These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9058034)

  • 1. A digital filterbank hearing aid: predicting user preference and performance for two signal processing algorithms.
    Lunner T; Hellgren J; Arlinger S; Elberling C
    Ear Hear; 1997 Feb; 18(1):12-25. PubMed ID: 9058034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A digital filterbank hearing aid: three digital signal processing algorithms--user preference and performance.
    Lunner T; Hellgren J; Arlinger S; Elberling C
    Ear Hear; 1997 Oct; 18(5):373-87. PubMed ID: 9360861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Non-linear signal processing in digital hearing aids.
    Lunner T; Hellgren J; Arlinger S; Elberling C
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1998; 49():40-9. PubMed ID: 10209776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Is normal or less than normal overall loudness preferred by first-time hearing aid users?
    Smeds K
    Ear Hear; 2004 Apr; 25(2):159-72. PubMed ID: 15064661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Do hearing loss and cognitive function modulate benefit from different binaural noise-reduction settings?
    Neher T; Grimm G; Hohmann V; Kollmeier B
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(3):e52-62. PubMed ID: 24351610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A digital filterbank hearing aid. Improving a prescriptive fitting with subjective adjustments.
    Lunner T; Hellgren J; Arlinger S; Elberling C
    Scand Audiol; 1997; 26(3):169-76. PubMed ID: 9309812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of multi-channel compression time constants on subjectively perceived sound quality and speech intelligibility.
    Hansen M
    Ear Hear; 2002 Aug; 23(4):369-80. PubMed ID: 12195179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Investigation of Extended Bandwidth Hearing Aid Amplification on Speech Intelligibility and Sound Quality in Adults with Mild-to-Moderate Hearing Loss.
    Seeto A; Searchfield GD
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Mar; 29(3):243-254. PubMed ID: 29488874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Tolerable hearing aid delays. V. Estimation of limits for open canal fittings.
    Stone MA; Moore BC; Meisenbacher K; Derleth RP
    Ear Hear; 2008 Aug; 29(4):601-17. PubMed ID: 18469715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparing loudness normalization (IHAFF) with speech intelligibility maximization (NAL-NL1) when implemented in a two-channel device.
    Keidser G; Grant F
    Ear Hear; 2001 Dec; 22(6):501-15. PubMed ID: 11770672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Linear and nonlinear hearing aid fittings--2. Patterns of candidature.
    Gatehouse S; Naylor G; Elberling C
    Int J Audiol; 2006 Mar; 45(3):153-71. PubMed ID: 16579491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical trial of a digital hearing aid.
    Arlinger S; Billermark E; Oberg M; Lunner T; Hellgren J
    Scand Audiol; 1998; 27(1):51-61. PubMed ID: 9505292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ear asymmetries and asymmetric directional microphone hearing aid fittings.
    Cord MT; Surr RK; Walden BE; Dittberner AB
    Am J Audiol; 2011 Dec; 20(2):111-22. PubMed ID: 21764997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Preferred listening levels for linear and slow-acting compression hearing aids.
    Neuman AC; Bakke MH; Hellman S; Levitt H
    Ear Hear; 1995 Aug; 16(4):407-16. PubMed ID: 8549896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of a dual-channel full dynamic range compression system for people with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Moore BC; Johnson JS; Clark TM; Pluvinage V
    Ear Hear; 1992 Oct; 13(5):349-70. PubMed ID: 1487095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of threshold-based fitting strategies for nonlinear hearing aids.
    Stelmachowicz PG; Dalzell S; Peterson D; Kopun J; Lewis DL; Hoover BE
    Ear Hear; 1998 Apr; 19(2):131-8. PubMed ID: 9562535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Binaural model-based dynamic-range compression.
    Ernst SMA; Kortlang S; Grimm G; Bisitz T; Kollmeier B; Ewert SD
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S31-S42. PubMed ID: 29373937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Listener Performance with a Novel Hearing Aid Frequency Lowering Technique.
    Kirby BJ; Kopun JG; Spratford M; Mollak CM; Brennan MA; McCreery RW
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 Oct; 28(9):810-822. PubMed ID: 28972470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Client preferences for compression threshold in single-channel wide dynamic range compression hearing aids.
    Barker C; Dillon H
    Ear Hear; 1999 Apr; 20(2):127-39. PubMed ID: 10229514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Tolerable hearing aid delays. I. Estimation of limits imposed by the auditory path alone using simulated hearing losses.
    Stone MA; Moore BC
    Ear Hear; 1999 Jun; 20(3):182-92. PubMed ID: 10386846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.