These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9062137)
1. Is Adam worth more than Eve? The financial impact of gender bias in the federal reimbursement of gynecological procedures. Goff BA; Muntz HG; Cain JM Gynecol Oncol; 1997 Mar; 64(3):372-7. PubMed ID: 9062137 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of 1997 Medicare relative value units for gender-specific procedures: is Adam still worth more than Eve? Goff BA; Muntz HG; Cain JM Gynecol Oncol; 1997 Aug; 66(2):313-9. PubMed ID: 9264582 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of 2015 Medicare relative value units for gender-specific procedures: Gynecologic and gynecologic-oncologic versus urologic CPT coding. Has time healed gender-worth? Benoit MF; Ma JF; Upperman BA Gynecol Oncol; 2017 Feb; 144(2):336-342. PubMed ID: 28024653 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reimbursement for surgical procedures in gynecologic oncology. Monk BJ; Burger RA Curr Opin Oncol; 2001 Sep; 13(5):390-3. PubMed ID: 11555718 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Discrepancies Created by Surgeon Self-Reported Operative Time and the Effects on Procedural Relative Value Units and Reimbursement. Uppal S; Rice LW; Spencer RJ Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Aug; 138(2):182-188. PubMed ID: 34237766 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A real world analysis of payment per unit time in a Maryland Vascular Practice. Martin JD; Warble PB; Hupp JA; Mapes JE; Stanziale SF; Weiss LL; Schiller TB; Hanson LA J Vasc Surg; 2010 Oct; 52(4):1094-8; discussion 1098-9. PubMed ID: 20619578 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Underreimbursement of obstetric and gynecologic invasive services by the resource-based relative value scale. Cherouny P; Nadolski C Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Mar; 87(3):328-31. PubMed ID: 8598949 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Surviving the perfect storm: an RVU-based model to evaluate the continuing impact of MMA on the practice of oncology. Dunning DM; Paivanas TA J Natl Compr Canc Netw; 2006 Jan; 4(1):3-15. PubMed ID: 16403401 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Disparity in Medicare payments by gender and training track in female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery. Dubinskaya A; Jackson FI; Labrias PR; Riley B; Shepherd JP Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Nov; 225(5):566.e1-566.e5. PubMed ID: 34473964 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. How Is Physician Work Valued? Jacobs JP; Lahey SJ; Nichols FC; Levett JM; Johnston GG; Freeman RK; St Louis JD; Painter J; Yohe C; Wright CD; Kanter KR; Mayer JE; Naunheim KS; Rich JB; Bavaria JE; Ann Thorac Surg; 2017 Feb; 103(2):373-380. PubMed ID: 28109347 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Variation in state and federal reimbursement in the United States in the treatment of upper extremity fractures. Green CK; Scanaliato JP; Polmear MM; Narimissaei DS; Fitzpatrick KV; Parnes N; Dunn JC J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2021 Nov; 30(11):2543-2548. PubMed ID: 33930557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Trends of Medicare Reimbursement Rates for Gender-Affirming Surgery Procedures. Cordero JJ; Alaniz L; Kalavacherla S; Tholpady SS; Chu MW Ann Plast Surg; 2024 May; 92(5S Suppl 3):S366-S370. PubMed ID: 38689421 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Relative value units correlate with pediatric surgeons' operating time: when perceived myth becomes reality. Little DC; St Peter SD; Calkins CM; Shah SR; Murphy JP; Gatti JM; Gittes GK; Sharp RJ; Andrews WS; Holcomb GW; Ostlie DJ; Snyder CL J Pediatr Surg; 2006 Jan; 41(1):234-8; discussion 234-8. PubMed ID: 16410140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reimbursement for Female-Specific Compared With Male-Specific Procedures Over Time. Polan RM; Barber EL Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Dec; 138(6):878-883. PubMed ID: 34736273 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The value of your time: evaluation of effects of changes in medicare reimbursement rates on the practice of urology. Lotan Y; Cadeddu JA; Roehrborn CG; Stage KH J Urol; 2004 Nov; 172(5 Pt 1):1958-62. PubMed ID: 15540765 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Underrepresentation of pediatric operations in the relative value unit updating process. Massoumi RL; Childers CP; Lee SL J Pediatr Surg; 2021 Jun; 56(6):1101-1106. PubMed ID: 33743987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reductions in Reimbursement and Relative Value Units for Interventional Radiology Procedures: Trends from 2011 to 2021 Compared with Those for Other Physician Specialties. Lindquester WS; Hawkins CM; Dhangana R J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2022 Aug; 33(8):972-977. PubMed ID: 35487347 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ambulatory patient classifications and the regressive nature of Medicare reform: is the reduction in outpatient health care reimbursement worth the price? Borgelt BB; Stone C Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1999 Oct; 45(3):729-34. PubMed ID: 10524429 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Professional Reimbursement by Medicaid for Cochlear Implants and Related Services. Conduff JH; Coelho DH Otol Neurotol; 2017 Aug; 38(7):985-989. PubMed ID: 28570413 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Equity in Medicaid Reimbursement for Otolaryngologists. Conduff JH; Coelho DH Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2017 Dec; 157(6):1005-1012. PubMed ID: 28828915 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]