98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9063622)
1. Update in digital mammography.
Hogge JP; Artz DS; Freedman MT
Crit Rev Diagn Imaging; 1997; 38(1):89-113. PubMed ID: 9063622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Digital mammography, computer-aided diagnosis, and telemammography.
Feig SA; Yaffe MJ
Radiol Clin North Am; 1995 Nov; 33(6):1205-30. PubMed ID: 7480666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Digital mammography.
Lewin JM; D'Orsi CJ; Hendrick RE
Radiol Clin North Am; 2004 Sep; 42(5):871-84, vi. PubMed ID: 15337422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Experiences with phantom measurements in different mammographic systems].
Schulz-Wendtland R; Aichinger U; Lell M; Kuchar I; Bautz W
Rofo; 2002 Oct; 174(10):1243-6. PubMed ID: 12375196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Advantages of magnification in digital phase-contrast mammography using a practical X-ray tube.
Honda C; Ohara H
Eur J Radiol; 2008 Dec; 68(3 Suppl):S69-72. PubMed ID: 18584984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Image quality in digital mammography: image acquisition.
Williams MB; Yaffe MJ; Maidment AD; Martin MC; Seibert JA; Pisano ED
J Am Coll Radiol; 2006 Aug; 3(8):589-608. PubMed ID: 17412134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. FDA & digital mammography: why has FDA required full field digital mammography systems to be regulated as potentially dangerous devices for more than 10 years?
Nields MW
Acad Radiol; 2010 May; 17(5):652-7. PubMed ID: 20380981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Computer vision and artificial intelligence in mammography.
Vyborny CJ; Giger ML
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Mar; 162(3):699-708. PubMed ID: 8109525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Soft-copy reading in digital mammography of mass: diagnostic performance of a 5-megapixel cathode ray tube monitor versus a 3-megapixel liquid crystal display monitor in a diagnostic setting.
Uematsu T; Kasami M
Acta Radiol; 2008 Jul; 49(6):623-9. PubMed ID: 18568553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of missing data in evaluating artificial neural networks trained on complete data.
Markey MK; Tourassi GD; Margolis M; DeLong DM
Comput Biol Med; 2006 May; 36(5):516-25. PubMed ID: 15893745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Digital mammography and related technologies: a perspective from the National Cancer Institute.
Shtern F
Radiology; 1992 Jun; 183(3):629-30. PubMed ID: 1584908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The current status of digital mammography.
James JJ
Clin Radiol; 2004 Jan; 59(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 14697370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Application of expert systems to mammographic image analysis.
Cook HM; Fox MD
Am J Physiol Imaging; 1989; 4(1):16-22. PubMed ID: 2923720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Technology transfer in digital mammography. Report of the Joint National Cancer Institute-National Aeronautics and Space Administration workshop of May 19-20, 1993.
Winfield D; Silbiger M; Brown GS; Clarke L; Dwyer S; Yaffe M; Shtern F
Invest Radiol; 1994 Apr; 29(4):507-15. PubMed ID: 7913457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Digital mammography: current capabilities and obstacles.
Parikh J
J Am Coll Radiol; 2005 Sep; 2(9):759-67. PubMed ID: 17411924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Current state of digital mammography.
Shiraishi A
Breast Cancer; 2008; 15(3):194-9. PubMed ID: 18365303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Digital mammography: state of the art.
Gater L
Radiol Technol; 2002; 73(5):445-57; quiz 458-60. PubMed ID: 12048983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Significance analysis of qualitative mammographic features, using linear classifiers, neural networks and support vector machines.
Mavroforakis M; Georgiou H; Dimitropoulos N; Cavouras D; Theodoridis S
Eur J Radiol; 2005 Apr; 54(1):80-9. PubMed ID: 15797296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. New methods for imaging the breast: techniques, findings, and potential.
Adler DD; Wahl RL
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Jan; 164(1):19-30. PubMed ID: 7998538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Update on digital radiography.
Schaefer-Prokop C; Uffmann M
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Nov; 72(2):193. PubMed ID: 19766420
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
