Abdel-Dayem HM
Cancer Biother Radiopharm; 2001 Feb; 16(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 11279796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Imaging bone and soft tissue tumors with the proliferation marker [18F]fluorodeoxythymidine.
Buck AK; Herrmann K; Büschenfelde CM; Juweid ME; Bischoff M; Glatting G; Weirich G; Möller P; Wester HJ; Scheidhauer K; Dechow T; Peschel C; Schwaiger M; Reske SN
Clin Cancer Res; 2008 May; 14(10):2970-7. PubMed ID: 18445694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Monitoring bone and soft-tissue tumors after carbon-ion radiotherapy using ¹⁸F-FDG positron emission tomography: a retrospective cohort study.
Yanagawa T; Saito K; Kiyohara H; Ohno T; Nakano T; Takagishi K
Radiat Oncol; 2015 Dec; 10():259. PubMed ID: 26691334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. 18FDG PET scanning of benign and malignant musculoskeletal lesions.
Feldman F; van Heertum R; Manos C
Skeletal Radiol; 2003 Apr; 32(4):201-8. PubMed ID: 12652335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. FDG PET/MR in initial staging of sarcoma: Initial experience and comparison with conventional imaging.
Platzek I; Beuthien-Baumann B; Schramm G; Maus J; Laniado M; Kotzerke J; van den Hoff J; Schuler M
Clin Imaging; 2017; 42():126-132. PubMed ID: 27951459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. PET/Computed Tomography and Precision Medicine: Musculoskeletal Sarcoma.
Kandathil A; Subramaniam RM
PET Clin; 2017 Oct; 12(4):475-488. PubMed ID: 28867117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
