These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. The automated assessment of ultrasound scanner lateral and slice thickness resolution: use of the step response. Rowland DE; Newey VR; Turner DP; Nassiri DK Ultrasound Med Biol; 2009 Sep; 35(9):1525-34. PubMed ID: 19560252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Quality assurance in heart surgery: 8 years experience with a "feedback-control" system in Heidelberg]. Vahl CF; Meinzer P; Thomas G; Osswald BR; Hagl S Herz; 1996 Dec; 21(6):371-82. PubMed ID: 9081906 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Quality assurance in ultrasound diagnostic equipment in West Germany. Experiences with current regulations]. Trier HG Ultraschall Med; 1985 Oct; 6(5):255-64. PubMed ID: 3909397 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quality management of ultrasound diagnosis. Insana MF; Hall TJ Clin Diagn Ultrasound; 1993; 28():161-81. PubMed ID: 8476643 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Adaptive field-of-view imaging for efficient receive beamforming in medical ultrasound imaging systems. Agarwal A; Yoo YM; Schneider FK; Kim Y Ultrasonics; 2008 Sep; 48(5):384-93. PubMed ID: 18372001 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reproducibility of phantom-based quality assurance parameters in real-time ultrasound imaging. Sipilä O; Blomqvist P; Jauhiainen M; Kilpeläinen T; Malaska P; Mannila V; Vinnurva-Jussila T; Virsula S Acta Radiol; 2011 Jul; 52(6):665-9. PubMed ID: 21508202 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Training and quality assurance in ultrasound diagnosis]. Zweifel HJ; Schöb W Ultraschall Med; 1982 Jun; 3(2):38-46. PubMed ID: 9417600 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Results of measurement of resolution capability of ultrasonographic equipment using our new method]. Dolezal L; Hálek J; Smolan S Sb Lek; 1998; 99(4):447-53. PubMed ID: 10803287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Computerization and the importance of information in health system, as in health care resources registry]. Troselj M; Fanton D Acta Med Croatica; 2005; 59(3):251-7. PubMed ID: 16095200 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [PC-assisted network for quality control in film development]. Buchberger W; Giacomuzzi SM; Springer P Aktuelle Radiol; 1996 Nov; 6(6):341-3. PubMed ID: 9081409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Functional properties of diagnostic ultrasound instruments. A concept of trial building blocks for implementing quality assurance]. Trier HG Ultraschall Med; 1994 Oct; 15(5):223-32. PubMed ID: 7801092 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Investigation of the suitability of tissue phantoms for testing the constancy of ultrasonic transducer arrays in quality assurance. Rosenfeld E; Wolter S; Kopp A; Liebscher E Ultraschall Med; 2012 Jun; 33(3):289-94. PubMed ID: 22576698 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [The dilemma of data flood - reducing costs and increasing quality control]. Gassmann B Praxis (Bern 1994); 2012 Sep; 101(18):1197-202. PubMed ID: 22945822 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Current malaria situation in the Republic of Kazakhstan]. Bismil'din FB; Shapieva ZhZh; Anpilova EN Med Parazitol (Mosk); 2001; (1):24-33. PubMed ID: 11548308 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Six Sigma: not for the faint of heart. Benedetto AR Radiol Manage; 2003; 25(2):40-53. PubMed ID: 12800564 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]