These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

54 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9060210)

  • 1. The effects of air cavities on X-ray dose distribution at 6 and 25 MV.
    Wong TP; Kan WK; Law M
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 1996 Dec; 19(4):237-47. PubMed ID: 9060210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of two photon planning algorithms for 8 MV and 25 MV X-ray beams in lung.
    Kan MW; Wong TP; Young EC; Chan CL; Yu PK
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 1995 Jun; 18(2):95-103. PubMed ID: 7669028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Investigation of photon beam models in heterogeneous media of modern radiotherapy.
    Ding W; Johnston PN; Wong TP; Bubb IF
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2004 Jun; 27(2):39-48. PubMed ID: 15462585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Radiotherapy x-ray dose distribution beyond air cavities.
    Wong TP; Metcalfe PE; Kron T; Emeleus TG
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 1992 Sep; 15(3):138-46. PubMed ID: 1471964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The influence of air cavities on interface doses for photon beams.
    Klein EE; Chin LM; Rice RK; Mijnheer BJ
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1993 Sep; 27(2):419-27. PubMed ID: 8407418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Air cavity effects on the radiation dose to the larynx using Co-60, 6 MV, and 10 MV photon beams.
    Niroomand-Rad A; Harter KW; Thobejane S; Bertrand K
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1994 Jul; 29(5):1139-46. PubMed ID: 8083084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluating the effectiveness of a longitudinal magnetic field in reducing underdosing of the regions around upper respiratory cavities irradiated with photon beams--a Monte Carlo study.
    Wadi-Ramahi SJ; Naqvi SA; Chu JC
    Med Phys; 2001 Aug; 28(8):1711-7. PubMed ID: 11548941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Correction method for the physical dose calculated using Clarkson integration at the center of the spread-out Bragg peak for asymmetric field in carbon-ion radiotherapy.
    Tajiri M; Maeda T; Isobe Y; Tanimoto K; Shibayama K
    Phys Med; 2014 Dec; 30(8):985-8. PubMed ID: 25085450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Does 4 MV perform better compared to 6 MV in the presence of air cavities in the head and neck region?
    Petoukhova AL; Terhaard CH; Welleweerd H
    Radiother Oncol; 2006 May; 79(2):203-7. PubMed ID: 16698100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Superficial dose distribution in breast for tangential radiation treatment, Monte Carlo evaluation of Eclipse algorithms in case of phantom and patient geometries.
    Chakarova R; Gustafsson M; Bäck A; Drugge N; Palm Å; Lindberg A; Berglund M
    Radiother Oncol; 2012 Jan; 102(1):102-7. PubMed ID: 21741719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [A mathematical description of the relative dosage distributions of stereotactic collimator tubes in 6-MV photon radiation].
    Müller J; Leetz HK; Vogelgesang U
    Strahlenther Onkol; 1993 Nov; 169(11):668-71. PubMed ID: 8248843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of air-cavity inhomogeneity effects for cobalt-60, 6-, and 10-MV x-ray beams.
    Beach JL; Mendiondo MS; Mendiondo OA
    Med Phys; 1987; 14(1):140-4. PubMed ID: 3104739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A novel method for patient exit and entrance dose prediction based on water equivalent path length measured with an amorphous silicon electronic portal imaging device.
    Kavuma A; Glegg M; Metwaly M; Currie G; Elliott A
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Jan; 55(2):435-52. PubMed ID: 20019398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison between direct TMR measurements and TMRs calculated from PDDs using BJR Supplement 25 data for flattened and unflattened photon beams.
    Sutherland B; Middlebrook N; Kairn T; Hill B
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2015 Sep; 38(3):503-7. PubMed ID: 26123946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of air cavities on central depth dose curves for 33 MV roentgen rays.
    Samuelsson C
    Acta Radiol Ther Phys Biol; 1977 Dec; 16(6):465-88. PubMed ID: 415520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Method for estimating 4 MV X-ray irregular field dose using the collimator scatter factor (Sc) and phantom scatter factor (Sp)].
    Nara T; Iwasaki A; Komai F; Sato K; Fukushi H; Horanai Y
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2004 Nov; 60(11):1592-603. PubMed ID: 15568012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dose build-up behind air cavities for Co-60, 4, 6 and 8 MV. Measurements and Monte Carlo simulations.
    Behrens CF
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Nov; 51(22):5937-50. PubMed ID: 17068375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Surface dose measurements with GafChromic EBT film for 6 and 18MV photon beams.
    Bilge H; Cakir A; Okutan M; Acar H
    Phys Med; 2009 Jun; 25(2):101-4. PubMed ID: 18571964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Skin dose measurements using radiochromic films, TLDS and ionisation chamber and comparison with Monte Carlo simulation.
    Alashrah S; Kandaiya S; Maalej N; El-Taher A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2014 Dec; 162(3):338-44. PubMed ID: 24300340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Entrance dose measurement: a simple and reliable technique.
    Banjade DP; Raj TA; Ng BS; Xavier S; Tajuddin AA; Shukri A
    Med Dosim; 2003; 28(2):73-8. PubMed ID: 12804703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.