These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9063106)

  • 21. Three-body wear of resin denture teeth with and without nanofillers.
    Stober T; Henninger M; Schmitter M; Pritsch M; Rammelsberg P
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Feb; 103(2):108-17. PubMed ID: 20141815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. In vitro wear of indirect composite restoratives.
    Suzuki S; Nagai E; Taira Y; Minesaki Y
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Oct; 88(4):431-6. PubMed ID: 12447221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Marginal and internal adaptation of bulk-filled Class I and Cuspal coverage direct resin composite restorations.
    Stavridakis MM; Kakaboura AI; Ardu S; Krejci I
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(5):515-23. PubMed ID: 17910230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Cumulative effects of successive restorative procedures on anterior crown flexure: intact versus veneered incisors.
    Magne P; Douglas WH
    Quintessence Int; 2000 Jan; 31(1):5-18. PubMed ID: 11203907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Three-year randomized clinical trial to evaluate the clinical performance and wear of a nanocomposite versus a hybrid composite.
    Palaniappan S; Bharadwaj D; Mattar DL; Peumans M; Van Meerbeek B; Lambrechts P
    Dent Mater; 2009 Nov; 25(11):1302-14. PubMed ID: 19577288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A comparison of the wear resistance and hardness of indirect composite resins.
    Mandikos MN; McGivney GP; Davis E; Bush PJ; Carter JM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Apr; 85(4):386-95. PubMed ID: 11319537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Long-term degradation of enamel and dentin bonds: 6-year results in vitro vs. in vivo.
    Garcia-Godoy F; Krämer N; Feilzer AJ; Frankenberger R
    Dent Mater; 2010 Nov; 26(11):1113-8. PubMed ID: 20800270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Marginal integrity and secondary caries of selectively excavated teeth in vitro.
    Schwendicke F; Kern M; Blunck U; Dörfer C; Drenck J; Paris S
    J Dent; 2014 Oct; 42(10):1261-8. PubMed ID: 25132367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effect of organic peroxide additives on wear resistance of composite resin.
    Suzuki S; Leinfelder KF
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 1997 Oct; 18(10):1006-8, 1009-11. PubMed ID: 9533310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Potential of restorative systems with simplified adhesives: quantitative analysis of wear and marginal adaptation in vitro.
    Göhring TN; Schönenberger KA; Lutz F
    Am J Dent; 2003 Aug; 16(4):275-82. PubMed ID: 14579884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. SEM analysis of marginal expansion and gap formation in Class II composite restorations.
    Thonemann BM; Federlin M; Schmalz G; Hiller KA
    Dent Mater; 1997 May; 13(3):192-7. PubMed ID: 9758974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Flowable materials as an intermediate layer could improve the marginal and internal adaptation of composite restorations in Class-V-cavities.
    Li Q; Jepsen S; Albers HK; Eberhard J
    Dent Mater; 2006 Mar; 22(3):250-7. PubMed ID: 16084584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The effect of hydrofluoric acid surface treatment and bond strength of a zirconia veneering ceramic.
    Chaiyabutr Y; McGowan S; Phillips KM; Kois JC; Giordano RA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Sep; 100(3):194-202. PubMed ID: 18762031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. In vitro evaluation of the marginal degradation of dental composites under simulated occlusal loading.
    Ferracane JL; Condon JR
    Dent Mater; 1999 Jul; 15(4):262-7. PubMed ID: 10551094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Marginal adaptation of heat-pressed glass-ceramic veneers to Class 3 composite restorations in vitro.
    Christgau M; Friedl KH; Schmalz G; Edelmann K
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(4):233-44. PubMed ID: 10823069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Wear of composite resin veneering materials and enamel in a chewing simulator.
    Mehl C; Scheibner S; Ludwig K; Kern M
    Dent Mater; 2007 Nov; 23(11):1382-9. PubMed ID: 17210173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Assessing the tooth-restoration interface wear resistance of two cementation techniques: effect of a surface sealant.
    Prakki A; Ribeiro IW; Cilli R; Mondelli RF
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(6):739-46. PubMed ID: 16382597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Influence of the antagonist material on the wear of different composites using two different wear simulation methods.
    Heintze SD; Zellweger G; Cavalleri A; Ferracane J
    Dent Mater; 2006 Feb; 22(2):166-75. PubMed ID: 16087228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. In vitro wear evaluation of dental materials in primary teeth.
    da Cunha MR; Puppin-Rontani RM; Ferracane JL; Correr-Sobrinho L
    Am J Dent; 2006 Dec; 19(6):364-9. PubMed ID: 17212079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. In vitro quantitative assessment of generalized wear of dental composites.
    Kawai K; Tsuchitani Y
    J Osaka Univ Dent Sch; 1994 Dec; 34():9-18. PubMed ID: 8935089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.