219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9066928)
1. Optimal weighting scheme for affected sib-pair analysis of sibship data.
Sham PC; Zhao JH; Curtis D
Ann Hum Genet; 1997 Jan; 61(Pt 1):61-9. PubMed ID: 9066928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of sib-pair linkage tests for disease susceptibility loci.
Blackwelder WC; Elston RC
Genet Epidemiol; 1985; 2(1):85-97. PubMed ID: 3863778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Correcting for ascertainment bias of relative-risk estimates obtained using affected-sib-pair linkage data.
Cordell HJ; Olson JM
Genet Epidemiol; 2000 Apr; 18(4):307-21. PubMed ID: 10797591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of four sib-pair linkage methods for analyzing sibships with more than two affecteds: interest of the binomial maximum likelihood approach.
Abel L; Alcais A; Mallet A
Genet Epidemiol; 1998; 15(4):371-90. PubMed ID: 9671987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Likelihood-based inference for the genetic relative risk based on affected-sibling-pair marker data.
McKnight B; Tierney C; McGorray SP; Day NE
Biometrics; 1998 Jun; 54(2):426-43. PubMed ID: 9629637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [The affected sib-set method: revision based on the mixed model using a conditional probability approach].
Sergeev AS
Genetika; 1991 Nov; 27(11):2020-33. PubMed ID: 1802788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Affected sib-pair tests for linkage: type I errors with dependent sib-pairs.
Meunier F; Philippi A; Martinez M; Demenais F
Genet Epidemiol; 1997; 14(6):1107-11. PubMed ID: 9433632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Haseman and Elston revisited.
Elston RC; Buxbaum S; Jacobs KB; Olson JM
Genet Epidemiol; 2000 Jul; 19(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 10861893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The impact of varying diagnostic thresholds on affected sib pair linkage analysis.
Kendler KS
Genet Epidemiol; 1988; 5(6):407-19. PubMed ID: 3209053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Two-stage global search designs for linkage analysis I: use of the mean statistic for affected sib pairs.
Guo X; Elston RC
Genet Epidemiol; 2000 Feb; 18(2):97-110. PubMed ID: 10642424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Testing linkage and gene x environment interaction: comparison of different affected sib-pair methods.
Dizier MH; Selinger-Leneman H; Genin E
Genet Epidemiol; 2003 Jul; 25(1):73-9. PubMed ID: 12813728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Model-free sib-pair linkage analysis: combining full-sib and half-sib pairs.
Schaid DJ; Elston RC; Tran L; Wilson AF
Genet Epidemiol; 2000 Jul; 19(1):30-51. PubMed ID: 10861895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Maximum-Likelihood-Binomial method for genetic model-free linkage analysis of quantitative traits in sibships.
Alcaïs A; Abel L
Genet Epidemiol; 1999; 17(2):102-17. PubMed ID: 10414555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Relationship estimation in affected sib pair analysis of late-onset diseases.
Göring HH; Ott J
Eur J Hum Genet; 1997; 5(2):69-77. PubMed ID: 9195155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Detection of major genes underlying several quantitative traits associated with a common disease using different ascertainment schemes.
Iyengar S; Calafell F; Kidd KK
Genet Epidemiol; 1997; 14(6):809-14. PubMed ID: 9433582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Affected-sib-pair test for linkage based on constraints for identical-by-descent distributions corresponding to disease models with imprinting.
Knapp M; Strauch K
Genet Epidemiol; 2004 May; 26(4):273-85. PubMed ID: 15095387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Affected sib pair identity by state analyses.
Thomson G; Motro U
Genet Epidemiol; 1994; 11(4):353-64. PubMed ID: 7813897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Hidden linkage: a comparison of the affected sib pair (ASP) test and transmission/disequilibrium test (TDT).
McGinnis RE
Ann Hum Genet; 1998 Mar; 62(Pt 2):159-79. PubMed ID: 9759477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The power of two-locus affected sib-pair linkage analysis to detect interacting disease loci.
Hallgrímsdóttir IB; Speed TP
Genet Epidemiol; 2008 Jan; 32(1):84-8. PubMed ID: 17654608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Incorporation of covariates in multipoint model-free linkage analysis of binary traits: how important are unaffecteds?
Alcaïs A; Abel L
Eur J Hum Genet; 2001 Aug; 9(8):613-20. PubMed ID: 11528507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
