These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9060955)
1. The mammography consensus jury speaks out. Nelson NJ J Natl Cancer Inst; 1997 Mar; 89(5):344-7. PubMed ID: 9060955 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. American and European recommendations for screening mammography in younger women: a cultural divide? Jatoi I; Baum M BMJ; 1993 Dec; 307(6917):1481-3. PubMed ID: 8281094 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mammography screening: are women really giving informed consent? (Counterpoint). Berg AO J Natl Cancer Inst; 2003 Oct; 95(20):1511-2; discussion 1512-3. PubMed ID: 14559871 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Lessons from the Swiss Medical Board recommendation against mammography screening programs. Chiolero A; Rodondi N JAMA Intern Med; 2014 Oct; 174(10):1541-2. PubMed ID: 25154463 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Screening mammography in women 40 to 49 years of age. Lisby MD Am Fam Physician; 2004 Nov; 70(9):1750-2. PubMed ID: 15554494 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Increased benefit from shorter screening mammography intervals for women ages 40-49 years. Feig SA Cancer; 1997 Dec; 80(11):2035-9. PubMed ID: 9392324 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Mammography screening: are women really giving informed consent? Baines CJ J Natl Cancer Inst; 2003 Oct; 95(20):1508-11. PubMed ID: 14559870 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Mammography screening: are women really giving informed consent? (Countering the counterpoint). Baines CJ J Natl Cancer Inst; 2003 Oct; 95(20):1512-3. PubMed ID: 14559872 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Mammography in 40-year-old patients: towards a definitive clarification]. Di Maggio C; Giuseppetti GM; Gozzi G; Majorana M; Vella A; Amici F Radiol Med; 1994 Jun; 87(6):731-5. PubMed ID: 8041922 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Evidence of efficacy of mammographic screening for women in their forties. Dupont WD Cancer; 1994 Aug; 74(4):1204-6. PubMed ID: 8055438 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The breast-screening brawl. Taubes G Science; 1997 Feb; 275(5303):1056-9. PubMed ID: 9054004 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Public health. Brawling over mammography. Marshall E Science; 2010 Feb; 327(5968):936-8. PubMed ID: 20167758 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The role of mammography screening. Conard FU; Mukherji B Conn Med; 1984 Mar; 48(3):203-4. PubMed ID: 6723295 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The benefits and harms of mammography screening: understanding the trade-offs. Woloshin S; Schwartz LM JAMA; 2010 Jan; 303(2):164-5. PubMed ID: 20068211 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. European Society of Mastology Consensus Conference on Breast Cancer screening, Paris, 4-5 February 1993: report of the Evaluation Committee. Wald NJ; Chamberlain J; Hackshaw A Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol); 1994; 6(4):261-8. PubMed ID: 7986765 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The controversy of mammography screening. Kopans DB Adm Radiol; 1995 Jan; 14(1):13-24. PubMed ID: 10141106 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Mammography screening for breast cancer. Reply to the commentaries. Kopans DB; Halpern E; Hulka CA Cancer; 1994 Aug; 74(4):1212-6. PubMed ID: 8055440 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The mammogram war. Begley S Newsweek; 1997 Feb; 129(8):54-8. PubMed ID: 10164990 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. European Society of Mastology Consensus Conference on breast cancer screening: report of the evaluation committee. Wald NJ; Chamberlain J; Hackshaw A Br J Radiol; 1994 Oct; 67(802):925-33. PubMed ID: 8000833 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]