These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9063139)

  • 1. Biomechanics of the Brånemark system.
    Rangert B
    Aust Prosthodont J; 1995; 9 Suppl():39-48. PubMed ID: 9063139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Implants (3.3 mm diameter) for the rehabilitation of edentulous posterior regions: a retrospective clinical study with up to 11 years of follow-up.
    Maló P; de Araújo Nobre M
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2011 Jun; 13(2):95-103. PubMed ID: 19681926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of load transfer characteristics of five different implants in compact bone at different load levels by finite elements analysis.
    Bozkaya D; Muftu S; Muftu A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Dec; 92(6):523-30. PubMed ID: 15583556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Consensus statements and clinical recommendations for implant loading protocols.
    Gallucci GO; Benic GI; Eckert SE; Papaspyridakos P; Schimmel M; Schrott A; Weber HP
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29 Suppl():287-90. PubMed ID: 24660204
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Long-term evaluation of Astra Tech and Brånemark implants in patients treated with full-arch bridges. Results after 12-15 years.
    Ravald N; Dahlgren S; Teiwik A; Gröndahl K
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Oct; 24(10):1144-51. PubMed ID: 22762251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Immediate occlusal loading of implants in the partially edentate mandible: a prospective 1-year radiographic and 4-year clinical study.
    Ostman PO; Hellman M; Sennerby L
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(2):315-22. PubMed ID: 18548929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Short dental implants in posterior partial edentulism: a multicenter retrospective 6-year case series study.
    Misch CE; Steignga J; Barboza E; Misch-Dietsh F; Cianciola LJ; Kazor C
    J Periodontol; 2006 Aug; 77(8):1340-7. PubMed ID: 16937587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Outcome of oral implant treatment in partially edentulous jaws followed 20 years in clinical function.
    Lekholm U; Gröndahl K; Jemt T
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2006; 8(4):178-86. PubMed ID: 17100743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Implant-bone load transfer mechanisms in complete-arch prostheses supported by four implants: a three-dimensional finite element approach.
    Baggi L; Pastore S; Di Girolamo M; Vairo G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Jan; 109(1):9-21. PubMed ID: 23328192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Finite element stress analysis of the influence of staggered versus straight placement of dental implants.
    Akça K; Iplikçioğlu H
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(5):722-30. PubMed ID: 11669255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Occlusal considerations for implant restorations in the partially edentulous patient.
    Curtis DA; Sharma A; Finzen FC; Kao RT
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 2000 Oct; 28(10):771-9. PubMed ID: 11326520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Using implant positions: treatment planning canine and first molar rules.
    Misch CE; Silc JT
    Dent Today; 2009 Aug; 28(8):66, 68, 70-1. PubMed ID: 19715069
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biomechanical comparison of straight and staggered implant placement configurations.
    Itoh H; Caputo AA; Kuroe T; Nakahara H
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2004 Feb; 24(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 14984145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The influence of functional forces on the biomechanics of implant-supported prostheses--a review.
    Sahin S; Cehreli MC; Yalçin E
    J Dent; 2002; 30(7-8):271-82. PubMed ID: 12554107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Implant screw mechanics.
    McGlumphy EA; Mendel DA; Holloway JA
    Dent Clin North Am; 1998 Jan; 42(1):71-89. PubMed ID: 9421671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Rehabilitation of edentulous mandibles by means of five TiUnite implants after one-stage surgery: a 1-year retrospective study of 90 patients.
    Friberg B; Jemt T
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2008 Mar; 10(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 18254740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Finite element analysis of effect of prosthesis height, angle of force application, and implant offset on supporting bone.
    Sütpideler M; Eckert SE; Zobitz M; An KN
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(6):819-25. PubMed ID: 15623056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Flapless surgery and immediately loaded implants: a retrospective comparison between implantation with and without computer-assisted planned surgical stent.
    Danza M; Carinci F
    Stomatologija; 2010; 12(2):35-41. PubMed ID: 20679754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cemented CeraOne and porcelain fused to TiAdapt abutment single-implant crown restorations: a 10-year comparative follow-up study.
    Jemt T
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Dec; 11(4):303-10. PubMed ID: 18783414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Factors influencing marginal tissue remodeling around implants.
    Rompen E; Touati B; Van Dooren E
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2003; 15(10):754-7, 759, 761. PubMed ID: 14969212
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.