168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9062137)
1. Is Adam worth more than Eve? The financial impact of gender bias in the federal reimbursement of gynecological procedures.
Goff BA; Muntz HG; Cain JM
Gynecol Oncol; 1997 Mar; 64(3):372-7. PubMed ID: 9062137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of 1997 Medicare relative value units for gender-specific procedures: is Adam still worth more than Eve?
Goff BA; Muntz HG; Cain JM
Gynecol Oncol; 1997 Aug; 66(2):313-9. PubMed ID: 9264582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of 2015 Medicare relative value units for gender-specific procedures: Gynecologic and gynecologic-oncologic versus urologic CPT coding. Has time healed gender-worth?
Benoit MF; Ma JF; Upperman BA
Gynecol Oncol; 2017 Feb; 144(2):336-342. PubMed ID: 28024653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reimbursement for surgical procedures in gynecologic oncology.
Monk BJ; Burger RA
Curr Opin Oncol; 2001 Sep; 13(5):390-3. PubMed ID: 11555718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Discrepancies Created by Surgeon Self-Reported Operative Time and the Effects on Procedural Relative Value Units and Reimbursement.
Uppal S; Rice LW; Spencer RJ
Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Aug; 138(2):182-188. PubMed ID: 34237766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A real world analysis of payment per unit time in a Maryland Vascular Practice.
Martin JD; Warble PB; Hupp JA; Mapes JE; Stanziale SF; Weiss LL; Schiller TB; Hanson LA
J Vasc Surg; 2010 Oct; 52(4):1094-8; discussion 1098-9. PubMed ID: 20619578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Underreimbursement of obstetric and gynecologic invasive services by the resource-based relative value scale.
Cherouny P; Nadolski C
Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Mar; 87(3):328-31. PubMed ID: 8598949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Surviving the perfect storm: an RVU-based model to evaluate the continuing impact of MMA on the practice of oncology.
Dunning DM; Paivanas TA
J Natl Compr Canc Netw; 2006 Jan; 4(1):3-15. PubMed ID: 16403401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Disparity in Medicare payments by gender and training track in female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery.
Dubinskaya A; Jackson FI; Labrias PR; Riley B; Shepherd JP
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Nov; 225(5):566.e1-566.e5. PubMed ID: 34473964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. How Is Physician Work Valued?
Jacobs JP; Lahey SJ; Nichols FC; Levett JM; Johnston GG; Freeman RK; St Louis JD; Painter J; Yohe C; Wright CD; Kanter KR; Mayer JE; Naunheim KS; Rich JB; Bavaria JE;
Ann Thorac Surg; 2017 Feb; 103(2):373-380. PubMed ID: 28109347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Variation in state and federal reimbursement in the United States in the treatment of upper extremity fractures.
Green CK; Scanaliato JP; Polmear MM; Narimissaei DS; Fitzpatrick KV; Parnes N; Dunn JC
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2021 Nov; 30(11):2543-2548. PubMed ID: 33930557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Trends of Medicare Reimbursement Rates for Gender-Affirming Surgery Procedures.
Cordero JJ; Alaniz L; Kalavacherla S; Tholpady SS; Chu MW
Ann Plast Surg; 2024 May; 92(5S Suppl 3):S366-S370. PubMed ID: 38689421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Relative value units correlate with pediatric surgeons' operating time: when perceived myth becomes reality.
Little DC; St Peter SD; Calkins CM; Shah SR; Murphy JP; Gatti JM; Gittes GK; Sharp RJ; Andrews WS; Holcomb GW; Ostlie DJ; Snyder CL
J Pediatr Surg; 2006 Jan; 41(1):234-8; discussion 234-8. PubMed ID: 16410140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reimbursement for Female-Specific Compared With Male-Specific Procedures Over Time.
Polan RM; Barber EL
Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Dec; 138(6):878-883. PubMed ID: 34736273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The value of your time: evaluation of effects of changes in medicare reimbursement rates on the practice of urology.
Lotan Y; Cadeddu JA; Roehrborn CG; Stage KH
J Urol; 2004 Nov; 172(5 Pt 1):1958-62. PubMed ID: 15540765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Underrepresentation of pediatric operations in the relative value unit updating process.
Massoumi RL; Childers CP; Lee SL
J Pediatr Surg; 2021 Jun; 56(6):1101-1106. PubMed ID: 33743987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reductions in Reimbursement and Relative Value Units for Interventional Radiology Procedures: Trends from 2011 to 2021 Compared with Those for Other Physician Specialties.
Lindquester WS; Hawkins CM; Dhangana R
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2022 Aug; 33(8):972-977. PubMed ID: 35487347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ambulatory patient classifications and the regressive nature of Medicare reform: is the reduction in outpatient health care reimbursement worth the price?
Borgelt BB; Stone C
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1999 Oct; 45(3):729-34. PubMed ID: 10524429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Professional Reimbursement by Medicaid for Cochlear Implants and Related Services.
Conduff JH; Coelho DH
Otol Neurotol; 2017 Aug; 38(7):985-989. PubMed ID: 28570413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Equity in Medicaid Reimbursement for Otolaryngologists.
Conduff JH; Coelho DH
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2017 Dec; 157(6):1005-1012. PubMed ID: 28828915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
