These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9068821)

  • 1. Changes in perceived speed following adaptation to first-order and second-order motion.
    Ledgeway T; Smith AT
    Vision Res; 1997 Jan; 37(2):215-24. PubMed ID: 9068821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Adaptation to second-order motion results in a motion aftereffect for directionally-ambiguous test stimuli.
    Ledgeway T
    Vision Res; 1994 Nov; 34(21):2879-89. PubMed ID: 7975322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The perceived speed of second-order motion and its dependence on stimulus contrast.
    Ledgeway T; Smith AT
    Vision Res; 1995 May; 35(10):1421-34. PubMed ID: 7645271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The duration of the motion aftereffect following adaptation to first-order and second-order motion.
    Ledgeway T; Smith AT
    Perception; 1994; 23(10):1211-9. PubMed ID: 7899037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dual multiple-scale processing for motion in the human visual system.
    Nishida S; Ledgeway T; Edwards M
    Vision Res; 1997 Oct; 37(19):2685-98. PubMed ID: 9373668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The relative contributions of global and local acceleration components on speed perception and discriminability following adaptation.
    Hietanen MA
    Vision Res; 2015 Oct; 115(Pt A):135-41. PubMed ID: 26278165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Adaptation to temporal modulation can enhance differential speed sensitivity.
    Clifford CW; Wenderoth P
    Vision Res; 1999 Oct; 39(26):4324-32. PubMed ID: 10789426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Test stimulus characteristics determine the perceived speed of the dynamic motion aftereffect.
    Curran W; Benton CP
    Vision Res; 2006 Oct; 46(19):3284-90. PubMed ID: 16684553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reduction in the motion coherence threshold for the same direction as that perceived during adaptation.
    Hirahara M
    Vision Res; 2006 Dec; 46(28):4623-33. PubMed ID: 17092532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Failure of direction identification for briefly presented second-order motion stimuli: evidence for weak direction selectivity of the mechanisms encoding motion.
    Ledgeway T; Hess RF
    Vision Res; 2002 Jun; 42(14):1739-58. PubMed ID: 12127107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Direction identification thresholds for second-order motion in central and peripheral vision.
    Smith AT; Hess RF; Baker CL
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 1994 Feb; 11(2):506-14. PubMed ID: 8120698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Separate motion-detecting mechanisms for first- and second-order patterns revealed by rapid forms of visual motion priming and motion aftereffect.
    Pavan A; Campana G; Guerreschi M; Manassi M; Casco C
    J Vis; 2009 Oct; 9(11):27.1-16. PubMed ID: 20053090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of contrast and adaptation on the perception of the direction and speed of drifting gratings.
    Müller R; Greenlee MW
    Vision Res; 1994 Aug; 34(16):2071-92. PubMed ID: 7941406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Discrimination of the speed and direction of global second-order motion in stochastic displays.
    Ledgeway T
    Vision Res; 1999 Nov; 39(22):3710-20. PubMed ID: 10746141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Velocity dependence of the interocular transfer of dynamic motion aftereffects.
    Tao R; Lankheet MJ; van de Grind WA; van Wezel RJ
    Perception; 2003; 32(7):855-66. PubMed ID: 12974570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Motion aftereffect of combined first-order and second-order motion.
    van der Smagt MJ; Verstraten FA; Vaessen EB; van Londen T; van de Grind WA
    Perception; 1999; 28(11):1397-411. PubMed ID: 10755148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Distinct position assignment mechanisms revealed by cross-order motion.
    Pavan A; Mather G
    Vision Res; 2008 Sep; 48(21):2260-8. PubMed ID: 18675290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Differential changes in human perception of speed due to motion adaptation.
    Hietanen MA; Crowder NA; Ibbotson MR
    J Vis; 2008 Aug; 8(11):6.1-10. PubMed ID: 18831600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sensitivity to second-order motion as a function of temporal frequency and eccentricity.
    Smith AT; Ledgeway T
    Vision Res; 1998 Feb; 38(3):403-10. PubMed ID: 9536363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Choice reaction times for identifying the direction of first-order motion and different varieties of second-order motion.
    Ledgeway T; Hutchinson CV
    Vision Res; 2008 Jan; 48(2):208-22. PubMed ID: 18096198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.