216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9061532)
21. Use and satisfaction with prosthetic limb devices and related services.
Pezzin LE; Dillingham TR; Mackenzie EJ; Ephraim P; Rossbach P
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2004 May; 85(5):723-9. PubMed ID: 15129395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Evaluating a written emotional disclosure homework intervention for lower-limb amputees.
Gallagher P; Maclachlan M
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2002 Oct; 83(10):1464-6. PubMed ID: 12370888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Upper- and lower-limb amputees show reduced levels of eeriness for images of prosthetic hands.
Buckingham G; Parr J; Wood G; Day S; Chadwell A; Head J; Galpin A; Kenney L; Kyberd P; Gowen E; Poliakoff E
Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Aug; 26(4):1295-1302. PubMed ID: 31183744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Traumatic amputation of the upper limb: the use of body-powered prostheses and employment consequences.
Stürup J; Thyregod HC; Jensen JS; Retpen JB; Boberg G; Rasmussen E; Jensen S
Prosthet Orthot Int; 1988 Apr; 12(1):50-2. PubMed ID: 3399370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A comparison of the University of New Brunswick Test of Prosthetic Function and the Assessment of Capacity for Myoelectric Control.
Burger H; Brezovar D; Vidmar G
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2014 Aug; 50(4):433-8. PubMed ID: 24476807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Using the common sense self-regulation model to determine psychological predictors of prosthetic use and activity limitations in lower limb amputees.
Callaghan B; Condie E; Johnston M
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2008 Sep; 32(3):324-36. PubMed ID: 18825576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Pre prosthetic mobility: the amputees' perspectives.
Stokes D; Curzio J; Berry A; Bacon E; Morten M; Barker L
Disabil Rehabil; 2009; 31(2):138-43. PubMed ID: 18720111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The impact of using an upper-limb prosthesis on the perception of real and illusory weight differences.
Buckingham G; Parr J; Wood G; Vine S; Dimitriou P; Day S
Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Aug; 25(4):1507-1516. PubMed ID: 29352411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Function and Quality of Life of Unilateral Major Upper Limb Amputees: Effect of Prosthesis Use and Type.
Resnik L; Borgia M; Clark M
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2020 Aug; 101(8):1396-1406. PubMed ID: 32437692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Prosthesis rejection in acquired major upper-limb amputees: a population-based survey.
Østlie K; Lesjø IM; Franklin RJ; Garfelt B; Skjeldal OH; Magnus P
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2012 Jul; 7(4):294-303. PubMed ID: 22112174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Mobility, prosthesis use and health-related quality of life of bilateral lower limb amputees from the 2008 Sichuan earthquake.
Li WS; Chan SY; Chau WW; Law SW; Chan KM
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2019 Feb; 43(1):104-111. PubMed ID: 30112979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Job adjustments, job satisfaction and health experience in upper and lower limb amputees.
van der Sluis CK; Hartman PP; Schoppen T; Dijkstra PU
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2009 Mar; 33(1):41-51. PubMed ID: 19235065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Feminine identity and functional benefits are key factors in women's decision making about upper limb prostheses: a case series.
Resnik L; Klinger S; Gill A; Ekerholm Biester S
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2019 Feb; 14(2):194-208. PubMed ID: 29741966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Survey of upper limb prosthesis users in Sweden, the United Kingdom and Canada.
Kyberd PJ; Hill W
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2011 Jun; 35(2):234-41. PubMed ID: 21697204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Functional status and prosthesis use in amputees, measured with the Prosthetic Profile of the Amputee (PPA) and the short version of the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP68).
Streppel KR; de Vries J; van Harten WH
Int J Rehabil Res; 2001 Sep; 24(3):251-6. PubMed ID: 11560243
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Prosthetic usage in major upper extremity amputations.
Wright TW; Hagen AD; Wood MB
J Hand Surg Am; 1995 Jul; 20(4):619-22. PubMed ID: 7594289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Prosthesis satisfaction in a national sample of Veterans with upper limb amputation.
Resnik L; Borgia M; Heinemann AW; Clark MA
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2020 Apr; 44(2):81-91. PubMed ID: 31960734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Prosthesis use in adult acquired major upper-limb amputees: patterns of wear, prosthetic skills and the actual use of prostheses in activities of daily life.
Østlie K; Lesjø IM; Franklin RJ; Garfelt B; Skjeldal OH; Magnus P
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2012 Nov; 7(6):479-93. PubMed ID: 22315926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Perceptual correlates of successful body-prosthesis interaction in lower limb amputees: psychometric characterisation and development of the Prosthesis Embodiment Scale.
Bekrater-Bodmann R
Sci Rep; 2020 Aug; 10(1):14203. PubMed ID: 32848166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Mobility Analysis of AmpuTees (MAAT I): Quality of life and satisfaction are strongly related to mobility for patients with a lower limb prosthesis.
Wurdeman SR; Stevens PM; Campbell JH
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2018 Oct; 42(5):498-503. PubMed ID: 28990467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
