140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9061326)
1. Validity of colposcopy to identify and grade squamous intraepithelial lesions among Venezuelan women.
Tremont-Lukats IW; Teixeira GM; Vásquez J; Hernández D
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 1997; 18(1):57-60. PubMed ID: 9061326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Appraisal of the modalities used to evaluate an initial abnormal Papanicolaou smear.
Higgins RV; Hall JB; McGee JA; Laurent S; Alvarez RD; Partridge EE
Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Aug; 84(2):174-8. PubMed ID: 8041525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of the reliability of repeat cervical smears and colposcopy in patients with abnormal cervical cytology.
Mayeaux EJ; Harper MB; Abreo F; Pope JB; Phillips GS
J Fam Pract; 1995 Jan; 40(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 7807039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. MiRNA detection in cervical exfoliated cells for missed high-grade lesions in women with LSIL/CIN1 diagnosis after colposcopy-guided biopsy.
Ye J; Cheng XD; Cheng B; Cheng YF; Chen XJ; Lu WG
BMC Cancer; 2019 Jan; 19(1):112. PubMed ID: 30700264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Is human papillomavirus testing an effective triage method for detection of high-grade (grade 2 or 3) cervical intraepithelial neoplasia?
Adam E; Kaufman RH; Berkova Z; Icenogle J; Reeves WC
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Jun; 178(6):1235-44. PubMed ID: 9662307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Colposcopy for the diagnosis of squamous intraepithelial lesions: a meta-analysis.
Mitchell MF; Schottenfeld D; Tortolero-Luna G; Cantor SB; Richards-Kortum R
Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Apr; 91(4):626-31. PubMed ID: 9540955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Small lesion size measured by colposcopy may predict absence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in a large loop excision of the transformation zone specimen.
Munmany M; Marimon L; Cardona M; Nonell R; Juiz M; Astudillo R; Ordi J; Torné A; Del Pino M
BJOG; 2017 Feb; 124(3):495-502. PubMed ID: 27506510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnostic value of cytology and colposcopy for squamous and glandular cervical intraepithelial lesions.
Pajtler M; Audy-Jurković S; Ovanin-Rakić A; Makarović Z; Milojković M; Ljubojević N
Coll Antropol; 2003 Jun; 27(1):239-46. PubMed ID: 12974152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of atypical and low-grade cervical cytology in private practice.
Nyirjesy I; Billingsley FS; Forman MR
Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Oct; 92(4 Pt 1):601-7. PubMed ID: 9764636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Correlation of Swede score colposcopy scoring system and histopathological results in patients with high-risk HPV infection other than HPV16 and 18.
Alan M; Gunyeli I; Gultekin M; Sancı M; Yuce K
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Jan; 30(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 31792083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Discrepancy between colposcopy, punch biopsy and final histology of cone specimen: a prospective study.
Petousis S; Christidis P; Margioula-Siarkou C; Sparangis N; Athanasiadis A; Kalogiannidis I
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2018 May; 297(5):1271-1275. PubMed ID: 29442140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Human papilloma virus testing in patient follow-up post cone biopsy due to high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Almog B; Gamzu R; Kuperminc MJ; Levin I; Fainaru O; Niv J; Bar-Am A
Gynecol Oncol; 2003 Mar; 88(3):345-50. PubMed ID: 12648585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Repeat cervical cytology at the time of colposcopy. Is there an added benefit?
Simsir A; Ioffe OB; Bourquin P; Brooks SE; Henry M
Acta Cytol; 2001; 45(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 11213500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The borderline cervical smear: colposcopic and biopsy outcome.
al-Nafussi A; Rebello G; al-Yusif R; McGoogan E
J Clin Pathol; 2000 Jun; 53(6):439-44. PubMed ID: 10911801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Postcolposcopy management strategies for women referred with low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions or human papillomavirus DNA-positive atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance: a two-year prospective study.
Guido R; Schiffman M; Solomon D; Burke L;
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Jun; 188(6):1401-5. PubMed ID: 12824969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Human papillomavirus testing as triage for atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions: sensitivity, specificity, and cost-effectiveness.
Kaufman RH; Adam E; Icenogle J; Reeves WC
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Oct; 177(4):930-6. PubMed ID: 9369847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. High prevalence of high grade squamous intraepithelial lesions and microinvasive carcinoma in women with a cytologic diagnosis of low grade squamous intraepithelial lesions.
Law KS; Chang TC; Hsueh S; Jung SM; Tseng CJ; Lai CH
J Reprod Med; 2001 Jan; 46(1):61-4. PubMed ID: 11209634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Human papillomavirus deoxyribonucleic acid detection in mildly or moderately dysplastic smears: a possible method for selecting patients for colposcopy.
Bollen LJ; Tjong-A-Hung SP; van der Velden J; Brouwer K; Mol BW; ten Kate FJ; ter Schegget J
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Sep; 177(3):548-53. PubMed ID: 9322622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prospective follow-up suggests similar risk of subsequent cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or 3 among women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1 or negative colposcopy and directed biopsy.
Cox JT; Schiffman M; Solomon D;
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Jun; 188(6):1406-12. PubMed ID: 12824970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparing cytology, colposcopy and human papillomavirus cervical intraepithelial lesion screening methods in women with systemic lupus erythematosus.
García-Carrasco M; Mendoza-Pinto C; Méndez-Martínez S; Rodríguez-Reyes A; Munguía-Realpozo P; Taboada-Cole A; Vallejo-Ruiz V; Etchegaray-Morales I; Jiménez-Herrera R; Juárez-Melchor D; Villanueva-López I
Lupus; 2020 Aug; 29(9):1060-1066. PubMed ID: 32501171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]