These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
24. Larger receptive fields revealed using Battenberg stimuli to assess contrast summation with moving patterns. McDougall TJ; Dickinson JE; Badcock DR J Vis; 2016 Sep; 16(11):6. PubMed ID: 27604069 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Antagonism between fine and coarse motion sensors depends on stimulus size and contrast. Serrano-Pedraza I; Derrington AM J Vis; 2010 Jul; 10(8):18. PubMed ID: 20884593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Spatial integration characteristics in motion detection and direction identification. Gorea A Spat Vis; 1985; 1(2):85-102. PubMed ID: 3940060 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Spatial summation processes in the receptive fields of visually driven neurons of the cat's cortical area 21a. Harutiunian-Kozak BA; Sharanbekian AB; Kazarian AL; Grigorian GG; Kozak JA; Sarkisyan GS; Khachvankian DK Arch Ital Biol; 2006 Aug; 144(3-4):127-44. PubMed ID: 16977829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Seeing objects in motion. Burr DC; Ross J; Morrone MC Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 1986 Mar; 227(1247):249-65. PubMed ID: 2871557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Motion integration over space: interaction of the center and surround motion. Kim J; Wilson HR Vision Res; 1997 Apr; 37(8):991-1005. PubMed ID: 9196718 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Motion mechanisms with different spatiotemporal characteristics identified by an MAE technique with superimposed gratings. Shioiri S; Matsumiya K J Vis; 2009 May; 9(5):30.1-15. PubMed ID: 19757908 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Spatial summation across the central visual field: implications for visual field testing. Khuu SK; Kalloniatis M J Vis; 2015 Jan; 15(1):15.1.6. PubMed ID: 25583876 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Receptive field properties of human motion detector units inferred from spatial frequency masking. Anderson SJ; Burr DC Vision Res; 1989; 29(10):1343-58. PubMed ID: 2635464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A theory of phenomenal geometry and its applications. Gogel WC Percept Psychophys; 1990 Aug; 48(2):105-23. PubMed ID: 2385484 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Spatiotemporal organization of simple-cell receptive fields in the cat's striate cortex. II. Linearity of temporal and spatial summation. DeAngelis GC; Ohzawa I; Freeman RD J Neurophysiol; 1993 Apr; 69(4):1118-35. PubMed ID: 8492152 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Contrast and stimulus complexity moderate the relationship between spatial frequency and perceived speed: implications for MT models of speed perception. Brooks KR; Morris T; Thompson P J Vis; 2011 Dec; 11(14):19. PubMed ID: 22194317 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Low- and high-level first-order random-dot kinematograms: evidence from fMRI. Ho CS; Giaschi DE Vision Res; 2009 Jul; 49(14):1814-24. PubMed ID: 19393261 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Effects of adapting luminance and stimulus contrast on the temporal and spatial limits of short-range motion. Dawson M; Di Lollo V Vision Res; 1990; 30(3):415-29. PubMed ID: 2336800 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. How big is a Gabor patch, and why should we care? Fredericksen RE; Bex PJ; Verstraten FA J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 1997 Jan; 14(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 8988615 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]