These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

285 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9063224)

  • 1. Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of resin-dentin and calcium hydroxide-dentin interface with resin composite restorations.
    Goracci G; Mori G
    Quintessence Int; 1996 Feb; 27(2):129-35. PubMed ID: 9063224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of etching agent on dentinal adhesive interface in primary teeth.
    Rontani RM; Ducatti CH; Garcia-Godoy F; De Goes MF
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2000; 24(3):205-9. PubMed ID: 11314144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of interfacial bond quality on the direction of polymerization shrinkage flow in resin composite restorations.
    Cho BH; Dickens SH; Bae JH; Chang CG; Son HH; Um CM
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(3):297-304. PubMed ID: 12022463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Marginal adaptation of composite restorations versus hybrid ionomer/composite sandwich restorations.
    Friedl KH; Schmalz G; Hiller KA; Mortazavi F
    Oper Dent; 1997; 22(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 9227124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of the restorative technique and new adhesives on the dentin marginal seal and adaptation of resin composite Class II restorations: an in vitro evaluation.
    Dietschi D; De Siebenthal G; Neveu-Rosenstand L; Holz J
    Quintessence Int; 1995 Oct; 26(10):717-27. PubMed ID: 8935115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dentin bond strength and marginal adaptation: direct composite resins vs ceramic inlays.
    Frankenberger R; Sindel J; Krämer N; Petschelt A
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(3):147-55. PubMed ID: 10530276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative in vivo and in vitro investigation of interfacial bond variability.
    Hannig M; Friedrichs C
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 11203774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Marginal adaptation and microtensile bond strength of composite indirect restorations bonded to dentin treated with adhesive and low-viscosity composite.
    de Andrade OS; de Goes MF; Montes MA
    Dent Mater; 2007 Mar; 23(3):279-87. PubMed ID: 16546249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of additional enamel etching and a flowable composite to the interfacial integrity of Class II adhesive composite restorations.
    Belli S; Inokoshi S; Ozer F; Pereira PN; Ogata M; Tagami J
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(1):70-5. PubMed ID: 11203780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Directed polymerization shrinkage versus a horizontal incremental filling technique: interfacial adaptation in vivo in Class II cavities.
    van Dijken JW; Hörstedt P; Waern R
    Am J Dent; 1998 Aug; 11(4):165-72. PubMed ID: 10388370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. SEM study of a self-etching primer adhesive system used for dentin bonding in primary and permanent teeth.
    da Silva Telles PD; Aparecida M; Machado M; Nör JE
    Pediatr Dent; 2001; 23(4):315-20. PubMed ID: 11572489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Indirect pulp treatment: in vivo outcomes of an adhesive resin system vs calcium hydroxide for protection of the dentin-pulp complex.
    Falster CA; Araujo FB; Straffon LH; Nör JE
    Pediatr Dent; 2002; 24(3):241-8. PubMed ID: 12064499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Microleakage of etched-dentin composite resin restorations.
    Swift EJ; LeValley BD
    Quintessence Int; 1992 Jul; 23(7):505-8. PubMed ID: 1410253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical performance and SEM evaluation of direct composite restorations in primary molars.
    Puppin-Rontani RM; de Góes MF; Voelske CE; García-Godoy F
    Am J Dent; 2006 Oct; 19(5):255-61. PubMed ID: 17073199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fluoride penetration into the hybrid layer from a dentin adhesive.
    Ferracane JL; Mitchem JC; Adey JD
    Am J Dent; 1998 Feb; 11(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 9823082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Micromorphologic relationship between resin and dentin in Class II restorations: an in vivo and in vitro investigation by scanning electron microscopy.
    Ferrari M; Cagidiaco MC; Mason PN
    Quintessence Int; 1994 Dec; 25(12):861-6. PubMed ID: 7568696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Laboratory evaluation of compomers in Class V restorations.
    Chersoni S; Lorenzi R; Ferrieri P; Prati C
    Am J Dent; 1997 Jun; 10(3):147-51. PubMed ID: 9545890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Direct dentin bonding technique sensitivity when using air/suction drying steps.
    Magne P; Mahallati R; Bazos P; So WS
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2008; 20(2):130-8; discussion 139-40. PubMed ID: 18380845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The micromorphologic relationship between resin and dentin in Class V restorations: an in vivo and in vitro investigation.
    Ferrari M
    Quintessence Int; 1994 Sep; 25(9):621-5. PubMed ID: 7568715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Resistance of cementum in Class II and V cavities to penetration by an adhesive system.
    Ferrari M; Cagidiaco MC; Davidson CL
    Dent Mater; 1997 May; 13(3):157-62. PubMed ID: 9758968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.