BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9061087)

  • 1. Proper receiver operating characteristic analysis: the bigamma model.
    Dorfman DD; Berbaum KS; Metz CE; Lenth RV; Hanley JA; Abu Dagga H
    Acad Radiol; 1997 Feb; 4(2):138-49. PubMed ID: 9061087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A bivariate contaminated binormal model for robust fitting of proper ROC curves to a pair of correlated, possibly degenerate, ROC datasets.
    Zhai X; Chakraborty DP
    Med Phys; 2017 Jun; 44(6):2207-2222. PubMed ID: 28382718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The "proper" binormal model: parametric receiver operating characteristic curve estimation with degenerate data.
    Pan X; Metz CE
    Acad Radiol; 1997 May; 4(5):380-9. PubMed ID: 9156236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A contaminated binormal model for ROC data: Part III. Initial evaluation with detection ROC data.
    Dorfman DD; Berbaum KS
    Acad Radiol; 2000 Jun; 7(6):438-47. PubMed ID: 10845403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Degeneracy and discrete receiver operating characteristic rating data.
    Dorfman DD; Berbaum KS
    Acad Radiol; 1995 Oct; 2(10):907-15. PubMed ID: 9419659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Estimating the Area Under ROC Curve When the Fitted Binormal Curves Demonstrate Improper Shape.
    Bandos AI; Guo B; Gur D
    Acad Radiol; 2017 Feb; 24(2):209-219. PubMed ID: 27884464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Equivalence of binormal likelihood-ratio and bi-chi-squared ROC curve models.
    Hillis SL
    Stat Med; 2016 May; 35(12):2031-57. PubMed ID: 26608405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Constructing "proper" ROCs from ordinal response data using weighted power functions.
    Mossman D; Peng H
    Med Decis Making; 2014 May; 34(4):523-35. PubMed ID: 24029820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A contaminated binormal model for ROC data: Part II. A formal model.
    Dorfman DD; Berbaum KS
    Acad Radiol; 2000 Jun; 7(6):427-37. PubMed ID: 10845402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Using the mean-to-sigma ratio as a measure of the improperness of binormal ROC curves.
    Hillis SL; Berbaum KS
    Acad Radiol; 2011 Feb; 18(2):143-54. PubMed ID: 21232682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Proper ROC analysis and joint ROC analysis of the satisfaction of search effect in chest radiology.
    Berbaum KS; Dorfman DD; Franken EA; Caldwell RT
    Acad Radiol; 2000 Nov; 7(11):945-58. PubMed ID: 11089697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. "Proper" Binormal ROC Curves: Theory and Maximum-Likelihood Estimation.
    Metz CE; Pan X
    J Math Psychol; 1999 Mar; 43(1):1-33. PubMed ID: 10069933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A contaminated binormal model for ROC data: Part I. Some interesting examples of binormal degeneracy.
    Dorfman DD; Berbaum KS; Brandser EA
    Acad Radiol; 2000 Jun; 7(6):420-6. PubMed ID: 10845401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of parametric and nonparametric approaches to ROC analysis of quantitative diagnostic tests.
    Hajian-Tilaki KO; Hanley JA; Joseph L; Collet JP
    Med Decis Making; 1997; 17(1):94-102. PubMed ID: 8994156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Youden Index in the Generalized Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve Context.
    Martínez-Camblor P; Pardo-Fernández JC
    Int J Biostat; 2019 Apr; 15(1):. PubMed ID: 30943172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Smooth non-parametric receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for continuous diagnostic tests.
    Zou KH; Hall WJ; Shapiro DE
    Stat Med; 1997 Oct; 16(19):2143-56. PubMed ID: 9330425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The use of the 'binormal' model for parametric ROC analysis of quantitative diagnostic tests.
    Hanley JA
    Stat Med; 1996 Jul; 15(14):1575-85. PubMed ID: 8855483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Resampling techniques in the analysis of non-binormal ROC data.
    Mossman D
    Med Decis Making; 1995; 15(4):358-66. PubMed ID: 8544679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sample size determination for diagnostic accuracy studies involving binormal ROC curve indices.
    Obuchowski NA; McClish DK
    Stat Med; 1997 Jul; 16(13):1529-42. PubMed ID: 9249923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Using Dual Beta Distributions to Create "Proper" ROC Curves Based on Rating Category Data.
    Mossman D; Peng H
    Med Decis Making; 2016 Apr; 36(3):349-65. PubMed ID: 25911601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.