128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9061919)
21. Atomic force microscopy of plant chromosomes.
Winfield M; McMaster TJ; Karp A; Miles MJ
Chromosome Res; 1995 Mar; 3(2):128-31. PubMed ID: 7749562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Treatments with saline solutions and DNase I have different effects on DNA content and distribution in human and in mouse chromosomes.
Bottone MG; Malgara R; Pellicciari C; Fuhrman Conti AM
Eur J Histochem; 1996; 40(2):101-8. PubMed ID: 8839703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [A rapid method for the combined staining of chromosomal nucleolus organizer regions with silver and the differential staining of chromosomes in the laboratory mouse].
Patkin EL; Kustova ME; Dyban AP
Tsitologiia; 1992; 34(5):122-5. PubMed ID: 1455548
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Traditional banding of chromosomes for cytogenetic analysis.
Bayani J; Squire JA
Curr Protoc Cell Biol; 2004 Sep; Chapter 22():Unit 22.3. PubMed ID: 18228454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Characterization of the karyotype of the tench (Tinca tinca L.) and analysis of its chromosomal heterochromatic regions by C-banding, Ag-staining, and restriction endonuclease banding.
Padilla JA; Fernández-García JL; Rabasco A; Martínez-Trancón M; Rodriguez de Ledesma I; Pérez-Regadera JJ
Cytogenet Cell Genet; 1993; 62(4):220-3. PubMed ID: 8382594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A structural basis for R- and T-banding: a scanning electron microscopy study.
Jack EM; Harrison CJ; Allen TD; Harris R
Chromosoma; 1986; 94(5):395-402. PubMed ID: 3829828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Scanning electron microscopy of Giemsa-stained chromosomes and surface-spread chromosomes.
Utsumi KR
Chromosoma; 1982; 86(5):683-702. PubMed ID: 7151543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The G-banding pattern of chromosomes in Ehrlich Lettŕe ascites tumor cells.
Evans WL; Welch DL
Can J Genet Cytol; 1977 Mar; 19(1):167-75. PubMed ID: 861829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Identifying different types of chromatin using Giemsa staining.
Stockert JC; Blázquez-Castro A; Horobin RW
Methods Mol Biol; 2014; 1094():25-38. PubMed ID: 24162977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Giemsa-band patterns of the tahr and chromosomal evolution of the tribe Caprini.
Bunch TD; Nadler CF
J Hered; 1980; 71(2):110-6. PubMed ID: 7391534
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Some factors affecting the action of restriction endonucleases on human metaphase chromosomes.
Mezzanotte R; Ferrucci L; Vanni R; Sumner AT
Exp Cell Res; 1985 Nov; 161(1):247-53. PubMed ID: 2414120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A modified Giemsa C-banding technique for Hordeum species.
Noda K; Kasha KJ
Stain Technol; 1978 May; 53(3):155-62. PubMed ID: 725964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Responses of mammalian metaphase chromosomes to endonuclease digestion.
Sahasrabuddhe CG; Pathak S; Hsu TC
Chromosoma; 1978 Dec; 69(3):331-8. PubMed ID: 743903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Electron microscopy of G-banded human mitotic chromosomes.
Xu X; Wu M
Chromosoma; 1983; 88(3):237-40. PubMed ID: 6628086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Atomic force microscopy for analyzing metaphase chromosomes: comparison of AFM images with fluorescence labeling images of banding patterns.
Hoshi O; Ushiki T
Methods Mol Biol; 2014; 1094():151-7. PubMed ID: 24162986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Chromosomal replication asynchrony of a human breast carcinoma cell line. I. studied by continuous BrdU incorporation and G-banding analysis.
Wang N; Trend B; Kaung HL; Wang T
Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 1982 Oct; 7(2):173-80. PubMed ID: 7172164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Effects of acetic acid-alcohol, trypsin, histone 1 and histone fragments on Giemsa staining patterns in chromosomes.
Barnett RI; Gray VA; MacKinnon EA
Histochemistry; 1980; 65(3):207-15. PubMed ID: 7372504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. High-resolution dynamic and morphological G-bandings (GBG and GTG): a comparative study.
Lemieux N; Drouin R; Richer CL
Hum Genet; 1990 Aug; 85(3):261-6. PubMed ID: 2394443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Different banding techniques for the study of bovine chromosomes.
Märki U; Osterhoff DR
J S Afr Vet Assoc; 1985 Jun; 56(2):81-3. PubMed ID: 4020818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Karyotyping of barley chromosomes by a new fluorescence banding technique combined with scanning probe microscopy.
Sugiyama S; Yoshino T; Hirose T; Ohtani T
Scanning; 2012; 34(3):186-90. PubMed ID: 22058025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
