These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9068833)
1. Pitfalls in estimating motion detector receptive field geometry. Fredericksen RE; Verstraten FA; van de Grind WA Vision Res; 1997 Jan; 37(1):99-119. PubMed ID: 9068833 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Spatial summation and its interaction with the temporal integration mechanism in human motion perception. Fredericksen RE; Verstraten FA; van de Grind WA Vision Res; 1994 Dec; 34(23):3171-88. PubMed ID: 7975349 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Spatial summation properties of directionally selective mechanisms in human vision. Anderson SJ; Burr DC J Opt Soc Am A; 1991 Aug; 8(8):1330-9. PubMed ID: 1919836 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Two-dimensional spatial and spatial-frequency selectivity of motion-sensitive mechanisms in human vision. Anderson SJ; Burr DC; Morrone MC J Opt Soc Am A; 1991 Aug; 8(8):1340-51. PubMed ID: 1919837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Center-surround inhibition and facilitation as a function of size and contrast at multiple levels of visual motion processing. Paffen CL; van der Smagt MJ; te Pas SF; Verstraten FA J Vis; 2005 Jul; 5(6):571-8. PubMed ID: 16097869 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Temporal integration of random dot apparent motion information in human central vision. Fredericksen RE; Verstraten FA; Van de Grind WA Vision Res; 1994 Feb; 34(4):461-76. PubMed ID: 8303830 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Receptive field size of human motion detection units. Anderson SJ; Burr DC Vision Res; 1987; 27(4):621-35. PubMed ID: 3660623 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An analysis of the temporal integration mechanism in human motion perception. Fredericksen RE; Verstraten FA; van de Grind WA Vision Res; 1994 Dec; 34(23):3153-70. PubMed ID: 7975348 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Perceptual consequences of centre-surround antagonism in visual motion processing. Tadin D; Lappin JS; Gilroy LA; Blake R Nature; 2003 Jul; 424(6946):312-5. PubMed ID: 12867982 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impaired spatial and binocular summation for motion direction discrimination in strabismic amblyopia. Thompson B; Richard A; Churan J; Hess RF; Aaen-Stockdale C; Pack CC Vision Res; 2011 Mar; 51(6):577-84. PubMed ID: 21300079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Interaction of spatial and temporal factors in psychophysical estimates of surround suppression. Churan J; Richard AG; Pack CC J Vis; 2009 Apr; 9(4):15.1-15. PubMed ID: 19757924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Spatial resolution and receptive field height of motion sensors in human vision. Georgeson MA; Scott-Samuel NE Vision Res; 2000; 40(7):745-58. PubMed ID: 10683453 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Spatial characteristics of motion-sensitive mechanisms change with age and stimulus spatial frequency. Betts LR; Sekuler AB; Bennett PJ Vision Res; 2012 Jan; 53(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 22100817 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mismatched summation mechanisms in older adults for the perception of small moving stimuli. McDougall TJ; Nguyen BN; McKendrick AM; Badcock DR Vision Res; 2018 Jan; 142():52-57. PubMed ID: 29097237 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Areal influences on complex cells in cat striate cortex: stimulus-specificity of width and length summation. Hammond P; Munden IM Exp Brain Res; 1990; 80(1):135-47. PubMed ID: 2358024 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]